Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For certain educators, the prospectus of universities seems to be incomplete. They have put a proposal forward, in which the population of male students should be as the same quantities as these of female students who get admission in every subject that was launched in universities.
However, I would like to take the opposite views on this considerably divergent issue. In the first place, the proportion of male college students as well as these of female ones may be impacted by men and women birth ratio in contemporary era to a large extent, in another word, mostly by the percentage of each gender in college-age students of the year rather than by rigid admission rules. By that I mean, that entrance requirements do play crucial role in selecting students and educators and educators can compel the proportion of men and women entering subject to be equal precisely, albeit meaningless. But isn’t it a bit of ridiculous that the administration section of universities accept a simpleton of one gender in order to match a genius of another gender?
Further more, even though the ratio is exactly right as these educators expect, we can not guarantee a satisfactory result. As a proverb says, interest is the best teacher. It is quite a minor chance event that all the students regard the subject which they are accepted to learn with interests for the sake of meeting the requirement of ‘equal ratio’. Since no interests, no gains, hardly can we enjoy the pervasive technology and prosperity without a vast number of elites who always hold enthusiasm for their own vocation.
Based on the above discussion, I am strongly convinced that ruling the admission stiffly should be condemned rather than admitted because of the foreseeable development which the college students would bring to regardless of gender.