[i习作temp] Issue153 有拍必回！ [复制链接]

LaoZZZZZ
UID：2747300

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 10
寄托币: 189
注册时间: 2010-1-9
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2010-2-25 10:45:28 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

本帖最后由 LaoZZZZZ 于 2010-2-26 14:21 编辑

"Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught
instead of accepting it passively."
观点：没有对权威的质疑，就没有进步，但是过度的，毫无根据的质疑，只能造成混乱。因此我们应该培养学生质疑的能力。
提纲：
1.无论是在科学，社会，还是艺术领域，对权威的质疑一直是各个领域发展的重要动力，随着人类掌握的客观事实的不断增加，许多
权威的论断或者理论的局限性逐渐暴露了出来，因此质疑权威并修正不全面的理论促进了各个领域的发展。
比如日心说，heliocentric theory,geocentric theory.
比如公民对政府的法律，政策的一些质疑，可以提高政府的效率，和法律的健全
2.但是过度的质疑也会阻碍社会的进步，可以想象，如果我们对所学的知识都一一进行怀疑，那我们将陷入怀疑的漩涡，无法前进。
还有，就是那些以个人私利为目的的质疑。比如，那些唯恐天下不乱的乱臣贼子，他们会无端的嫌弃质疑政府正确的政策的浪潮。
3。在教育方面，我们也要培养学生的质疑精神，作为社会未来，他们应该学会如何根据有效的事实，对有争议的问题或者理论，提
出自己不同的看法或者质疑权威，并在这个过程中逐渐完善总的科学体系和改善社会的一些不公正现象。

Should student blindly accept whatever they are taught or skepticize whatever they learn,as the speaker contends?I share the idea with speaker that skepticism is an indispensable part of students' study even our daily life.However,excessive inquiries will hinde the process of study and ultimately the development of society as a whole.
Skepticizing authorative perhaps is the crucial impetus to the advance of each area,regardless of science,sociology as well as art.In the contrast,Passive acceptance to achievements of each fields will cover flaws of the established theories,institutions or vogue forms of art and impede untold innovations.And history is fraught with paradigmatic examples of challenging authorative and ultimatle impelled the progress of society.An remarkable example is copernicus who advanced the heliocentric theory,refuting geocentric theory supported by Roman Church in the contemporary society,beat a correct way for the following significant discoveries and theories including the observations of galelio and the Newton's laws of gravity.So,as the empirical evidences illustate,skepticism is indispensable for our study and our society.
Notwithstanding,As an old saying goes:"Going too far is as bad as not going far enough".Excessive inquiries will undoubtly do harm to our society.Consider,if students skepticize whatever they study,regradless of right or false,they need not to go very far to percieve that they have been bogged down by the endless and meanless of inquiries and ultimately stay stagnant even distraught.When it comes to the socioogy,It works in the same way.Admittedly,moderate skepticism to extant laws and the policies promulgated by govenment will improve the efficence and fairness of govenment as well as the harmony of society.However,undue challenges to govenment and extant laws ,especially from those ill-aimed people,will unevitablly harm the benefits of pulic even the stability of society.
Regarding education,we should not discourage student to ask "why" and "why not".As the core power of future,what they should learn is not only the knowledge ,but also the ability of putting forth their own ideas or skepticism on some controversial issues or theories based on some grounded facts and valid materials.And it just is the way how to perfect the system of science and art as well as the flawed society gradually.
To sum, according to foregoing discussions,skepticism is not only necessary and beneficial for students' study and the development of civilization, but also the well-being of society as a whole.However,too much inquiries to established achievements,in term of science,sociology as well as art,will be harmful either.

回应
0

使用道具举报

gorby
UID：2730851

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 9
寄托币: 169
注册时间: 2009-11-25
精华: 0
帖子: 0

沙发

发表于 2010-2-25 20:34:25 |只看该作者

1# LaoZZZZZ
"Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught
instead of accepting it passively."
观点：没有对权威的质疑，就没有进步，但是过度的，毫无根据的质疑，只能造成混乱。因此我们应该培养学生质疑的能力。
提纲：
1.无论是在科学，社会，还是艺术领域，对权威的质疑一直是各个领域发展的重要动力，随着人类掌握的客观事实的不断增加，许多
权威的论断或者理论的局限性逐渐暴露了出来，因此质疑权威并修正不全面的理论促进了各个领域的发展。
比如日心说，heliocentric theory,geocentric theory.
比如公民对政府的法律，政策的一些质疑，可以提高政府的效率，和法律的健全
2.但是过度的质疑也会阻碍社会的进步，可以想象，如果我们对所学的知识都一一进行怀疑，那我们将陷入怀疑的漩涡，无法前进。
还有，就是那些以个人私利为目的的质疑(这个与题目中给出的学生质疑相比是否有一些偏了？)。比如，那些唯恐天下不乱的乱臣贼子，他们会无端的嫌弃质疑政府正确的政策的浪潮。
3。在教育方面，我们也要培养学生的质疑精神，作为社会未来，他们应该学会如何根据有效的事实，对有争议的问题或者理论，提
出自己不同的看法或者质疑权威，并在这个过程中逐渐完善总的科学体系和改善社会的一些不公正现象。

Should student blindly accept whatever they are taught or skepticize whatever they learn,as the speaker contends?I share the idea with speaker that skepticism is an indispensable part of students' study even in
our daily life.However,excessive inquiries will hinde the process of study and ultimately the development of society as a whole.

Skepticizing authorative perhaps is the crucial impetus to the advance of each area,regardless of science,sociology as well as art.In the contrast,Passive acceptance to achievements of each fields will cover flaws of the established theories,institutions or vogue forms of art and impede untold innovations.And history is fraught with paradigmatic examples of challenging authorative and ultimately impelled the progress of society.An remarkable example is Copernicus who advanced the heliocentric theory,refuting geocentric theory supported by Roman Church in the contemporary society,beat a correct way for the following significant discoveries and theories including the observations of galelio and the Newton's laws of gravity.So,as the empirical evidences illustate,skepticism is indispensable for our study and our society.
Notwithstanding,As an old saying goes:"Going too far is as bad as not going far enough（哈哈，这句很好用啊）".Excessive inquiries will undoubtly do harm to our society.Consider,if students skepticize whatever they study,regradless of right or false,they need not to go very far to percieve that they have been bogged down by the endless and meanless of inquiries and ultimately stay stagnant even distraught.When it comes to the society,It works in the same way/It works in the same way when comes to the society.Admittedly,moderate skepticism to extant laws and the policies promulgated by govenment will improve the efficience and fairness of govenment as well as the harmony of society.However,undue challenges to govenment and extant laws ,especially from those ill-aimed people,will unevitablly harm the benefits of pulic even the stability of society.
Regarding education,we should not discourage student to ask "why" and "why not".As the core power of future,what they should learn is not only the knowledge ,but also the ability of putting forth their own ideas or skepticism on some controversial issues or theories based on some grounded facts and valid materials.And it just is the way how to perfect the system of science and art as well as the flawed society gradually.
To sum, according to foregoing discussions,skepticism is not only necessary and beneficial for students' study and the development of civilization, but also the well-being of society as a whole.However,too much inquiries to established achievements,in term of science,sociology as well as art,will be harmful either.

1.在拼写上还是有写小瑕疵，在句式方面，感觉没有上一篇流畅啊，有的地方读起来有些绕口
2.思路方面的话，感觉还是要从题目出发，最好是从题目的学生出发，再推到各个领域，推到社会。而那个为个人私利的就感觉有点偏了。

个人意见，一起讨论~

使用道具举报

prettywraith
UID：197049

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 44
寄托币: 823
注册时间: 2005-2-23
精华: 0
帖子: 3

板凳

发表于 2010-2-25 20:42:40 |只看该作者

本帖最后由 prettywraith 于 2010-2-25 20:44 编辑

Should student blindly accept whatever they are taught or skepticize whatever they learn, as the speaker contends? I share the idea with speaker that skepticism is an indispensable part of students' study even our daily life. However, excessive inquiries will hinde (hinder ??) the process of study and ultimately the development of society as a whole.
Skepticizing authorative (质疑权威authority吧，拼写有误)perhaps is the crucial impetus to the advance of each area, regardless of science, sociology as well as art. In the contrast, Passive （passive）acceptance to achievements of each fields will cover flaws of the established theories, institutions or vogue forms of art and impede untold innovations. And history is fraught with paradigmatic examples of challenging authorative and ultimatle（ultimate？？？） impelled the progress of society. An remarkable example is copernicus（首字母大写） who advanced the heliocentric theory ,refuting geocentric theory supported by Roman Church in the contemporary society, beat a correct way for the following significant discoveries and theories including the observations of galelio and the Newton's laws of gravity. So, as the empirical evidences illustate, skepticism is indispensable for our study and our society.

Notwithstanding, As an old saying goes:" Going too far is as bad as not going far enough". Excessive inquiries will undoubtly do harm to our society. Consider, if students skepticize whatever they study, regradless of right or false, they need not to go very far to percieve that they have been bogged down by the endless and meanless of inquiries and ultimately stay stagnant even distraught. When it comes to the socioogy, It works in the same way. Admittedly, moderate skepticism to extant laws and the policies promulgated by govenment will improve the efficence and fairness of govenment as well as the harmony of society. However,undue challenges to govenment and extant laws, especially from those ill-aimed people, will unevitablly harm the benefits of pulic even the stability of society.（这段举个例子怎么样，我也在想这方面的例子）

Regarding education, we should not discourage student to ask "why" and "why not". As the core power of future, what they should learn is not only the knowledge ,but also the ability of putting forth their own ideas or skepticism on some controversial issues or theories based on some grounded facts and valid materials. And it just is the way how to perfect the system of science and art as well as the flawed society gradually.

To sum（up）, according to foregoing discussions, skepticism is not only necessary and beneficial for students' study and the development of civilization, but also the well-being of society as a whole. However, too much inquiries to established achievements, in term of science, sociology as well as art, will be harmful either.（either作“也”的时候常常用在否定句中，这里换为too吧）