Listen to a talk in a literature class. The professor is discussing the poetry of Ancient Greece.
we are gonnar to start discussing a West Europe poem with the Iliad and the Odyssey.
These two great poems stand out as great examples of the earliest European poems. They are believed to have been written sometime between 800 BC and 700 BC,
partly because the poems refer to the social conditions of that time,
conditions that have been validated by the findings of archeologists But just who was the poets who laid down these cornerstones of western literature? Well tradition ascribles them to a man named Homer. But we know virtually nothing about this Homer. In fact some say that such a poet never existed at all, that
neither the Iliad nor the Odyssey was written by a single poet but rather each poem is composed of the writings of several people. This anyway is the view of school of literacy critics in the 18th century known as the Analysts. The Analysts pointed to internal evidence such as variations in the literacy devices used in the poem to argue that each work was as in fact a collection of several poems by several
Greek authors. Opposing the analysts were a second group of scholars called the Unitarian. They insisted that the Iliad and the Odyssey
could
have been the work of single poetic genius. To support their argument, they stress among other things the consistency
of the character protrayed in the poetry. "This wouldn’t’ve been possible", they said," if they were written by many different poets." Now how we look at the Homeric question today has been greatly influenced by someone named Milman Parry, an American scholar who first presented his ideas about Homer in the 1930s. So let's take a look at Parry's research and how effects what modern day scholars think about Homer.
部分单词没有听出来,the之类的冠词听不正确。词汇量太少,听力有待提高。 |