- 最后登录
- 2017-4-11
- 在线时间
- 596 小时
- 寄托币
- 690
- 声望
- 101
- 注册时间
- 2014-10-30
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 178
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 629
- UID
- 3573213
- 声望
- 101
- 寄托币
- 690
- 注册时间
- 2014-10-30
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 178
|
The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava.
"The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students enrolled in our public schools will soon decrease dramatically, and we can safely reduce the funds budgeted for education during the next decade. At the same time, we can reduce funding for athletic playing fields and other recreational facilities. As a result, we will have sufficient money to fund city facilities and programs used primarily by adults, since we can expect the adult population of the city to increase."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
In the recommendation, the committee proposed to curtail the budget for education and recreational facilities, to spare some money for city facilities. The proposal is mainly based on the prediction about the structural changes of population, which includes the increase of adults and decrease of schoolchildren. However, to evaluate whether the proposal is tenable, we need to collect more detailed evidence about the trend of population changes, the needs of different people, and the priority of various aspects of city funding.
Firstly, we need more data to delineate the trend of population changes in the recent years. If one of the two sample data is an outlier, the result of comparison and further prediction is not valid. Only with the data covering the last ten or twenty years, can we really tell the population changes in next ten years with more confidence. Moreover, even if the data is valid, the reason why there are much less newborns last year than five years ago should be fully investigated. We may need to collect the status of economy, since some couples may pull off the birth of their babies due to bad economy, but will eventually have babies later on. The development of medical service should also be studied, to make sure people are not deliberately giving birth in other places where the service is better and coming home with babies right after the birth. These coming babies will weaken the argument that the number of schoolchildren will decrease.
Taking a step back, even if there are less new borns in the future, to make the decision to cut the budget of education, we still need to collect educational needs from a perspective of the whole society, rather than only considering the students in schools. Education should be open to various people, including schoolchildren, professionals, housewives and even the retired people. Through education, professionals may catch up with the latest technologies to enhance their competence in the job market, while housewives can improve the cooking skills to better take care of the family. These needs are as important as the education for children, and will increase with the predicted increasing number of adults. People may complain on the lack of government funding on these area, not mentioning the proposed cut for athletic and recreational facilities, which are commonly used by adults in their leisure time.
Last but not least, with the spared money, we'd better prioritize the issues we need to solve. City facilities are definitely one of the candidates, but there can be more emergent issues on the list. For example, traffic issues which umbrage people every day, air pollution doing harm to our health at every breadth and medical services which save lives and relieve pain, are always on the list of most concerned issues. If there is any emergent issue remaining unresolved, city facilities, which is relatively a nice to have may need to give way to other issues.
In short, the committee needs to present more demographic data to justify the prediction of population changes. Besides, study of educational needs of various people and issues faced by the city should be included to make the budget proposal more convincing.
|
|