提纲求意见 ISSUE:beginners or experts contribute more?

superxingzhengUID: 3134648

In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely thanthe expert to make important contributions.

Write a response in which you discuss the extentto which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoningfor the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, youshould consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true andexplain how these considerations shape your position.

The statementasserts that in consideration of contributions to all kinds of inquiry such as scientific research and natural exploration, beginners are more likely to make contributions than experts. While I concede that beginners usually have fewlimitations of existing experiences or have bigger opportunity to find shortcutbesides the main-stream of expertise, however, on balance I disagree withstatement beginners have more chances to contribute to inquiries. There arevarious reasons supporting my opinion.

Firstly, theoverriding difference between an expert and a beginner is that experts havecompleted knowledge and ability to handle the inquiry and in contrast beginnersare faced with various obstacles to begin their work as empirical and personalexperiences.

Secondly, grantedthat a beginner has talent and perfect potential in the field of inquiry and hegot the advantage of lacking in limitations of past prejudice, can he make anycontribution without any help from experts in this field? No matter how thebeginner got knowledge of the field, as I think, most of existing achievement ofknowledge will thanks to experts work. So the beginner has hardly anyopportunity to exceed experts in respect of contribution.

On the other hand,work of beginners is essential for any field of inquiry, as a complementary part ofexperts work. Though it’s hard to say that beginners make more contribution,however, their braveries of innovation or creation play the part of key to thesuccess of the inquiry.

In sum,

panmingming2008UID: 2535351

1# superxingzheng
提纲写法：

1. 中心论点
   2. 分论点1
   3.分论点2
   （4.分论点3--optional 可选）

5.结尾段

分论点段：首句是主题句，要清楚，简洁。直截了当，不要让人看不明白。

---------------
参照上面的要求，你上面的英文提纲有些抽象，不太具体。原因可能是你没有做研究，手头没有例子，无法把论点具体化，读者不明白你想要说什么。
（从小到大的语文作文是要“漂亮”--就用词藻排比；而AW是说理，要理由要例子--且例子要结合你的论点，不是堆放了事）


也祝贺你迈出了第一步。千里之行，始于足下-- 越行越顺畅的。
你不妨看OG评分标准，认真写一遍，先不管时间，把握它的结构，例子运用。


起步慢慢行，掌握节奏力度后，你就能快快走啦。