【TRANSFORMER】_ARGUMENT97_0801

shevavaUID: 2574709

请大家以粘贴的方式上传，楼下改楼上的文章…修改完成后将word版上传； 晚上9点钟之前上传完成； FIGHTING...

bluyskyUID: 2657245

顶一个:loveliness:

shevavaUID: 2574709

In the memo from the manager of television station KICK, learning from the television station WACK, KICK want to revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage so that they can gain a larger audience share in its area, and thus increase company profits. Comparing WACK with KICK, there may be many other factors affecting the number of audiences doubled in its area, besides additional sports programs on television.

The nationwide survey expresses that a sizeable majority of men like to see additional sports programs on television. The television station WACK doubled its share of the television audience through increasing its sports broadcasts; however, as we all know that the audiences love watching sports programs who take a great percentage are men. This is a manifestation of the survey. But maybe in the area of WACK, sports is traditional events, thus the people in its area will pay more attention to the games broadcasted on the television. Maybe there are some great teams in the area of WACK, such as the city of LA, so that they will attract a great many audiences. Furthermore,

To increase company profits, more sports coverage is not the only way. Sports will attract a lot of audiences, however, some playing games or series of high quality, such as American Idols, Prison Break and so on, can also give the audiences good choices. On other hand, women who love romantic series are also a sizeable majority, so that increasing the romantic series broadcasts may gain a larger audience share as well.

Even if a larger audience share of the area is gained, more company profits cannot be promised. For the profits of the television company mainly comes from the advertisement patron from different products, if the area of the KICK has a good prospect of economic, KICK would gain greater profits, adding good economical operation managed by KICK.

The memo only considers the factor affecting the WACK area, ignoring that different areas have different appreciation of programs on television. Besides, audiences at different stage of life love different programs, such as children love cartoons, while men love sports games. Revising the broadcast schedule depending on the appreciation of its area would gain a larger audience share and may thus increase company profits.

shallwetalk1990UID: 2507431

题目：ARGUMENT97 - The following appeared in a memo from the manager of television station KICK.

"A nationwide survey reveals that a sizeable majority of men would like to see additional sports programs on television. After television station WACK increased its sports broadcasts, its share of the television audience in its viewing area almost doubled. To gain a larger audience share in our area, and thus increase company profits, KICK should also revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage."
字数：402          用时：6:34:49          日期：2009-8-1

It stands to reason that the points in this argument should be logical, cause of its well-presented statement. Grounding on a nationwide survey and the suppose that station WACK hold double audience than before cause of its increasing sports broadcasts, the manager accordingly advices that  station KICK takes measures as WACK's. However, when we have a deep thought, we will find some logical confusions.

Firstly, considering the reliablity of the survey in this argument, manager should calculate uncertain factors of it. Nationwide survey usually represents the national average but not local level, so it doesn't carry much conviction. Another questional point in this survey appears that objects of this investigation are all men, who can not take place all audience for granted. Without knowing the proportion of men audience, it also can be supposed that a considerable majority of audience are women who may be significant factor in determining the tend of program.

Secondly, in spite of the survey that can not deputize for all audience and all location, the hypothesis that WACK succeed in the quantity of audience owing to  the rising sports programs seems groundless. It looks still unknownable that what other mesures station WACK do to contribution its audience, this mesures  may be the major reasons of  its doubled audience. Are most new audience turn to WACK men? Do most new audience turn to WACK cause of sports broadcasts?  Do WACK make a good profit? All the questions can't be answered without verifying.

Finally, the suggestion that KICK should broadcast more sports programs to gain more audience and company profits seems feeble. It apeares reasonable, the manager draw an analogy between KICK and WACK incorrerctly, they may own dissimmilar audience gourps which make them different everywhere. Another neglected problem is that whether KICK demand more sports broadcast, maybe it is possess of more sports broadcasts than WACK's. Even if increasing sports programs only make WACK increasing audience,  it can't help KICK as same. The significant question that if this measure can increase company profit is in front of all, and no evidence can prove it.  

Overall, the manager did apply himself into his argument, while at the same time he was making lots of logical mistakes. His job should be accepted, however, the conclusion should not. The manager of KICK should evaluate all the possible alternatives and the cause makes WACK rising audience, also the clues of his reasoning.

yesrushUID: 2443769

TOPIC: ARGUMENT97 - The following appeared in a memo from the manager of television station KICK.
"A nationwide survey reveals that a sizeable majority of men would like to see additional sports programs on television. After television station WACK increased its sports broadcasts, its share of the television audience in its viewing area almost doubled. To gain a larger audience share in our area, and thus increase company profits, KICK should also revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage."
WORDS: 481          TIME: 0:44:34          DATE: 2009-8-1

In the argument, the author conclude that in order to gain a larger audience share and thus increase company profits, KICK should revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage. To support this conclusion, the author mentions two evidences: a nationwide survey and another television station called WACK which increase its sport broadcasts. However, the augument suffers from several fallacies.

To begin with, the author unfairly assumes that the tendency about wishing to see sports programs on televusion of men in the whole nation applies that of residents in local. It is true that a general man likes sports program on television, however, the men in this area are so busy with ordinary endless jobs that they can not spend one hour in front of television to enjoy a sport program after one day's work. Even if the men in this area luckily do not meet with this problem. it is possible that most of women and children in this area prefer to enjoying non-sports programs than sports programs and this kind of women and children is a large portion of the residents of this area. Absense the evidence about the information of this area's men and other residents, the author can not rely on into draw conclusion that most of the resident in this area are willing to spend time on sports programs on television.

Even if most of this area's residents would like to see additional sports programs, the authors unfairly assumes that audience's increasing in WACK is attributable to WACK's polocy that increase its sports broadcasts programs. The author ignore the possibility that there is an important match, such as the World Cup, which is held only once four years, and their country's team is taking part in this match, so more audience select this channal to enjoy this wonderful match. If this important match ends, WACK's share of the television audience may go down to normal as before. Without rolling out the factors about the sports programs during the time when the number of its audience is increasing, we can not accept the WACK's polocy leads to its audience's increasing.

In addition, the author commits a fallocy about "false analogy" between KICK and WACK. Although WACK can double the number of its audience by adding sports programs, KICK may not get this result through doing the same thing. The author ignores the posibility that there are suffient, even too much sports programs in KICK, therefore additional sports programs may not bring about additional audience. In face such of limited information about KICK, I can not accept the author's sweeping conclusion that KICK can increase its audence's number by add sports programs.

In sum, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept this conclusion, the author must present these factors: the detail information of this area's men, and the programs of KICK and WACK.

blade134UID: 2328542

TOPIC: ARGUMENT97 - The following appeared in a memo from the manager of television station KICK.

"A nationwide survey reveals that a sizeable majority of men would like to see additional sports programs on television. After television station WACK increased its sports broadcasts, its share of the television audience in its viewing area almost doubled. To gain a larger audience share in our area, and thus increase company profits, KICK should also revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage."
WORDS: 182 (outline)         TIME: 00:20:16 (outline)         DATE: 2009-8-1 下午 12:53:19

outline:
The destination of the TV station and the suggestion they made are not completely match, we only know men wanted to see more additional sports programs, but we cannot sure if they still like it when we change our schedule and put more sports content in main programs. Maybe most of our audience are women, and... ,or Maybe they were just concerning some nation-wide sports activities, such as Olympics or world cup.

The survey, which the KICK's suggestion based on, is not complete enough. How many people was involved in this survey? Which sports the audience like and how long they want these programs to boardcast? these questions are still remain unknown.

...(cut into paragraph)

Respondence:
It is unconvincable for the author to make suggestion based on some conditions not fully relevant. In this argument, the author suggests the KICK, a regional television station, should add more sports programs in their broadcast schedule because a national survey show that they are pupular with men. To strengthen his argument, he also lists the successful experience of WACK, another TV station in the different region. However, there are some logic flaws in his deduction.

First and most important, the destination of the TV station, to gain a larger audience share, can not completely match the suggestion of the author. As lacking of some integrate investigation, we cannot sure whether our audience would like sports content when we put them in all of our programs. If most of our audience turned out to be housewives who only interest in soup operas and music programs, the way he suggests would have an opposite effection on our broadcast. Or, if the men were just paying attention to some nationwide sports activities in that priod of time, such as Olympics or world cup, who can affirm they would still watch sports programs when the game over? Thus, the author should get more information about our audience and find the reason before making a suggestion.

Another flaw is the survey, which the suggestion based on, is not complete enough. For it does not show the particular number of the men involved, thus it can not help us to judge the treands of the whole nation precisely. as the premise of the author's suggestion, it is skeptical.

In addition, copying WACK's experience is an unreasonable activity, the argument does not mention how many people in WACK's area recieve the sports programs and which one kind of sports programs is the most popular. if the number of audience in WACK's region is much less than the one in KICK's , we can not deduce KICK's experience will be successful in KICK'S own area since the habits of a small number of people living in WACK can not represent the habits of most of men in KICK.

In sum, the author should concern more potential reasons of people's behavior to show his deduction is objective, meanwhile he should offer more details about the survey to validate its fairness. Without these supply, the suggestion of the author is not convincible.

sherry_cherishUID: 2613601

In this argument, the arguer concludes that television station KICK should revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage in order to gain a larger audience share in the area and thus raise company profits. To justify his claim, the arguer points out a nationwide survey which shows a large segment of men would like to see additional sports programs on television, and the fact that the share of the audience doubled after television station WACK increase its sports broadcasts. Reasonable as it seems at first thought, close scrutiny of the argument reveals several logical flaws, which render it unconvincing as it stands.
The threshold problem with this argument is that the arguer assumes that most men in the area are fond of sports programs on television by relaying on the national survey. Yet the arguer provides no evidence that it is necessarily the case. Perhaps the majority of men in this area prefer outdoor exercises rather than watching television at home. Or perhaps they are occupied by work that they do not even have time to take a breath, let alone the leisure to watch television. In addition, the data shows the interests of male audience, yet ignore the taste of female audience. It is entirely possible that the number of the latter overwhelm the former in quantity. Without ruling out all these possibilities, the arguer cannot reach the conclusion based on the survey that an increase in sports broadcasts in that area would be welcomed.
Secondly, the arguer commits the “after this, therefore because of this” fallacy, attributing the fact that television station WACK’s share of audience doubled to the increased sports broadcasts. The arguer fails to establish a causal relationship between these two events. No evidence is stated in the argument to support his assumption. Lacking such evidence, it is quite possible that other program is responsible for the increased share, such as a popular soap drama or a new brilliant talk show. Since the arguer does not respond to this concern, his assertion is open to doubt.
Finally, even if the doubled share is attributable to the additional sports programs in WACK, the arguer’s conclusion KICK should also increase its sports program for the sake of larger audience share and more profits remains unwarranted. The success of WACK cannot guarantee the profit of KICK. Audience in KICK’s area and audience in WACK’s area might have absolutely distinct tastes. Perhaps the major audience of KICK TV station are housewives who have no interest in sports broadcast. If this is the case, the increase of sports broadcast may probably lead to a decline in the share.
In sum, this argument rests on a series of unsubstantiated assumptions, which seriously undermine the whole analysis. The arguer should ponder all of the above-cited factors, find out the real reason of the decreased share of WACK, provide a precise local survey among both male and female audience, so as to make a compelling proposal.

yesrushUID: 2443769

改了shevava 的文章，个人一点拙见：语言方面不错，比较灵活，但是在段落安排上欠佳



In the memo from the manager of television station KICK, learning from the television station WACK, KICK want to revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage so that they can gain a larger audience share in its area, and thus increase company profits. Comparing WACK with KICK, there may be many other factors affecting the number of audiences doubled in its area, besides additional sports programs on television.

The nationwide survey expresses that a sizeable majority of men like to see additional sports programs on television. The television station WACK doubled its share of the television audience through increasing its sports broadcasts; however, as we all know that the audiences love watching sports programs who take a great percentage are men. This is a manifestation of the survey. But maybe in the area of WACK, sports is traditional events, thus the people in its area will pay more attention to the games broadcasted on the television. Maybe there are some great teams in the area of WACK, such as the city of LA, so that they will attract a great many audiences. （段1， WACK观众增加的额外原因）

Furthermore, to increase company profits, more sports coverage is not the only way. Sports will attract a lot of audiences, however, (one the one hand) some playing games or series of high quality, such as American Idols, Prison Break and so on, can also give the audiences good（better） choices. On other hand, women who love romantic series are also a sizeable majority, so that increasing the romantic series broadcasts may gain a larger audience share as well.（段2，其他增加观众的方法）

Even if a larger audience share of the area is gained, more company profits cannot be promised. For the profits of the television company mainly comes from the advertisement patron from different products, if the area of the KICK has a good prospect of economic, KICK would gain greater profits, adding good economical operation managed by KICK. (如果说KICK所在地区的经济不好，即使观众人数增加了，但广告收入也不会增加，profit自然也不会增加，会不会更好？)（段3， 观众增加不等于收益增加）

The memo only considers the factor affecting the WACK area, ignoring that different areas have different appreciation of programs on television. Besides, audiences at different stage of life love different programs, such as children love cartoons, while men love sports games. Revising the broadcast schedule depending on the appreciation of its area would gain a larger audience share and may thus increase company profits. （段4， KICK地区阻碍观众增加的原因）

段落安排建议是(从分析原因，到给出建议，逻辑上更通顺一些)：
段1， WACK观众增加的额外原因
段4， KICK地区阻碍观众增加的原因
段3， （即使 KICK观众增加了），观众增加不等于收益增加
段2， 其他增加观众的方法

还有，整篇文章没有结尾。。。受新东方老师影响的缘故，我觉得需要一个结尾的。

灵感女孩UID: 2224424

终于写完了 呵呵 请多指教！

Based on the ungrounded assumption and dubious evidence, the manager of television station KICK draws the conclusion that KICK should revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports programs in order to attract more audience in the area and thus increase profits for the company. To substantiate this conclusion, the manager cites a national survey which shows that a sizeable majority of men would prefer watching additional sports programs on TV. He also points out that WACK, another television station has doubled its audience share in its area by increasing sports broadcasts. At first glance, this argument appears to somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that it omits some substantial concerns that should be addressed in the argument.

To begin with, the manager made a fallacy of changing scope. He assumes that the nationwide statistics that men enjoy watching additional sports programs would be true in every part of the country. Maybe in the area that KICK covers, men enjoy watching more crime themed TV shows instead of sports games. There is no evidence to show that in this area men prefer additional sports games to other types of TV programs.

Next, the manager made a concurrence fallacy and assumed that the television station WACK doubled its audience share by including additional sports programs. This assumption is not necessarily true since there may be numerous other factors that enabled WACK to double its audience share. For example, WACK could have broadcasted some popular TV shows, like Sex and the City on HBO, or Desperate Housewives on ABC that attracted more audience to view its programs. Or perhaps, WACK could have hired humorous and creative talk show hosts who priside the show very well so that it attracted a number of new watchers of the program. Without ruling out such possibilities, the manager cannot aver that indeed, it is the additional sports programs that helped WACK to gain a larger audience share.

Furthermore, even assuming that there is a strong correlation between additional sports programs and increasing number of audience in the area of WACK, the manager made a false analogy between the two areas. The area where KICK covers can be inherently different from the area of WACK. Maybe, for example, it could be true that WACK covers an area that possesses some great sports teams, such as the Chicago Bulls, or Los Angeles Lakers, while KICK covers an area of Iowan small towns. It is also possible when KICK changes its broadcast shedule to include more sports programs by reducing other programs, the audience share may even decrease since a number of audience may be merely interested in the programs KICK shows currently.

Even assuming when KICK follows the same strategy as WACK, namely, to increase its sports broadcasts, it can increase its audience share in the area, the company may not necessarily make more profit. Maybe the right of broadcasting of sports programs can be prohibitive that WACK cannot afford, or even if it could afford the expense, the revenue it makes by attracting more audience cannot offset the high fee of purchasing the broadcasting right. It is arbitrary for the manager to aver that by including additional sports programs, the company of KICK can make more profits.

To sum up, the manager fails to substantiate his claim that by adjusting its broadcast schedule, the television station KICK can increase its audience share and making more porfits because the evidence cited in this analysis does not level strong support to what the manager maintains. To make the argument more convincing, the manager should have to provide more information to verify that in the area of KICK, there is a large pool of audience who demand additional sports programs.Additionally, he would have to make a more comprehensive and thorough investigation to show that the revenue the station might make by including additional sports programs will outweigh the cost of implementing this action. Therefore, if the argument had included the given factors discussed above, it would have been more insightful and logically acceptable.

bluyskyUID: 2657245

请多指教，艰难！
WORDS: 472          TIME: 4Hours          DATE: 2009-8-1   

This memo recommends that in order to gain a larger audience share and thus increase company profits TV station KICK should revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports coverage. To support this recommendation the manager points out that a national survey discloses that a sizeable majority of men would like to see additional sports programs on television. The manager also cites the TV audience share doubled experience of the television station WACK. However, careful scrutiny of the manager's evidence reveals that it lends no credible support to the manager's conclusion.
To begin with, the survey appears to suffer from two statistical problems, either of which renders the survey's result unreliable. First, the survey is conducted around the nation. However, it is entirely possible that the trend in the nation may not reflect the KICK's location's situation. Secondly, even if the national survey reflect the local trend, the survey involved only men audience and the manager provides no evidence that men are the main audience of the TV station KICK. Women and children may be the primary audience of this TV station and perhaps women and children prefer to see the teleplay or cartoons. In short, without better evidence that the survey is statistically reliable the manager cannot rely on it to draw any firm conclusions about adding more sports programs--let alone about increasing company profits.
In addition, it is unwarranted to infer from the example of the increasing sports programs in TV station WACK that KICK will also gain more audience share by following the same revision of the broadcast schedule. First, the reason of the WACK's audience share increase may not be the increase of the sports programs, but cutting some bad news programs. Secondly, no evidence given to proved that the WACK and the KICK have the same environment. Maybe the WACK's trump program is about sports, but the KICK's trump program is about news or TV shopping. Or maybe there are too many sports programs in the current KICK's broadcast schedule, what we should do is to do these sports programs better or cut some bad ones. Thirdly, the manager show nothing about the difference between the two TV stations' ratio of the audience's gender, which might be great different. So, the WACK's example provides little support that the KICK should increase the sports programs and then achieve more audience share.
In sum, the manager’s evidence accomplishes little toward supporting the manager’s argument for raise more sports programs. To further bolster the argument the manager must provide more detailed evidence, perhaps by way of a reliable survey, that people within KICK's watching area would like to see more additional sports programs. The manager must also show that the television station KICK need more sports programs not the music or news programs necessarily to increase its' audience share.

bluyskyUID: 2657245

改了楼上美眉的文章，一点真诚坦率的看法。。。

Based on the ungrounded assumption and dubious evidence, the manager of television station KICK draws the conclusion that KICK should revise its broadcast schedule to include more sports programs in order to attract more audience in the area and thus increase profits for the company. To substantiate this conclusion, the manager cites a national survey which shows that a sizeable majority of men would prefer watching additional sports programs on TV. He also points out that WACK, another television station has doubled its audience share in its area by increasing sports broadcasts. At first glance, this argument appears to somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that it omits some substantial concerns that should be addressed in the argument.

To begin with, the manager made a fallacy of changing scope. He assumes that the nationwide statistics that men enjoys (去掉s,单复数错误)watching additional sports programs would be true in every part of the country. Maybe in the area that KICK covers, men enjoy watching more crime themed TV shows instead of sports games. There is no evidence to show that in this area men prefer additional sports games to other types of TV programs. （此处还有一个点可以攻击：调查是针对men，也许women and children are the KICK’s main audience.）

Next, the manager made a concurrence fallacy and assumed that the television station WACK doubled its audience share by including additional sports programs. This assumption is not necessarily true since there may be numerous other factors that enabled WACK to double its audience share. For example, WACK could have broadcasted some popular TV shows, like Sex and the City on HBO, or Desperate Housewives on ABC that attracted more audience to view its programs. Or perhaps, WACK could have hired humerous（humorous误拼吧） and creative talk show hosts who presides(preside单复数错误) the show very well so that it attracted a number of new watchers of the program. Without ruling out such possibilities, the manager cannot aver that indeed, it is the additional sports programs that helped WACK to gain a larger audience share.（这段感觉有被恶意放大的嫌疑，个人觉得，就是展开的话，一句话就够了。这一个点，单独成一大段，有点过火。）

Furthermore, even assuming that there is a strong correlation between additional sports programs and increasing number of audience in the area of WACK, the manager made a false analogy between the two areas. The area where KICK covers can be inherently different from the area of WACK. Maybe, for example, it could be truen（true） that WACK covers an area that possesses some great sports teams, such as the Chicaco(Chicago) Bulls, or Los Angeles Lakers, while KICK covers an area of Iowan small towns. It is also possible when KICK changes its broadcast schedule(schedule) to include more sports programs by reducing other programs, the audience share may even decrease since a number of audience may be merely interested in the programs KICK shows currently.

Even assuming when KICK follows the same strategy as WACK, namely, to increase its sports broadcasts, it can increase its audience share in the area, the company may not necessarily make more profit. Maybe the right of broadcasting of sports programs can be prohibitive that WACK cannot afford, or even if it could afford the expense, the revenue it makes by attracting more audience cannot offset the high fee of purchasing the broadcasting right. It is arbituray(arbitrary) for the manager to aver that by including additional sports programs, the company of KICK can make more profits.

To sum up, the manager fails to substantiate his claim that by adjusting its broadcast schedule, the television station KICK can increase its audience share and making more profits(porfits) because the evidence cited in this analysis does not level strong support to what the manager maintains. To make the argument more convincing, the manager should have to provide more information to verify that in the area of KICK, there is a large pool of audience who demand additional sports programs. Additionally, he would have to make a more comprehensive and thorough investigation to show that the revenue the station might make by including additional sports programs will outweigh the cost of implementing this action. Therefore, if the argument had included the given factors discussed above, it would have been more insightful and logically acceptable.

(总体感觉：语言方面<我自己本身就很菜>-_-，有少部分误拼。“true”用的过多了，感觉，可以替换不？语气方面，是不是还可以正式点，书面化点？
段落方面：建议，第三段和第四段合并，这篇有600多字，两段压缩一下，就perfectl了，个人感觉。)

shevavaUID: 2574709

不好意思...下面同学自行解决...可以请组员帮改一下...

yesrushUID: 2443769

改的是shallwetalk1990的文章

It stands to reason that the points in this argument should be logical, cause of its well-presented statement. Grounding on a nationwide survey and the suppose that station WACK hold double audience than before cause of its increasing sports broadcasts, the manager accordingly advices that  station KICK takes measures as WACK's. However, when we have a deep thought, we will find some logical confusions.

Firstly, considering the reliablity of the survey in this argument, manager should calculate uncertain factors of it. Nationwide survey usually represents the national average but not local level, so it doesn't carry much conviction. Another questional point in this survey appears that objects of this investigation are all men, who can not take place all audience for granted. Without knowing the proportion of men audience, it also can be supposed that a considerable majority of audience are women who may be significant factor in determining the tend of program.（为什么女人要考虑进去，如果能进一步说女人不喜欢看体育节目就更好了）

Secondly, in spite of the survey that can not deputize for all audience and all location, the hypothesis that WACK succeed in the quantity of audience owing to  the rising sports programs seems groundless. It looks still unknownable that what other mesures station WACK do to contribution its audience, this mesures  may be the major reasons of  its doubled audience. Are most new audience turn to WACK men? Do most new audience turn to WACK cause of sports broadcasts?  Do WACK make a good profit? （这几个疑问排比很精彩）All the questions can't be answered without verifying.

Finally, the suggestion that KICK should broadcast more sports programs to gain more audience and company profits seems feeble. It apeares reasonable, (加入however), the manager draw an analogy between KICK and WACK incorrerctly, they may own dissimmilar audience gourps which make them different everywhere. Another neglected problem is that whether KICK demand more sports broadcast, maybe it is possess of more sports broadcasts than WACK's. Even if increasing sports programs only make WACK increasing audience,  it can't help KICK as same. The significant question that if this measure can increase company profit is in front of all, and no evidence can prove it.  

Overall, the manager did apply himself into his argument, while at the same time he was making lots of logical mistakes. His job should be accepted, however, the conclusion should not. The manager of KICK should evaluate all the possible alternatives and the cause makes WACK rising audience, also the clues of his reasoning.（最后一段模板痕迹比较严重，除了KICK、WACK、rising audience这几个词，其他全是模板，建议选一个字数少一些的模板，然后填入更多与题目有关的信息）

shevavaUID: 2574709

你的我改了，在板凳 10# bluysky

bluyskyUID: 2657245

14# shevava

看到了。3ky