Issue 50 拍我！！的处女作吧！！！求求求求你！！

kiki2865UID：2689569

大家既然来了~
就不吝赐教赐教~？？
滴水之恩定当涌泉相报报报报报！！！~


TOPIC: ISSUE50 -
"In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."



Seductive as the assertion may be, many other factors should be concerned,
when determining whether faculty in relevant professions, to spend time working outside the academic, exerts a positive impact on improving their quality of instruction.

The idea that all faculty should spend time to relevant work outside the campus is an illusion. What can probably be claimed with more justification is that whether they should relevantly work outside depends on what disciplines they teach. Given that some disciplines aim at doing research or experiment in laboratory, there seems no certain work outsides the academic world that suits them. What could a historian or a philosopher do in the outside world of the campus while perhaps their main concern is just to stay inside the academic where they are familiar with to spark or analyse theories with myriad reference material. As to chemist or physicist, their large precision and professional equipments for experiment are in their laboratory, admittedly, they are far too willing to embrace the notion that doing research in academic is their way to improve instruction.

It is true that the supposition does not serves to be feasible to the above-mentioned subjects, however, spending time working outside the academic plays an essential role in some utilitarian disciplines, for instance, architecture, economics, marketing, etc.. Faculty of these disciplines require practical experience as well as theories in their instruction, that is, they spend time working outside the academic world may eventually contribute to the teaching quality. A marketing teacher getting a job at a department store helps him to know better the mentality of customers, how the products are sold and set will tend to a better sale, and so on. Moreover, having working experience in the society makes it empirical for faculty to provide students with future career guidance. How inspiring when the economic faculty tell the students, after testing in the real economic world outside, with what they learned in academic, they can still make a profit during the recession period.

Common sense makes us believe that, in disciplines such as art or literature, faculty working in relevant profession outside have a positive influence on their instruction. Some people maintain that all what art or literature teachers ought to do is composing inside the library or somewhere of the academic. Clearly, they lose sight of the importance of afflatus as what these faculty need for their composing, which sometimes can not be stimulated in a normal daily place. Working outside means meeting different people, working in a art gallery means immersing in the world of art , that is obviously going to enlighten the afflatus of faculty more than they are trapped in the academic.

Beneficial as faculty spending time working outside the academic world may seem to be, in order to improve the quality of instruction, diversity of disciplines must be concerned.

glfoxUID：2677904

要我写，我会先承认，再反驳。

kiki2865UID：2689569

2# glfox

那样比较好吗？

gottliebUID：2459111

先占楼，去看考场 回来拍你

kiki2865UID：2689569

4# gottlieb
咋咋咋。。这么久呢。。。

gottliebUID：2459111

TOPIC: ISSUE50 -
"In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."



Seductive（上来我就不认识，O(∩_∩)O~） as the assertion may be, many other factors should be concerned,（这个要改成不同的科目有不同的特性是不是更好些？）
when determining whether faculty in relevant professions, to spend time working outside the academic, exerts a positive impact on improving their quality of instruction.

The idea that all faculty should spend time to relevant work outside the campus is an illusion. What can probably be claimed with more justification is that whether they should relevantly work outside depends on what disciplines they teach. Given that some disciplines aim at doing research or experiment in laboratory, there seems no certain work outsides the academic world that suits them. What could a historian or a philosopher do in the outside world of the campus while perhaps their main concern is just to stay inside the academic where they are familiar with to spark or analyse theories with myriad reference material. As to chemist or physicist, their large precision and professional equipments for experiment are in their laboratory, admittedly, they are far too willing to embrace the notion that doing research in academic is their way to improve instruction.（语言好呀，我还是满篇的单句呢，羡慕）

It is true that the supposition does not serves to be feasible to the above-mentioned subjects, however, spending time working outside the academic plays an essential role in some utilitarian（这个词用的有点） disciplines, for instance, architecture, economics, marketing, etc.. Faculty of these disciplines require practical experience as well as theories in their instruction, that is, they spend time working outside the academic world may eventually contribute to the teaching quality. A marketing teacher getting a job at a department store helps him to know better the mentality（这个词） of customers, how the products are sold and set will tend to a better sale, and so on. Moreover, having working experience in the society makes it empirical for faculty to provide students with future career guidance. How inspiring when the economic faculty tell the students, after testing in the real economic world outside, with what they learned in academic, they can still make a profit during the recession period.（好句子）

Common sense makes us believe that, in disciplines such as art or literature, faculty working in relevant profession outside have a positive influence on their instruction. Some people maintain that all what art or literature teachers ought to do is composing inside the library or somewhere of the academic. Clearly, they lose sight of the importance of afflatus（好难的词） as what these faculty need for their composing, which sometimes can not be stimulated in a normal daily place. Working outside means meeting different people, working in a art gallery means immersing in the world of art , that is obviously going to enlighten the afflatus of faculty more than they are trapped in the academic.

Beneficial as faculty spending time working outside the academic world may seem to be, in order to improve the quality of instruction, diversity of disciplines must be concerned.
整个文章没什么好说的，很牛！从语法到句法都没有问题，思路清晰。

stanzyUID：2629386

我也来拍拍，积攒RP.
总体来讲没看懂，我想楼主能不能给一个中文的提纲。看了这篇文章，到底是faculty应该参加其他项目呢，还是不应该呢？还是既应该有不应该呢？
另外，文章中一处There seem...后面好像还是要加上to be的吧？ 不然没有宾语？（我的语法也不太好）
总体来讲我觉得句子还是太长了，ETS喜欢看长句子吗？就因为句子长，我居然没看懂......

kiki2865UID：2689569

6# gottlieb
啊~谢谢夸奖啊！~
其实都是老师教的。。。

可是我无论打字还是构思
都超慢。。。

问题很大！~唉。。

kiki2865UID：2689569

7# stanzy
中文提纲就算了吧
7号 就考了 要move on 了

我的意思是 faculty 该按专业 有的该 有的不该

另外，文章中一处There seem...后面好像还是要加上to be的吧？ 不然没有宾语？（我的语法也不太好）
“there seems no certain work outsides the academic world that suits them” 这句吗？宾语是 no certain work 啊~

总体来讲我觉得句子还是太长了，ETS喜欢看长句子吗？就因为句子长，我居然没看懂

啊~谢谢你啊！！~
老师说句子复杂显得逻辑性较强。。
没留意，长句太多了。。

princess617UID：2649486

不错的文文~学习学习~~~

弱问楼主，写这么一篇花多少时间？

我现在在时间上超级纠结~~~不限时得写3小时/issue
限时的花45min/400字以下，而且残缺不全。。。

纠结ing, 911就考了。。。

kiki2865UID：2689569

10# princess617

跟你差不多~~
因为是第一篇
没计时
久到我所不齿的程度!

stanzyUID：2629386

我还是坚持自己的看法，要么There be,要么It seems that 。
我也要考了阿......15号。还在纠结呢。我有一些想法，但是不知道怎么展开论述。另外，据说厦大的键盘不好使。没关系没关系！我学过弹钢琴，不知道有没有用？
另外，如果我这次失败了，我就会去考第二次。那个时候一定多上这个论坛多交流。等我有勇气来论坛的时候，都太晚了阿......唉......