完了完了 今天上海aw！！！大家帮帮我吧

augustmanUID: 2659820

今天财大考的
issue是
221 the chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history.

180Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moral behavior cannot be legislated.

argument是
Argument 51-The following appeared in a medical newsletter.
"Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment."高频第一 本来一切都很顺利，issue是选了221，之前写过许多历史 argument也写过了issue用了30分钟就写完了 40行 应该500多字了 写了许多例子argument写完还有7分钟 写了34行 考完以后本来心情很好的 可是觉得越来越不对劲 后来看作文书221题目是： 研究历史主要好处就是消除了人们这样的错觉：一个时代的人与以前任何一个时代的人有显著的不同而我理解成历史研究的主要好处是让我们知道一个时代的人与以前任何一个时代的人有显著的不同第一段说历史的确有让我们明白两种人不同的作用。说古代人碰不到现代人这样那样的问题 人口啊 能源啊第二段开头however 不同时代的人有很多相同之处 customs啊之类 古代对现代很多影响啊第三段说历史有很多作用 可是只写了一个方面 一个准备好的例子也忘记用了 那这样的issue会有几分啊？ 纠结中

xueyiUID: 2647060

套用草木大人的一句惯用语：
考完了，就不要想了，安心准备笔试吧！
加油！

augustmanUID: 2659820

那这样真的错了么。。。。。。。

xueyiUID: 2647060

没错。
issue不是考你观点的对错，而是看你自己提炼的观点是不是能得到有效论证。
放轻松，issue本身不是政治论述题。

草木也知愁UID: 2487572

分数不是仅仅由你说的那些定的 而且评分标准给的清清楚楚 想知道的话 自己对照看就行了

xueyi已经说了我那句话了 我就不罗嗦了