寄托天下
查看: 1285|回复: 5

[活动] Q的12月3日综合作文 有疑问的画 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
139
寄托币
1306
注册时间
2009-10-6
精华
0
帖子
22
发表于 2009-12-3 17:41:37 |显示全部楼层
超时2分钟,说话太绕了吧大概。

The reading passage points out three questionable details in a painting with a woman in white bonnet, and claimed that it is not Rembrandl's work. In the lecture, the speaker points out that even though the details mentioned in the reading is true, the painting actually was created by Rembrandl with results of recent examine of the painting.

First, the fur collar which shows inconsistency with the woman's way of dressing has been proved to be added to the original painting several hundreds of years later, for the purpose of increasing the painting's value. This explains why the color doesn't match the woman's linen cap in this painting.

Consequentely, the fact above can also explain how the woman's face seems to be illuminated by light reflected from below. With the fur color which didn't exist in the original painting removed, the woman is wearing a light lolor cloff, and this goes along with the light in her face, which perfectly reflect Rembrandl's level of painting.

Finally, examines show that the original wood panel was in fact a whole piece, which fits Rembrandl's style. It even came from the same tree as another panel of Rembrandl's painting, showing that the painting of woman in bonnet really is his work. Whoever added the fur color to this painting must have added several pieces of wood on, in order to make the whole panel large enough for the color.

After the analisis above, the speaker successfully proved that Rembrandl is of no doubt the artist who did the painting.
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
happyfaith2008 + 1 估计我会被分到改你的作文,我就乘热打铁先 ...

总评分: 声望 + 1   查看全部投币

不抛弃,不放弃,那些做到这六个字的人,抛弃了什么,又放弃了什么?
班长,我又想明白啦!
我不知道后面的路有多长,可我想坚持着跑完全程。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
388
寄托币
4463
注册时间
2009-10-11
精华
1
帖子
89

荣誉版主 寄托与我 IBT Zeal Sagittarius射手座

发表于 2009-12-3 19:15:07 |显示全部楼层
不仅超时了,也超字数了吧?嘿嘿!:lol
估计我就会被分到改你的作文,乘热打铁,我先来踩踩。


J
7 Z9 ]* n6 A. ~5 H- o
The reading passage points out three questionable details in a painting with a woman in white bonnet, and claimed that it is not Rembrandl's work. In the lecture, the speaker points out that even though the details mentioned in the reading is true, the painting actually was created by Rembrandl with results of recent examine of the painting.* P1 [) U0 n* X: a1 g
0 j0 l2 f0 ~( p4 [9 Y+ O

First, the fur collar which shows inconsistency with the woman's way of dressing has been proved to be added to the original painting several hundreds of years later, for the purpose of increasing the painting's value. This explains why the color doesn't match the woman's linen cap in this painting.

Consequentely, the fact above can also explain how the woman's face seems to be illuminated by light reflected from below. With the fur color which didn't exist in the original painting removed, the woman is wearing a light lolor cloff, and this goes along with the light in her face, which perfectly reflectreflects)Rembrandl's level of painting.9 K4 M$ S  v$ c1 k
- g- ^( r% [' O

Finally, examines show that the original wood panel was in fact a whole piece, which fits Rembrandl's style. It even came from the same tree as another panel of Rembrandl's painting, showing that the painting of woman in bonnet really is his work. Whoever added the fur color to this painting must have added several pieces of wood on, in order to make the whole panel large enough for the color(这个不太明白呀!和颜色有关么?我没听出来。).4 [, m0 q" ()a2 l- M9 o  z
! {4 p& E  Q2 D/ j' o" S+ q
After the analisis above, the speaker successfully proved that Rembrandl is of no doubt(,no doubt,加两个逗号貌似更好) the artist who did the painting.

语言真是顶呱呱!我要向名字同学好好学习呀!我都不是严格按时间写的作文。20分钟写不下来。555555
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
名字是个词儿 + 1 积极主动,颇有先见之明啊

总评分: 声望 + 1   查看全部投币

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
139
寄托币
1306
注册时间
2009-10-6
精华
0
帖子
22
发表于 2009-12-3 19:22:13 |显示全部楼层
不好意思,我本来是想写collar:L
最后那一段我想写的是 of no doubt 是一整个词组。不知道这样写对不对。
03好积极啊,呵呵:handshake
不抛弃,不放弃,那些做到这六个字的人,抛弃了什么,又放弃了什么?
班长,我又想明白啦!
我不知道后面的路有多长,可我想坚持着跑完全程。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
3
寄托币
239
注册时间
2008-11-5
精华
0
帖子
6
发表于 2009-12-5 00:37:22 |显示全部楼层
The passage points out three questionable details in a painting with a woman in white bonnet; and claims(时态一致) that it is not Rembrandl's work. On the contrary, in the lecture, the speaker believes that even though the details mentioned in the reading are true, the painting was created by Rembrandl with recent evidences.' G: d& Q3 m) L& |

First, the fur collar which shows inconsistency with the woman's way of dressing has been proved to be added to the original painting several hundreds of years later, for the purpose of increasing the painting's value. This explains why the collar doesn't match the woman's linen cap in this painting.

Consequently, the fact above can also explain why the woman's face seems to be illuminated by light reflected below. With the fur collar which didn't exist in the original painting removed, the woman is wearing a light color cloff, and this goes along with the light in her face, which perfectly reflect Rembrandl's level of painting.(
第二句结构太复杂了,建议用短句子说)

Finally, examines show that the original wood panel was in fact a whole piece which fits Rembrandl's style. And it even came from the same tree as another panel of Rembrandl's painting, conforming that the painting of a woman in bonnet really is his work. Whoever added the fur collar to this painting must have added several pieces of wood on, in order to make the whole panel more grand and valuable.! G1 N" J8 n! m1 d0 R/ ~1 l8 f/ m
( ]8 o* r* i; y: |% I
Due to the analysis above, the speaker has successfully proved that Rembrandl is of no doubt the artist who did the painting. (
感觉这么说太复杂)

总体来说,思路很清晰,内容很detail,有些句子结构过于复杂,个人感觉用简单句效果会好些。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
2
寄托币
201
注册时间
2009-9-6
精华
0
帖子
5
发表于 2009-12-5 09:01:01 |显示全部楼层
正好看到一篇范文,满分的,转给大家,转自 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_633e18c10100g55g.html

The lecture revises the idea presented in the text that Rembrandt was not the artist who painted the famous painting "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet”.

The inconsistency between the white cap, which identifies the woman as a servant, and the expensive fur collar she wears dissolves as the Professor explains that the fur collar was apparently painted over the original painting to increase its worth by displaying an aristocratic woman.

In addition, the assumption that light and shadow in the painting do not fit together is refuted by the fact that in the original painting, the woman wears a light cloth that illuminated her face. Thus the presentation of light and shadow was indeed very realistic and accurate, as it is characteristic of Rembrandt’s paintings.

Finally, the mystery of the panel consisting of patches glued together is also solved in the lecture. Actually, the wood panel was later enlarged to make it more grand and valuable, but the original painting was painted on a single panel, as Rembrandt would have done it. Furthermore, the wood is of the same tree used in other Rembrandt paintings, like the "Self-Portrait with a Hat”.

All this information points to Rembrandt as the painter of the controversial painting.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
139
寄托币
1306
注册时间
2009-10-6
精华
0
帖子
22
发表于 2009-12-5 10:45:01 |显示全部楼层
果然还是满分范文比较地道啊
学习ing~
我自己写的句子,就算把语法拼写啥的全都纠正了,也还是味道不对,故意绕着说话的样子。不够native吧
不抛弃,不放弃,那些做到这六个字的人,抛弃了什么,又放弃了什么?
班长,我又想明白啦!
我不知道后面的路有多长,可我想坚持着跑完全程。

使用道具 举报

RE: Q的12月3日综合作文 有疑问的画 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Q的12月3日综合作文 有疑问的画
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1036867-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部