寄托天下
楼主: 豆腐店的86

[感想日志] 1006G[REBORN FROM THE ASHES组]备考日记 by 豆腐店的86——越来越快(新) [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-15 00:30:43 |显示全部楼层
发完邮件 好好睡一觉吧
今天还真是充实··
让生活这样充实下去吧

BTW 周四辩论赛决赛!
加油啊!!!
Synergy Squad, go go go!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
93
注册时间
2006-1-23
精华
0
帖子
1
发表于 2009-12-15 03:02:25 |显示全部楼层
wan an~
八面玲珑的K小姐❀

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-15 10:36:50 |显示全部楼层
47# sharktwin

anan ~~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-15 10:39:32 |显示全部楼层
“大早起来”,接着做第四次作业·~
加油吧!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-15 11:32:02 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 豆腐店的86 于 2009-12-15 16:00 编辑

第四次作业第一篇
出处:https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=990958&;highlight
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ARGUMENT206 - The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Parkville Daily Newspaper.
"Throughout the country last year, as more and more children below the age of nine participated in youth-league softball and soccer, over 80,000 of these young players suffered injuries. When interviewed for a recent study, youth-league softball players in several major cities also reported psychological pressure from coaches and parents to win games. Furthermore, education experts say that long practice sessions for these sports take away time that could be used for academic activities. Since the disadvantages apparently outweigh any advantages, we in Parkville should discontinue organized athletic competition for children under nine."
WORDS: 384

TIME: 00:30:00
DATE: 2009-8-1 13:58:06


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this argument, the author concludes that Parkville should discontinue organized athletic competition for children under nine. To support his conclusion, the author points out that over 80,000 of young players suffered injuries throughout the country last year. And he also cites that youth-league softball players reported pressure form coaches and parents in several big cities and these sports take away time for academic activities. However, the argument suffers a few flaws.

To begin with, the author falsely assumes that children under nine in Parkville suffer injuries just like those throughout the country.
(这句话下面的平行结构有问题,first后面接的是段首这句话所叙述的内容,是一个deduction;而second后面所叙述的内容不属于段首第一句话的演绎内容。或者说,段首第一句话的统领做的得不到位)First, the child in Parkville may have different interests in sports, such as basketball. Second, the author fails to provide the number of children who is under nine and suffered injuries throughout the country last year. Perhaps only a few children under nine suffered from injuries.(题目明确提到,over 80,000 of these young players suffered injuries. 这个young players指代那些小于9岁的孩子) Third, the author fails to prove that the children get injuries because of taking sports rather than other possibilities.(这一点的意思应该是说这些校运动员受伤可能不是因为运动而伤,可能是因为其他的原因。但是这里没有具体表达清楚,比较遗憾) All these scenarios, if true, will undermine the author's conclusion.


In addition, the author unjustifiably claims that children in Parkvill receive pressure from coaches and parents. The study is interviewed in several big cities, we are not informed whether Parkville is a big city. Even assuming that it is a big city, the author still cannot apply the study to Parkville.(应该强调大城市与小城市的区别,可能是生活节奏,教育要求所致,要具体深入探讨,而不是点到为止) There are maybe differences between Parkville and other cities. Perhaps Parkville has stricter regulations to coaches, or perhaps the competition in Parkville is not so serious.(类似的问题,好的教练到底有哪些专业素养,可以具体点说)

Furthermore, it is unwarranted to claim that these sports take away time from academic activities. First, we are not informed how many hours are used for sports and academic activities. Perhaps sports time is far less than the time for academic activities. Second, sports may help to do academic activities better. Without ruling out these possibilities, it is unwise to discontinue organized competition.

Last but not least, the author suggests too hastily to discontinue all the competition. Even if some competition is dangerous, some others may be good for children. Common sense tells me that children need to take sports.(与全文口吻不符,先得突兀+凑字数) The disadvantage of discontinue may outweigh the advantage.

To sum up, the author fails to substantiate the conclusion that Parkville should discontinue organized athletic competition for children under nine. The author need further information and reliable study to make the conclusion convincing.


点评:
全文模板化严重,很明显模板部分和写作部分的语言表达有一个层次上的差异
分析太表面,点都出来了,只是没有深层分析
全文大结构清晰,值得学习,但可能也是应为套模板的缘故吧
每一段的逻辑结构比较勉强,点之间太过跳跃 没有有效衔接

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-16 23:32:49 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 豆腐店的86 于 2009-12-17 16:28 编辑


第四次作业,第二篇
出处:https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=990800&highlight
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARGUMENT131 - The following appeared in an environmental newsletter published in Tria Island.

"The marine sanctuary on Tria Island was established to protect certain marine mammals. Its regulations ban dumping and offshore oil drilling within 20 miles of Tria, but fishing is not banned. Currently many fish populations in Tria's waters are declining, a situation blamed on pollution. In contrast, the marine sanctuary on Omni Island has regulations that ban dumping, offshore oil drilling, and fishing within 10 miles of Omni and Omni reports no significant decline in its fish populations. Clearly, the decline in fish populations in Tria's waters is the result of overfishing, not pollution. Therefore, the best way to restore Tria's fish populations and to protect all of Tria's marine wildlife is to abandon our regulations and adopt those of Omni."

WORDS: 314
TIME: 00:30:00
DATE: 2009-7-31 21:03:35




In this argument, the author concludes that the Tria Island should abandon its regulations and adopt Omni's in order to restore its fish populations and protect all of its marine (certain marine mammals)wildlife. To support his conclusion, the author cites the example of Omni Island which has regulations that ban fishing. However, the argument suffers from a few flaws.

To begin with, the author assumes too hastily that the decline in fish populations in Tria's waters should blame on overfishing.
Firstly, there are many other nature factors which would influence the fish population, such as water temperature, spaning season, extreme weather phenomenon and so forth. Secondly,
the author fails to prove that the banned actions have not happened. If the water is polluted, the fish population will probably decrease.

Besides, the oil may also float from other place. (三个分点其实内在有逻辑联系的,在文字表达上没有展现出来,先得逻辑相对松散。可以这样写,首先,即便被禁止了,不能保证污染没有发生,因为没有材料证明,并且公海的石油泄漏可能对该地区有影响。再者,除了污染和过度捕捞,还有其他因素会导致鱼减少....... 这样写,几个点的联系就更紧密些)All these sceranios, if true, will undermine the author's conclusion that overfishing should be responsible for decline in fish populations.

In additon, even assuming that overfishing leads to the decline in fish populations, the author falsely concludes that Tria should follow the example of Omni. The author overlooks the differences between the two Islands. There might be disparity in Island weather, water quality, fish sorts and so on. These defferences will (might)make Omni's regulations unsuccessful in Tria. What's more, the author doesn't prove that the fish caught in Tria is within 10 miles of Tria, which will undermine the conclusion.(套模板太严重,这句话根本就不足undermine 这个结论,文字表达没有达到这么强的逻辑表现效果)

Further more, even assuming that the Omni's regulation will success in Tria, the argument still has some flaws. First, the Omni's regulations might not be the best one. There are may be better ones(奇怪的表达法) such as stricker ban on dumping. Second, the Omni's regulation cannot guarantee to protect all the marine wildlife.

To sum up, the author fails to substantiate his conclusion that Tria should adopt Omni's regulations. To support his conclusion, the author should provides more information.(要具体下去,什么样的材料才足以证明?)



点评:
跟上面一篇的缺点大同小异
有一点需要补充 这两篇文章都有个特点就是所有的例子 论点都是平行的,没有任何层进关系,导致每一段都多次出现 first second third`~~
其实有几点是有递进关系的 这样运用的thus therefore的连接词 会显得论据更加结实,然后再推到undermine blar blar blar~~ 这样程度才够~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-18 23:30:37 |显示全部楼层
忙完上网·~
洗澡回来做今天的任务~~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-19 01:33:28 |显示全部楼层
A special report on climate change and the carbon economy
Getting warmer
Dec 3rd 2009 From The Economist print edition
生词
读多遍才懂的句子
好句子,好表达法
=====================================================
So far the effort to tackle global warming has achieved little. Copenhagen offers the chance to do better, says Emma Duncan (interviewed here)
Illustration by M. Morgenstern

THE mountain bark beetle is a familiar pest in the forests of British Columbia. Its population rises and falls unpredictably, destroying clumps of pinewood as it peaks which then regenerate as the bug recedes. But Scott Green, who studies forest ecology at the University of Northern British Columbia, says the current outbreak is “unprecedented in recorded history: a natural background-noise disturbance has become a major outbreak. We’re looking at the loss of 80% of our pine forest cover.”* Other parts of North America have also been affected, but the damage in British Columbia is particularly severe, and particularly troubling in a province whose economy is dominated by timber.

Three main explanations for this disastrous outbreak suggest themselves. It could be chance. Populations do fluctuate dramatically and unexpectedly. It could be the result of management practices. British Columbia’s woodland is less varied than it used to be, which helps a beetle that prefers pine. Or
it could be caused by the higher temperatures that now prevail in northern areas, allowing beetles to breed more often in summer and survive in greater numbers through the winter.

The Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which the United Nations adopted at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, is now 17 years old. Its aim was “to achieve stabilisation of greenhouse-gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system”. The Kyoto protocol, which set about realising those aims, was signed in 1997 and came into force in 2005. Its first commitment period runs out in 2012, and implementing a new one is expected to take at least three years, which is why the 15th conference of the parties to the UNFCCC that starts in Copenhagen on December 7th is such a big deal. Without a new global agreement, there is not much chance of averting serious climate change.

Since the UNFCCC was signed, much has changed, though more in the biosphere than the human sphere. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the body set up to establish a scientific consensus on what is happening, heat waves, droughts, floods and serious hurricanes have increased in frequency over the past few decades; it reckons those trends are all likely or very likely to have been caused by human activity and will probably continue. Temperatures by the end of the century might be up by anything from 1.1ºC to 6.4ºC.

In most of the world the climate changes to date are barely perceptible or hard to pin on warming. In British Columbia and farther north the effects of climate change are clearer. Air temperatures in the Arctic are rising about twice as fast as in the rest of the world. The summer sea ice is thinning and shrinking. The past three years have seen the biggest losses since proper record-keeping started in 1979. Ten years ago scientists reckoned that summer sea-ice would be gone by the end of this century. Now they expect it to disappear within a decade or so.

Since sea-ice is already in the water, its melting has little effect on sea levels. Those are determined by temperature (warmer water takes up more room) and the size of the Greenland and Antarctic ice caps. The glaciers in south-eastern Greenland have picked up speed. Jakobshavn Isbrae, the largest of them, which drains 6% of Greenland’s ice, is now moving at 12km a year—twice as fast as it was when the UNFCCC was signed—and its “calving front”, where it breaks down into icebergs, has retreated by 20km in six years. That is part of the reason why the sea level is now rising at 3-3.5mm a year, twice the average annual rate in the 20th century.

As with the mountain bark beetle, it is not entirely clear why this is happening. The glaciers could be retreating because of one of the countless natural oscillations in the climate that scientists do not properly understand. If so, the glacial retreat could well stop, as it did in the middle of the 20th century after a 100-year retreat. But the usual causes of natural variability do not seem to explain the current trend, so scientists incline to the view that it is man-made. It is therefore likely to persist unless mankind starts to behave differently—and there is not much sign of that happening.

Carbon-dioxide emissions are now 30% higher than they were when the UNFCCC was signed 17 years ago. Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 equivalent (carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases) reached 430 parts per million last year, compared with 280ppm before the industrial revolution. At the current rate of increase they could more than treble by the end of the century, which would mean a 50% risk of a global temperature increase of 5ºC. To put that in context, the current average global temperature is only 5ºC warmer than the last ice age. Such a rise would probably lead to fast-melting ice sheets, rising sea levels, drought, disease and collapsing agriculture in poor countries, and mass migration. But nobody really knows, and nobody wants to know.

Some scientists think that the planet is already on an irreversible journey to dangerous warming. A few climate-change sceptics think the problem will right itself. Either may be correct. Predictions about a mechanism as complex as the climate cannot be made with any certainty. But the broad scientific consensus is that serious climate change is a danger, and this newspaper believes that, as an insurance policy against a catastrophe that may never happen, the world needs to adjust its behaviour to try to avert that threat.

The problem is not a technological one. The human race has almost all the tools it needs to continue leading much the sort of life it has been enjoying without causing a net increase in greenhouse-gas concentrations in the atmosphere. Industrial and agricultural processes can be changed. Electricity can be produced by wind, sunlight, biomass or nuclear reactors, and cars can be powered by biofuels and electricity. Biofuel engines for aircraft still need some work before they are suitable for long-haul flights, but should be available soon.

Nor is it a question of economics. Economists argue over the sums (see article), but broadly agree that greenhouse-gas emissions can be curbed without flattening the world economy.
A hard sell

It is all about politics. Climate change is the hardest political problem the world has ever had to deal with. It is a prisoner’s dilemma, a free-rider problem and the tragedy of the commons all rolled into one. At issue is the difficulty of allocating the cost of collective action and trusting other parties to bear their share of the burden. At a city, state and national level, institutions that can resolve such problems have been built up over the centuries. But climate change has been a worldwide worry for only a couple of decades. Mankind has no framework for it. The UN is a useful talking shop, but it does not get much done.

The closest parallel is the world trading system. This has many achievements to its name, but it is not an encouraging model. Not only is the latest round of negotiations mired in difficulty, but the World Trade Organisation’s task is child’s play compared with climate change. The benefits of concluding trade deals are certain and accrue in the short term. The benefits of mitigating climate change are uncertain, since scientists are unsure of the scale and consequences of global warming, and will mostly accrue many years hence. The need for action, by contrast, is urgent.

The problem will be solved only if the world economy moves from carbon-intensive to low-carbon—and, in the long term, to zero-carbon—products and processes. That requires businesses to change their investment patterns. And they will do so only if governments give them clear, consistent signals. This special report will argue that so far this has not happened. The policies adopted to avoid dangerous climate change have been partly misconceived and largely inadequate. They have sent too many wrong signals and not enough of the right ones.

That is partly because of the way the Kyoto protocol was designed. By trying to include all the greenhouse gases in a single agreement, it has been less successful than the less ambitious Montreal protocol, which cut ozone-depleting gases fast and cheaply. By including too many countries in detailed negotiations, it has reduced the chances of agreement. And by dividing the world into developed and developing countries, it has deepened a rift that is proving hard to close. Ultimately, though, the international agreement has fallen victim to domestic politics. Voters do not want to bear the cost of their elected leaders’ aspirations, and those leaders have not been brave enough to push them.

Copenhagen represents a second chance to make a difference. The aspirations are high, but so are the hurdles. The gap between the parties on the two crucial questions—emissions levels and money—remains large. America’s failure so far to pass climate-change legislation means that a legally binding agreement will not be reached at the conference. The talk is of one in Bonn, in six months’ time, or in Mexico City in a year.

To suggest that much has gone wrong is not to denigrate the efforts of the many people who have dedicated two decades to this problem. For mankind to get even to the threshold of a global agreement is a marvel. But any global climate deal will work only if the domestic policies through which it is implemented are both efficient and effective. If they are ineffective, nothing will change. If they are inefficient, they will waste money. And if taxpayers decide that green policies are packed with pork, they will turn against them.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tackle: to set about dealing with  <tackle the problem>
pest: an epidemic disease associated with high mortality
clumps:  a group of things clustered together  <a clump of bushes>
outbreak:  a sudden rise in the incidence of a disease  <an outbreak of measles>
unprecedented: having no precedent, UNEXAMPLED,史无前例的
chance: something that happens unpredictably without discernible human intention or observable cause
stabilisation: NOT FOUND
protocol: an original draft, minute, or record of a document or transaction
implement: CARRY OUT, ACCOMPLISH
consensus general agreement
reckons  ESTIMATE, COMPUTE  *reckon the height of a building*
oscillations  VARIATION, FLUCTUATION
context   the parts of a discourse that surround a word or passage and can throw light on its meaning
irreversible  not capable of going through a series of actions (as changes) backward
flatten  to make level or smooth
at issue  NOT FOUND
mire    a troublesome or intractable situation
accrue to come into existence as a legally enforceable claim
mitigate  to cause to become less harsh or hostile
misconceived 误解
inadequate    INSUFFICIENT 不充分
hurdles  BARRIER, OBSTACLE
denigrate  to deny the importance or validity of
marvel   intense surprise or interest
pork government funds, jobs, or favors distributed by politicians to gain political advantage
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

comment

Global warming has been a hot issue since decades ago. Organizations were founded to discuss this very issue involving countries form different continents. Unfortunately, even if they’ve made some agreements say Kyoto Protocol, some worlds’ dominating countries still hold their efforts for their political issues. As the article states, it is a “prisoner’s dilemma”, so that those who are aiming political achievements have to act like free-riders. And this is why China claims that it is planning to reduce its CO2 emotion by 40%, because, as an developing country, china is in need of funds and technology to make accomplish such a task, which is definitely has to be provided by developed countries, say USA. In this case, those who act as a beholder will have no choice but step up to support such a “global issue”.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-19 01:34:13 |显示全部楼层
好不容易才看完·~~
看来要好好看一篇文章 真是不容易··
睡觉咯·~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-19 10:52:36 |显示全部楼层
早起回顾一下晚上写的COMMENT~~
真是不知所云!
看来大晚上显然不能写东西~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-19 11:01:25 |显示全部楼层
看看Argument题目翻译修订
----------------------------------

107 The following appeared in an editorial in the Seatown newspaper.
Seatown has a large port exclusively for fishing boats, whose owners pay fees for the upkeep of the docks and for facilities for cleaning engines and repairing nets. In recent years, declining fish populations have decreased fishing revenue and forced many owners to stop fishing altogether. As a result, the port has a high vacancy rate and port managers are considering allowing pleasure boats, including cruise ships and other large vessels, to use the port in order to increase revenue. But allowing pleasure boats into the port would be a mistake, because the fishing boats would be forced out of the port. We should preserve the port for the fishing fleet, which, unlike pleasure boats, contributes to the prosperity of Seatown.""

Seatown拥有一个专供渔船使用的港口,其码头和设施的保养费、船只引擎的清洁费以及渔网的维修费则由这些渔船的主人们承担。 近年来,随着水域内鱼的总量的减少,渔业收入也在下降,这迫使许多渔船主完全停止捕鱼活动,进而导致港口泊位的空置率过高。港口经理们考虑允许休闲船只,包括油轮与其他大型游艇进入港口停泊以增加收入。但是允许这些船只的进入将是个错误,因为这样会强制渔船去别的地方停靠与休闲船只不同,渔船为Seatown带来了繁荣,我们应该为捕渔船队保留港口。

108 The following appeared in a Brenton newspaper.
The Brenton power plant draws water from Scott's River for its cooling system and releases the warmed water back into the river. The town council recommends that the plant install a more efficient cooling system that uses less water, claiming it will be more environmentally sound. However, in Uptown, where the new system is used, a study found that the complex network of pipes in the new system tends to accumulate algae. The build up of algae can be avoided by scrubbing the pipes, which is costly, or by adding an herbicide to the water in the pipes to prevent algae accumulation. But water containing the herbicide cannot be released back into the river and it is known that low water levels can harm river ecosystems accustomed to higher levels. Therefore, Brenton power plant should continue to use the old cooling system exclusively.

Brenton电厂从Scott河中取水用于冷却系统,然后将升温的水排放到河中。市委建议工厂换一套更有效的冷却系统以减少冷却水的使用量,他们认为这样更加环保。不过,Uptown使用了新系统,而一份研究表明,新系统里复杂的管道网会聚集水藻。管道擦洗工程可以防止海藻的滋生,但这项工程成本太高。在管道排出的水中添加除草剂也可以清除淤积的水藻,但是添加了除草剂的水是不能释放到河里的。而且我们知道低水位将会对习惯了高水位的生态系统造成严重破坏。(这句话还是有疑问,这里的level指的时水位么?如果是,前后逻辑完全连不上,如果不是,其指的是水质的等级的话,在英语中也不能只字不提水质就对水质做等级划分吧。求解!)因此Brenton电厂应该继续沿用旧的冷却系统。


109 The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Maple City newspaper.
Twenty years ago Pine City established strict laws designed to limit the number of new buildings that could be constructed in the city. Since that time the average housing prices in Pine City have increased considerably. Chestnut City, which is about the same size as Pine City, has over the past twenty years experienced an increase in average housing prices similar to Pine City, but Chestnut City never established any laws that limit new building construction. So it is clear that laws limiting new construction have no effect on average housing prices. So if Maple City were to establish strict laws that limit new building construction, these laws will have no effect on average housing prices."

20年前,Pine City制定了严格的法律限制未来建筑的数量。从那以后,Pine City的平均房价便开始大幅上涨。Chestunt City,一个和Pine City几乎同等大小的城市,在过去20年里也经历了和Pine City类似的平均房价上涨的情况。但是Chestunt City从没制定过任何限制未来建筑数量的法律。很明显,立法限制新增房屋建筑的数量对平均房价上涨并没有抑制作用。因此如果Maple City也制定严格的法律限制未来建筑的数量,将不会对平均房价造成影响。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-20 00:57:18 |显示全部楼层
A special report on the art market
Suspended animation

Nov 26th 2009 From The Economist print edition
生词
读多遍才懂的句子
好句子,好表达法
====================================================

The art market has suffered from the recession, but globalisation should help it recover, say Fiammetta Rocco (interviewed here) and Sarah Thornton

Sothebys

THE longest bull run in a century of art-market history ended on a dramatic note with a sale of 56 works by Damien Hirst, “Beautiful Inside My Head Forever”, at Sotheby’s in London on September 15th 2008 (see picture). All but two pieces sold, fetching more than &pound;70m, a record for a sale by a single artist. It was a last hurrah. As the auctioneer called out bids, in New York one of the oldest banks on Wall Street, Lehman Brothers, filed for bankruptcy.

The world art market had already been losing momentum for a while after rising vertiginously since 2003. At its peak in 2007 it was worth some $65 billion, reckons Clare McAndrew, founder of Arts Economics, a research firm—double the figure five years earlier. Since then it may have come down to $50 billion. But the market generates interest far beyond its size because it brings together great wealth, enormous egos, greed, passion and controversy in a way matched by few other industries.

In the weeks and months that followed Mr Hirst’s sale, spending of any sort became deeply unfashionable, especially in New York, where the bail-out of the banks coincided with the loss of thousands of jobs and the financial demise of many art-buying investors. In the art world that meant collectors stayed away from galleries and salerooms. Sales of contemporary art fell by two-thirds, and in the most overheated sector—for Chinese contemporary art—they were down by nearly 90% in the year to November 2008. Within weeks the world’s two biggest auction houses, Sotheby’s and Christie’s, had to pay out nearly $200m in guarantees to clients who had placed works for sale with them.

The current downturn in the art market is the worst since the Japanese stopped buying Impressionists at the end of 1989, a move that started the most serious contraction in the market since the second world war. This time experts reckon that prices are about 40% down on their peak on average, though some have been far more volatile. But Edward Dolman, Christie’s chief executive, says: “I’m pretty confident we’re at the bottom.”

What makes this slump different from the last, he says, is that there are still buyers in the market, whereas in the early 1990s, when interest rates were high, there was no demand even though many collectors wanted to sell. Christie’s revenues in the first half of 2009 were still higher than in the first half of 2006. Almost everyone who was interviewed for this special report said that the biggest problem at the moment is not a lack of demand but a lack of good work to sell. The three Ds—death, debt and divorce—still deliver works of art to the market. But anyone who does not have to sell is keeping away, waiting for confidence to return.

The best that can be said about the market at the moment is that it is holding its breath. But this special report will argue that it will bounce back, and that the key to its recovery lies in globalisation. The supply of the best works of art will always be limited, but in the longer run demand is bound to rise as wealth is spreading ever more widely across the globe.

The World Wealth Report, published by Capgemini and Merrill Lynch, charts the spending habits of the rich the world over. It includes art as one of a range of luxury items they like to buy. According to the report, in 2007 there were over 10m people with investible assets of $1m or more. Last year that number dropped to 8.6m and many rich people scaled back their “investments of passion”—yachts, jets, cars, jewellery and so on. But the proportion of all luxury spending that went on art increased as investors looked for assets that would hold their value in the longer term.

The regional spread of buyers also changed significantly as some parts of the world became relatively richer. During the boom the number of wealthy people in Russia, India, China and the Middle East rose rapidly. In 2003 Sotheby’s biggest buyers—those who purchased lots costing at least $500,000—came from 36 countries. By 2007 they were spread over 58 countries and their total number had tripled.

That upward trend is still continuing, and many of the new buyers take a particular interest in the art of their own place and time. Last year China overtook France as the world’s third-biggest art market after America and Britain (see chart 1), and some 25% by value of the 100,000-plus works of art sold by Christie’s went to buyers from Russia, Asia and the Middle East.

Auction records remain dominated by Impressionist and modern works (see table 2), but the biggest expansion in recent years has been in contemporary art. Prices of older works keep going up as more people have money to spend, but few such works become available because both collectors and museums tend to hold on to what they have. Old Master paintings, for example, have stuck at around 5% of both Sotheby’s and Christie’s sales for many years. By contrast, contemporary art, which in the early 1990s accounted for less than 10% of Sotheby’s revenues, grew to nearly 30% of greatly increased revenues by last year. Dealers and auction houses now sell more post-war and contemporary art than anything else. This report will concentrate on that part of the market, which accounts for about half the world’s art trade and most of the excitement.

Part of the extra demand has come from a large increase in the number of museums. Over the past 25 years more than 100 have been built, not only in America and Europe but also in the sheikhdoms of the Persian Gulf and the fast-growing cities in Asia; sometimes in partnership with Western institutions, such as the Guggenheim or the Louvre, sometimes on their own. Many of these institutions have made their mark by buying contemporary art.

Over the same period the number of wealthy private collectors has also increased many times over, and so has their diversity. The record price for one of Andy Warhol’s giant faces of Chairman Mao was $17.4m, paid by Joseph Lau, a Hong Kong property developer. It was the first major Warhol to go to the Far East. A month later the Qatar royal family bought a Hirst pill cabinet, entitled “Lullaby Spring”, for &pound;9.7m, the first major Hirst bound for the Middle East. Everyone wants an iconic work, which helps explain the global demand for artists such as Warhol, Jeff Koons and Mr Hirst—and the eye-watering prices such work can command.

Masters of the art universe

Straddling all areas of the art market is a handful of individuals who have emerged as the key figures in the art world in recent years. Chief among them is Fran&ccedil;ois Pinault, a luxury-goods billionaire who is also a noted collector of contemporary art and the owner of Christie’s. Philippe Ségalot, his French-born adviser, was behind one of the biggest deals involving a single work of art, the private sale of Warhol’s 1963 painting, “Eight Elvises”, to an anonymous buyer for over $100m.

Mr Ségalot is also believed to be advising the royal family of Qatar, which in the past two years has spent large sums buying modern art at auction, including record-breaking works by Mark Rothko and Mr Hirst. Steven Cohen, an American hedge-fund billionaire, also owns works by Warhol, Mr Hirst and Mr Koons. Mr Cohen used to be a sizeable shareholder of Sotheby’s and is still an important provider of liquidity to art buyers.

The popularity of blockbuster art exhibitions and the emergence of buyers with a different cultural history have helped change tastes. Artists such as Edvard Munch and Vasily Kandinsky rose sharply after solo shows in London and New York. Alexei von Jawlensky and Emil Nolde were regarded as specialist interests until Russian collectors began seeking them out. Zhao Wuji used to be just another Chinese painter-in-exile; now he is recognised as an Abstract Expressionist master influenced by Paul Klee and praised by both Joan Miró and Pablo Picasso.

How to sell it

One of the biggest changes since the market last peaked in 1989 has been the expansion of the auction houses and the change in the nature of the dealer business. Twenty years ago auction houses sold to dealers, and dealers sold to private customers. Today many collectors are advised by auctioneers, both at sales and privately.

Rising costs brought trouble to many old-fashioned fine-art dealer emporiums. In London Christopher Gibbs has sold his stock and Partridge is in administration. In Paris Galerie Segoura has closed, as has Salvatore Romano in Florence. Many dealers now prefer to take art works on consignment, matching sellers to buyers for a commission rather than investing in stocks of art.

About half the market’s business, reckons Ms McAndrew of Arts Economics, is conducted at public auctions, with Christie’s and Sotheby’s taking the lion’s share. Smaller houses include Drouot in Paris, Bonhams, which is based in London but has several offices abroad, and Doyle in New York. The other half is generated by private dealers and galleries that are notoriously secretive. One of the biggest private deals in recent years came to light only because the details were disclosed in an American court following the Bernard Madoff scandal. Last July ten paintings by Rothko and two sculptures by Alberto Giacometti were sold by a New York financier to help repay Mr Madoff’s investors. A mystery buyer spent $310m on the works. Two dealers earned $37.5m in fees.

By comparison with that private world, Sotheby’s and Christie’s auction business looks like a model of transparency. Although buyers and sellers are rarely named, the auction price is public. Yet even here there are dark corners. The leading auctioneers offer inducements such as guaranteed prices to persuade sellers to part with their treasures, and generous terms of payment for buyers.

One thing that differentiates the two auction houses is their ownership structure. Sotheby’s is a quoted company whereas Christie’s, once listed, was taken private in 1999 by its current owner, Mr Pinault. Christie’s business has since expanded hugely, partly thanks to Mr Pinault’s pivotal position in the international art world. Even though the company can pick and choose what information it wants to reveal, it has in fact become more open over the past ten years.

Sotheby’s, for its part, is still smarting from the public beating it received in America nearly a decade ago when its chairman, Alfred Taubman, and its chief executive, Diana Brooks, were found guilty of conspiring with Christie’s to fix commissions. Mr Taubman served ten months of a one-year prison sentence; Mrs Brooks was given six months’ house arrest, a $350,000 fine and 1,000 hours of community service. No one was charged at Christie’s, which had blown the whistle on the commission-fixing. Sotheby’s lives in fear of the regulators and discloses only as much financial information as it has to.

In the decade since the scandal both auction houses have concentrated on expansion. Sotheby’s was the first auctioneer to become interested in Russia and remains bigger there than its rival. Christie’s, which has long been especially strong in the Far East, has put a lot of effort into China. Foreigners are not allowed to own auction houses there, but Christie’s has got around that by signing a licensing agreement with a leading Chinese auctioneer. Both houses have their eye on the Middle East. Christie’s holds regular auctions in Dubai, of which its art and jewellery sales are the most successful. Sotheby’s has opened an office in Qatar which is important for its relationship with the Qatar royal family, one of its biggest clients.

The response of both auction houses to the current slump has been broadly similar: staff cuts, unpaid leave, a squeeze on salaries, slashed marketing and travel budgets, and an edict that the glossy auction catalogues, which in the boom cost each of them &pound;25m a year to produce, were no longer to be handed out like chocolate drops.

With a hugely expanded international client base, it was only a matter of time before both auctioneers started to muscle in on areas that had previously been the preserve of private dealers, matching buyers and sellers and selling new art rather than items that had already been in the market. Sotheby’s proved to be much the more ruthless of the two. All the lots in Mr Hirst’s September 2008 sale, for example, had been consigned to Sotheby’s directly from the artist’s workshop, which shocked dealers who had not previously thought of the auction houses as direct competitors.

In 2006 Sotheby’s paid $56.5m for Noortman Master Paintings, a leading dealer in Old Masters. Less than a year later Christie’s bought Haunch of Venison, another high-profile dealer set up in 2002, whose founders included a former director of Christie’s contemporary-art department. Noortman gave Sotheby’s an entry into the Maastricht Art Fair, the pre-eminent dealers’ fest, and Haunch of Venison helped make Christie’s Mr Pinault the biggest art trader in the market. Both galleries operate independently of the auction houses, but the relationships are close.
All things to all men

Both auction houses have also put a lot of effort into advising buyers on how to improve their collections. As Jussi Pylkkanen, Christie’s European president, says, “We’re much more than an auction house now.” The recession has made many collectors nervous about offering their treasures at auction, so they are selling them privately. In 2007 Christie’s chalked up private sales of $542m and Sotheby’s of $730m, which means the two auction houses are now among the world’s biggest private dealers. Both often get calls like the one Sotheby’s recently took from a Moscow collector with $2m to spend on an “optimistic” Chagall oil, “not too feminine” and no more than a metre in height. “We put out the word and immediately received several offers from our offices in London, Geneva and New York,” says Mikhail Kamensky, the firm’s head of CIS business.

In 2007 private deals accounted for 8.7% of Christie’s business. Mr Pylkkanen expects that figure to go up to 20% of its revenue within three years. That should put the wind up private dealers.

------------------------------------------------------
fetch to bring in
hurrah EXCITEMENT  CHEER
momentum strength or force gained by motion or through the development of events  : IMPETUS  *the campaign gained momentum*
vertiginous  inclined to frequent and often pointless change  : INCONSTANT
ego  SELF-ESTEEM
demise DEATH
slump a marked or sustained decline especially in economic activity or prices
holding its breath NOT FOUND
lots a number of units (不太确定,求正解)
eye-watering NOT FOUND (惨不忍睹?)
Straddle to stand, sit, or walk with the legs wide apart (这里应该是涉及多个领域的“涉及”的意思)
blockbuster  one that is notably expensive, effective, successful, large, or extravagant
lion’s share 巨大的市场占有额
notoriously generally known and talked of / widely and unfavorably known
transparency something transparent;  especially   : a picture (as on film) viewed by light shining through it or by projection
squeeze  to deprive by extortion
chalk up  ATTAIN, ACHIEVE  *chalk up a record score for the season* (还有ASCRIBE, CREDIT 的意思)
--------------------------------------------------
comments
It took me such a long time to finish this article. Its vocabulary is not that difficult while the sentence structure is pretty much the reason that bothers my understanding. I sometimes come across such situations that no a word is a new one for me but I still have not idea about the whole sentence. I’m wondering if it is my weak grammar foundation that leads to this embarrassing situation. Hope this everyday-reading process may help me improve. Anyway, although I am not familiar with issues on financial market, this article provides me a promising image that the global economy is turning warmer. This is a good news for every one.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
93
注册时间
2006-1-23
精华
0
帖子
1
发表于 2009-12-20 01:01:49 |显示全部楼层
亲爱的奋斗到大晚上~~真是个勤奋的好孩子
八面玲珑的K小姐❀

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-20 10:46:39 |显示全部楼层
亲爱的奋斗到大晚上~~真是个勤奋的好孩子
sharktwin 发表于 2009-12-20 01:01


勤奋的话就要白天就做完~~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
8
寄托币
783
注册时间
2008-7-8
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-12-21 09:48:27 |显示全部楼层
A special report on China and America
A wary respect
Oct 22nd 2009 From The Economist print edition
生词
读多遍才懂的句子
好句子,好表达法
========================================================================

America and China need each other, but they are a long way from trusting each other, says James Miles.

OUR future history will be more determined by our position on the Pacific facing China than by our position on the Atlantic facing Europe,” said the American president as he contemplated the extraordinary commercial opportunities that were opening up in Asia. More than a hundred years after Theodore Roosevelt made this prediction, American leaders are again looking across the Pacific to determine their own country’s future, and that of the rest of the world. Rather later than Roosevelt expected, China has become an inescapable part of it.

Back in 1905, America was the rising power. Britain, then ruler of the waves, was worrying about losing its supremacy to the upstart. Now it is America that looks uneasily on the rise of a potential challenger. A shared cultural and political heritage helped America to eclipse British power without bloodshed, but the rise of Germany and Japan precipitated global wars. President Barack Obama faces a China that is growing richer and stronger while remaining tenaciously authoritarian. Its rise will be far more nettlesome than that of his own country a century ago.

With America’s economy in tatters and China’s still growing fast (albeit not as fast as before last year’s financial crisis), many politicians and intellectuals in both China and America feel that the balance of power is shifting more rapidly in China’s favour. Few expect the turning point to be as imminent as it was for America in 1905. But recent talk of a “G2” hints at a remarkable shift in the two countries’ relative strengths: they are now seen as near-equals whose co-operation is vital to solving the world’s problems, from finance to climate change and nuclear proliferation.

Choose your weapons

Next month Mr Obama will make his first ever visit to China. He and his Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao (pictured above) stress the need for co-operation and avoid playing up their simmering trade disputes, fearful of what failure to co-operate could mean. On October 1st China offered a stunning display of the hard edge of its rising power as it paraded its fast-growing military arsenal through Beijing.

The financial crisis has sharpened fears of what Americans often see as another potential threat. China has become the world’s biggest lender to America through its purchase of American Treasury securities, which in theory would allow it to wreck the American economy. These fears ignore the value-destroying (and, for China’s leaders, politically hugely embarrassing) effect that a sell-off of American debt would have on China’s dollar reserves. This special report will explain why China will continue to lend to America, and why the yuan is unlikely to become a reserve currency soon.

When Lawrence Summers was president of Harvard University (he is now Mr Obama’s chief economic adviser), he once referred to a “balance of financial terror” between America and its foreign creditors, principally China and Japan. That was in 2004, when Japan’s holdings were more than four times the size of China’s. By September 2008 China had taken the lead. China Daily, an official English-language newspaper, said in July that China’s massive holdings of US Treasuries meant it could break the dollar’s reserve-currency status any time. But it also noted that in effect this was a “foreign-exchange version of the cold-war stalemate based on ‘mutually assured destruction’”.

China is exploring the rubble of the global economy in hopes of accelerating its own rise. Some Chinese commentators point to the example of the Soviet Union, which exploited Western economic disarray during the Depression to acquire industrial technology from desperate Western sellers. China has long chafed at controls imposed by America on high-technology exports that could be used for military purposes. It sees America’s plight as a cue to push for the lifting of such barriers and for Chinese companies to look actively for buying opportunities among America’s high-technology industries.

The economic crisis briefly slowed the rapid growth, from a small base, of China’s outbound direct investment. Stephen Green of Standard Chartered predicts that this year it could reach about the same level as in 2008 (nearly $56 billion, which was more than twice as much as the year before). Some Americans worry about China’s FDI, just as they once mistakenly did about Japan’s buying sprees, but many will welcome the stability and employment that it provides.

China may have growing financial muscle, but it still lags far behind as a technological innovator and creator of global brands. This special report will argue that the United States may have to get used to a bigger Chinese presence on its own soil, including some of its most hallowed turf, such as the car industry. A Chinese man may even get to the moon before another American. But talk of a G2 is highly misleading. By any measure, China’s power is still dwarfed by America’s.

Authoritarian though China remains, the two countries’ economic philosophies are much closer than they used to be. As Yan Xuetong of Tsinghua University puts it, socialism with Chinese characteristics (as the Chinese call their brand of communism) is looking increasingly like capitalism with American characteristics. In Mr Yan’s view, China’s and America’s common interest in dealing with the financial crisis will draw them closer together strategically too. Global economic integration, he argues with a hint of resentment, has made China “more willing than before to accept America’s dominance”.

The China that many American business and political leaders see is one that appears to support the status quo and is keen to engage peacefully with the outside world. But there is another side to the country. Nationalism is a powerful, growing and potentially disruptive force. Many Chinese—even among those who were educated in America—are suspicious of American intentions and resentful of American power. They are easily persuaded that the West, led by the United States, wants to block China’s rise.

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the restoration of diplomatic ties between America and China, which proved a dramatic turning point in the cold war. Between the communist victory in 1949 and President Richard Nixon’s historic visit to China in 1972 there had been as little contact between the two countries as there is between America and North Korea today. But the eventual disappearance of the two countries’ common enemy, the Soviet Union, raised new questions in both countries about why these two ideological rivals should be friends. Mutual economic benefit emerged as a winning answer. More recently, both sides have been trying to reinforce the relationship by stressing that they have a host of new common enemies, from global epidemics to terrorism.

But it is a relationship fraught with contradictions. A senior American official says that some of his country’s dealings with China are like those with the European Union; others resemble those with the old Soviet Union, “depending on what part of the bureaucracy you are dealing with”.

Cold-war parallels are most obvious in the military arena. China’s military build-up in the past decade has been as spectacular as its economic growth, catalysed by the ever problematic issue of Taiwan, the biggest thorn in the Sino-American relationship. There are growing worries in Washington, DC, that China’s military power could challenge America’s wider military dominance in the region. China insists there is nothing to worry about. But even if its leadership has no plans to displace American power in Asia, this special report will say that America is right to fret that this could change.

Politically, China is heading for a particularly unsettled period as preparations gather pace for sweeping leadership changes in 2012 and 2013. Mr Hu and the prime minister, Wen Jiabao, will be among many senior politicians due to retire. As America moves towards its own presidential elections in 2012, its domestic politics will complicate matters. Taiwan too will hold presidential polls in 2012 in which China-sceptic politicians will fight to regain power.

Triple hazard

This political uncertainty in all three countries simultaneously will be a big challenge for the relationship between China and America. All three will still be grappling with the aftermath of the global financial crisis. Urban Chinese may be feeling relaxed right now, but there could be trouble ahead. Yu Yongding, a former adviser to China’s central bank, says wasteful spending on things like unnecessary infrastructure projects (which is not uncommon in China) could eventually drain the country’s fiscal strength and leave it with “no more drivers for growth”. In recent weeks even Chinese leaders have begun to sound the occasional note of caution about the stability of China’s recovery.

This special report will argue that the next few years could be troubled ones for the bilateral relationship. China, far more than an economically challenged America, is roiled by social tensions. Protests are on the rise, corruption is rampant, crime is surging. The leadership is fearful of its own citizens. Mr Obama is dealing with a China that is at risk of overestimating its strength relative to America’s. Its frailties—social, political and economic—could eventually imperil both its own stability and its dealings with the outside world.

==============================================================
tenacious persistent in maintaining, adhering to, or seeking something valued or desired  *a tenacious advocate of civil rights*  
nettlesome IRRITATING
intellectual  an intellectual person
play up  EMPHASIZE;  also   : EXAGGERATE,
fearful  causing or likely to cause fear, fright, or alarm especially because of dangerous quality  
hard edge the hard edge of its rising power" means the strongest, toughest, most to be feared part of its rising power.its alludes to a sword:might, strength, cutting
Treasury a governmental department in charge of finances and especially the collection, management, and expenditure of public revenues

reserve currency a currency which is held in significant quantities by many governments and institutions as part of their foreign exchange reserves. It also tends to be the international pricing currency for products traded on a global market, such as oil gold. reserve 指储备金
rubble broken fragments (as of rock) resulting from the decay or destruction of a building
exploit to make productive use of
plight an unfortunate, difficult, or precarious situation
outbound outward bound 对外的
spree an unrestrained indulgence in or outburst of an activity
hallowed turf to respect greatly,the upper stratum of soil bound by grass and plant roots into a thick mat 这里连起来用指神圣的领地
capitalism an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market 即 资本主义
disruptive to break apart  : RUPTURE 破裂的
intentions what one intends to do or bring about 意象 意图
resentful   full of resentment  : inclined to resent 充满愤恨的
epidemics  an outbreak or product of sudden rapid spread, growth, or development  *an epidemic of bankruptcies*
parallels something equal or similar in all essential particulars  
thorn a woody plant bearing sharp impeding processes (as prickles or spines)
fret to cause to suffer emotional strain
bilateral affecting reciprocally two nations or parties  *a bilateral treaty*  
roiled to make turbid by stirring up the sediment or dregs of

========================================================================
comments

What the article conveys is an American perspective on Sino-American relationship. Being witnessed by the globe, Chinese rapid growth in economy and military force is now under the spotlight. Western countries, principally the US, are becoming more and more worried on their biggest potential counterpart in Asia. Though the Chinese government has accentuated several times that it can be more willing to accept American’s domination than recent days, the US is still in worried and block china’s progress in many ways, technology exchange, marketing share and etc. However, at the end of this article, it somehow prove to American citizens that China is and will be dwarfed under the US that it is not necessary to worry that much. Personally, I agree with this point, because what ranks China on the top three (and will become the second over Japan soon) is its country’s GDP while when this figure is divided by its population, it’s no more than $3500 which less than one-tenth of America’s. Taking this point of view, we, as the new generation of china, have to take a more suffer burden to compete with the globe.

使用道具 举报

RE: 1006G[REBORN FROM THE ASHES组]备考日记 by 豆腐店的86——越来越快(新) [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
1006G[REBORN FROM THE ASHES组]备考日记 by 豆腐店的86——越来越快(新)
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1038659-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部