- 最后登录
- 2015-11-28
- 在线时间
- 446 小时
- 寄托币
- 1342
- 声望
- 75
- 注册时间
- 2008-12-18
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 15
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1209
- UID
- 2583671
 
- 声望
- 75
- 寄托币
- 1342
- 注册时间
- 2008-12-18
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 15
|
[01.03][REBORN FROM THE ASHES][comment]
Words and expressions:
one might meet hypocrites who used righteousness as a fig leaf for their cupidity (1 : inordinate desire for wealth : AVARICE, GREED; 2 : strong desire : LUST)
nosedive:1 : a downward nose-first plunge of a flying object (as an airplane)
2 : a sudden extreme drop *stock prices took a nosedive* (很形象的一个词)
they all joined in the scramble for gains.
a new interpretation of righteousness and gain looms large
It is in fact of little help if you try to redeem the world or salvage the corrupt minds through preaching various brands of righteousness.
Both righteousness and gain are yoked by calculating minds.
The difference between creating and possessing is more than crystal clear.
when most people are busy hunting for wealth and being hunted by it,
enshrine:to preserve or cherish as sacred
Shaw’s standpoint is no other than "possessing", which keeps us stranded (搁浅) in a double dosage tragedy (双重的悲剧) of life:
premium :a reward or recompense for a particular act
this belief will help me sail through the unpredictable waters of my future life.
Commet:
Although the article expresses some really profound and significant idea, it is quite easy to understand. Maybe it is written by a Chinese, and though in English, the writer and readers are all thinking in the same mode. And back to the content of the article, I think the author tells us a very important viewpoint on what is the most appropriate attitude toward life in a current corruptive world.
First of all, I sides with the author's understanding and explanation of the famous sayings by Confucius. I think when the society begins to set examples to its people with righteous man or deeds, it is just the time when the society begin to corrupt. For instance, back to the Confucius time, the country Lu had a regulation that when merchants were doing business in other countries and saw the people of Lu became slaves, the could buy them, brought them back to Lu, and set them free. Later they could go to the government for money the spent on saving such people. Then once one of Confucius's students, Zilu, a famous merchant, saved a man of Lu from other country, but he did not go to the government for money. When Confucius knew this, he praised Zilu as a righteous man who cared little about gain. So gradually, this "great deed" of Zilu was widely spread, and the government of Lu set Zilu as an example. However, from then on, the people saved from other countries became fewer and fewer. The reason was that not all merchants were rich enough to save the slaveries of Lu for free. However, if they continued to saved them and then went back to the government for money, other people would think that they were not righteous. So most of the merchants would just pretend that they did not notice the suffered people of Lu in other countries. This is how a righteous action actually starts the corrupt of the society.
So as the author says, neither the pursuit of righteousness nor gain is a recommendable and beneficial way of life. The author advocates an aesthetic approach toward life, that is "disposition". And everyone should keep his true self. I cannot agree with the idea more. But here goes my question, how can we find true self? And for those who have already find their true self, how can they protect it from being corrupted buy this material worlds? Here is an example of my respected high school teacher. He once told us that his motivation of life came from the achievement of his students. Seeing the growth of his students under his guidance gave him the feeling of accomplishment, which brought him the purest and simplest happiness in the world. So he insisted standing on the rostrum while his collogue worked and calculated for promotion, quitted teaching to do business for money, and so on. He was not a man engaging in giving, like the former type. He obviously lived according to his true self and led a graceful life before his wife was diagnosed with cancer and his son caught in an serious accident, requiring huge amount of money, which he certainly could not afford. And then his faith started to falter. Maybe this example is a little bit extreme. All I want to say is that since living in a corrupt world, you cannot simply perfect yourself.
The author gives us a clear example of writing to illustrate the difference between creating and possessing. Yet the author puts a quite vague description on giving and creation:"Different from giving, which is the performance of an external responsibility, creating is the realization of one’s true self." And like the author concludes, it is a non-material attitudes toward life. From what I understand, this non-material attitude is kind of giving.
Well, even though some of us may still do not know what we should do and believe, at least we now know what we should not follow, thanks to this wise article.
|
|