- 最后登录
- 2021-2-22
- 在线时间
- 4673 小时
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 声望
- 762
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 907
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 6161
- UID
- 2565872
- 声望
- 762
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 907
|
本帖最后由 mpromanus 于 2010-1-2 23:34 编辑
Undoubtedly, telephonesserve as a means to communicate with whomever one likes to talk to, aslong as he remembers the other’s phone numbers. However, the advent oftelevisions ('Television' as 'the mass communication medium' is not countable. 'Televisions' is actually a short form of 'television sets'. This is similar to the difference between 电视 and 电视机, while interestingly 电视 could also mean both.)as a visible and audible medium in the modern society, haschanged the way people speaking, acting and liveing, thus impacting themass far more than the one of phones do (I think your intended comparison is between 'the advent of TV' vs. 'the advent of telephones', that's why you used 'the one of..'. But since 'the advent' is so far away, your reader would likely associate your comparison with the nearest reasonable entity - in this case the verb 'impact', and that's why I've changed the phrase to 'do'. Take note that this is not saying you're wrong. It's just difficult to understand what's being compared when the target is too far away. Humans by nature can only hold about 6-8 words in their memory cache at one time, so in order to make you expressions clear, you'll need to keep ideas close to each other if you intend them to be associated. The same principle goes with using pronouns and making comparisons.).
Initially (This word means 'in the beginning' rather than 'first', signalling a sequence in time or space, rather than a sequence in the order of things. I'd suggest a more generic 'to begin with'), provided with vivid pictures and authentic sounds, theinformation of (I'd suggest 'from'.) news and shows on TV has never been so trustworthy andattractive than today. Television news are forever telling audiencesthe true stories with memorable sights or even witness descriptions,usually about the scene (What scene?), compared with the tiredness and boredom ofreading printed words printed and the doubt of unreliable but advanced Internetnews (I'm not sure what you're trying to express here, because this basically reads 'the doubt of..Internet news', something I can't quite guess at.). In addition, a variety of well-edited entertainment shows, fullof superstars, animals, and unbelievable magic, never fail to arouselaughter and interests among viewers. (Yeah, but you're expected to compare this with TELEPHONES, not printed media or the Internet.)
Moreover, when families and friends are accustomed to commenting on lastnights' shows, televisions definitely penetrates into the daily life andchange the lifestyle. It is the family-together TV time that drivespeople to fasten their pace to home, to gulp up the dinner and to rush tofinish the rest (Normally you don't put two to + v. phrases right next to each other as it's very hard to read. And why must it be 'the rest'? Is there any particular issue you wish to stress on about 'the rest' of homework and housework? If not, this sentence would read cleaner if you take 'the rest' out. If you insist on keeping it, I'd suggest '..and to rush to the finish of remaining homeword and housework'. ) of the homework and housework. It is also nothing butthe television topics that attract strangers into exchanging their opinionsand arguing heatedly much like old friends. Again, it is the televisionsthat guide the outsiders (Judging from what you've written after this word, I'd suggest 'amateurs'. 'Oursiders' are people who are not 'inside'. They can be people who are not members of a group/organization, but more often are people who don't know the 'secrets' of the group/organization.) to buy a professional washing machine and cooka delicious dinner. (Again, you're not comparing this influence of TV with that of telephones. Without a comparison and a proper conclusion, you're creating an open-ended argument - one that anybody is free to refute. For example, one can easily argue that phones change people's lifestyle as much as TV does - e.g. the hurry home to tend to phone messages; the necessity of waiting for calls; the birth of telemarketing; the birth of an entire set of social etiquette on the topic of making effective, polite phone calls - it doesn't even need to be GOOD influence. Your writing therefore amounts to NOTHING.)
What is equally crucial for the point is that the changing culture isincreasingly marked by the brand, TV. As the term "television culture"is not newly invented, only those bookworms do not understand whatAmerican Idol is. (What does American Idol has to do with the invention of 'television culture'? Why must people know about American Idol because 'television culture' is not a new term? You're making a very absurd connection. It's as if saying people must all know about the different shapes of Italian pasta by now because noodle was invented some 4000 years ago!) With the phenomenon that, the more excellent TV showsare, the more ads inserted,
the slogans of the TV ads influence theconsumers more than on their purchasing habits. Once a melodic advertisementsong comes out, it is the only song that everybody involuntarilyremembers and sings. Oddly enough, the more disgusting? they are, the morequickly audiences learn the song by heart and remember the brand. (Do you have any solid example on this? Also, you're expected to compare TV with telephones. Without doing the due, you're basically not fulfilling your task.)
Conclusively (This more often means 'definitely' rather than 'in a manner of making a conclusion'.), while telephones only convey ones' voices quickly, TVstransmit the information, ideas and concepts in a visible and audibleway, even unconsciously, possessing a dramatic influence on the public,as well as the culture.
总结:
语法 - 没有很大的问题,偶尔会犯错误。需要注意的一个是介词,一个是定冠词the该用才用,不要什么地方都扔。。
词汇 - 很好,但是有些词用得不是很准确。
逻辑 - 嗯。议论文的议和论两个事情中,只能说你论得很好,但是议得不够,也就是中间大段光分析阐述,没意见没结论。。似乎你不是很明白这种作文应该怎么写,基本上说和八股文类似。。开头破题+立主论点,中间议论是每一段提出一个分论点,进行具体论述,然后指出分论点如何推得主论点,最后一段结尾简单总述主要分论点再次确认主论点结束。。说白了就是要紧密围绕在以题目和主论点为中心的中央周围。。你这篇的写法是立论电视比电话影响大之后就开始写电视影响多么多么大最后结论说电视比电话影响大,要证明A>B结果你证明了一通A有多么大而已,道理就像要是你光说自己有好多好多好多好多钱,不能证明你一定比你邻居有钱;你得说你有这么这么多数字的钱,你邻居有那么那么多数字的钱,大家一比才能证明你比你邻居有钱一样。。 |
|