LSAT阅读让我们见识ARGUMENT开头段的写法

lghscuUID: 2552043

Amsden has divided Navajo weaving into four distinct styles. He argues that three of them can be identified by the type of design used to form horizontal bands: colored strips, zigzags, or diamonds. The fourth, or bordered, style he identifies by a distinct border surrounding centrally placed, dominating figures.
Amsden believes that the diamond style appeared after 1869 when, under Anglo influence and encouragement, the blanket became a rug with larger designs and bolder lines. The bordered style appeared about 1890, and, Amsden argues, it reflects the greatest number of Anglo influences on the newly emerging rug business. The Anglo desire that anything with a graphic designs have a top, bottom, and border is a cultural preference that the Navajo abhorred, as evidenced, he suggests, by the fact that in early bordered specimens strips of color unexpectedly break through the enclosing pattern.
Amsden argues that the bordered rug represents a radical break with previous styles. He asserts that the border changed the artistic problem facing weavers: a blank area suggests the use of isolated figures, while traditional, banded Navajo designs were continuous and did not use isolated figures. The old patterns alternated horizontal decorative zones in a regular order.
Amsden’s view raises several questions. First, what is involved in altering artistic styles? Some studies suggest that artisans’ motor habits and thought processes must be revised when a style changes precipitously. In the evolution of Navajo weaving, however, no radical revisions in the way articles are produced need be assumed. After all, all weaving subordinates design to the physical limitations created by the process of weaving, which includes creating an edge or border. The habits required to make decorative borders are, therefore, latent and easily brought to the surface.
Second, is the relationship between the banded and bordered styles as simple as Amsden suggests? He assumes that a break in style is a break in psychology. But if style results from constant quests for invention, such stylistic breaks are inevitable. When a style has exhausted the possibilities inherent in its principles, artists cast about (v. 搜索, 想方设法) for new, but not necessarily alien, principles. Navajo weaving may have reached this turning point prior to 1890.
Third, is there really a significant stylistic gap? Two other styles lie between the banded styles and the bordered styles. They suggest that disintegration of the bands may have altered visual and motor habits and prepared the way for a border filled with separate units. In the Chief White Antelope blanket, dated prior to 1865, ten years before the first Anglo trading post on the Navajo reservation, whole and partial diamonds interrupt the flowing design and become separate forms. Parts of diamonds arranged vertically at each side may be seen to anticipate the border.

lghscuUID: 2552043

开头段如何构写一直饱受争议
从这篇ARUGMENT型LSAT阅读可以看出
做出全文铺垫，并在一定程序统领全文
就是一个好的开头

漏雨的房子UID: 2300802

现说四个。分说前三个。。。再分说最后一个。。。

楼主说的是这个写法？还是。。？

lghscuUID: 2552043

楼主说的是这个写法？还是。。？
漏雨的房子 发表于 2010-1-11 00:06

不是，是“需要”而为之
而不是为了开头而开头
为了作文章而刻意分成N段来写

以内在逻辑统领全文
以文章表意核心为逻辑链

adammaksimUID: 2675466

mark下 ~~

gongyuxiang1990UID: 2697832

恩，开头体现逻辑链是很多前辈提过的写法，666版主就有一篇专门说Argument.我想跟楼主探讨的是，穿插逻辑链和restate如何有效区分，有时候逻辑链分析出来了，写在文章里却又觉得像在Restate.请LZ指教。

漏雨的房子UID: 2300802

一般用什么样的逻辑链？

NaperyUID: 2710990

楼主或许可以对这个文章 好好的批注一下
发表一下详细的高见 这样我们看的也会更明白吧 呵呵

NaperyUID: 2710990

虽然这个是LSAT阅读的开头
但并不能说明 我们写ARGUE按照这个来写就一定合适
文章是死的 人是活的 无论是批改的人 还是写作文的人
不管这个开头是不是真的很合适
假设很合适 然后如果大家都跟风来模仿
到了后来不也是和模板一样

所以我觉得楼主还是好好的像我们推荐一下这个开头
领着我们真正的了解这个开头的意义

呵呵 不知道我说的对不对