寄托天下
查看: 1659|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] Argument 137 麻烦大家拍下我的论证,是不是他因不够多,非常感谢~~~ [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
80
注册时间
2008-5-13
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-15 13:14:54 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TOPIC: ARGUMENT137 - The following appearedin an editorial in the Mason City newspaper.

"At present, Mason City residentsseldom use the nearby Mason River for any kind of recreational activity, eventhough surveys of the region's residents consistently rank water sports(swimming, fishing, and boating) as a favorite form of recreation. Since therehave been complaints about the quality of the water in the river, residentsmust be avoiding the river because they think that it is not clean enough. Butthat situation is about to change: the agency responsible for rivers in ourregion has announced plans to clean up Mason River. Therefore, recreational useof the river is likely to increase, so the Mason City council will need toincrease its budget for improvements to the publicly owned lands along theMason River."
WORDS: 533
TIME: 00:42:07
DATE: 2010-1-15 下午 12:03:04

The author indicates that because theinfluenced Mason River will be cleaned by the agency, the residents will useMason River for water entertainment and the Mason City council need to increasethe budget for improvements to the lands along the river. It seems to belogical. However, there are some unreliable points in this argument so that Icannot accept the conclusion. Arbitrarily taking this advice may not meet theneed of the residents, or make the council falsely invest the budget.

First of all, we do not know how manyresidents these surveys and complaints represented. Since the author do notgive the background of the surveys and complaints, we should remain suspiciousof authenticity that whether people love water sports and whether the river isnot clean enough. First, the region's residents may cover a little part of thewhole population of the city and the number of complaints may just be one ortwo. Moreover, the author does not point out when the surveys were conducted.Perhaps residents do not like water sports now. All the possibilities mentionedabove make the argument be not able to convince me about the condition of theriver.

Secondly, the author builds a problematiccausal relationship between the low quality of the water in the river and thelow rate of usage of the river by the residents. No evidence demonstrates thatthe residents are not willing to use the river for entertainment because thewater in it is not so clean. Even if the result about water sports of surveys representsmost residents' voice, they may totally not come up with the thought that usethe Mason River to swim, fish or boat. It is entirely possible that the riveris too narrow and shallow to conduct these water sports. The author hastilyconcludes that residents must be avoiding the river because they think that itis not clean enough. Without illustrating why residents seldom use the river, Icannot accept the river will be popular if it is cleaned up.

Last but not least, even though it is thequality of the water in the river that refuses the residents to use the river, itis unwarranted for the city council to increase the budget for improvements tothe publicly owned lands along the river. That people become willing to use theriver for recreation does not mean they will surely use or care the publiclands along the river. Since the author do not make out the situation of thepublic land, it is completely possible that the residents are satisfied withits appearance at present. If it is the case, the increasing of budget is justa waste of money. Therefore, we are not persuaded with the author's advice thatthe budget should be increased.

To sum up, since the author do not lay outclear and direct evidence that can prove whether the surveys and complaintsrepresent the public, whether the quality of the water make residents avoid touse the river and whether the budgets for improvement to the lands along theriver, we should carefully evaluate the advices and not be too optimistic aboutit.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
80
注册时间
2008-5-13
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2010-1-15 23:43:16 |只看该作者
我的文章总是没人评呢。。伤心。。。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11

声望
5467
寄托币
14529
注册时间
2005-10-2
精华
13
帖子
2484

寄托21周年 荣誉版主 Golden Apple 版务能手 寄托兑换店纪念章 EU Advisor AW小组活动奖 GRE守护之星 Cancer巨蟹座 德意志之心 AW作文修改奖 AW活动特殊奖 GRE斩浪之魂 GRE梦想之帆 23周年庆勋章

板凳
发表于 2010-1-16 00:16:43 |只看该作者
请记住,在你没有给予他人帮助之前,没有人有义务帮你修改作文。
因此在发贴求拍的同时,首先要有帮别人改的行动。
1. 在自己发贴求拍以后帮别人改上一篇,然后在拍的最后贴上自己的文章链接希望别人能够回拍是个很不错的办法。
2. 加入作文互改小组这种方式。
3. 参与零散板油互改。https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1048719-1-2.html
4. 找正在运营的修改铺。
心大了,事情就小了。

如果受了伤就喊一声痛,
真的说出来就不会太难过。
不去想自由,
反而更轻松,
愿意感动孤独单不忐忑。
生活啊生活啊,
会快乐也会寂寞,
生活啊生活啊,
明天我们好好的过。

爱生活,爱寄托。
一直在这里。我爱你们。

使用道具 举报

RE: Argument 137 麻烦大家拍下我的论证,是不是他因不够多,非常感谢~~~ [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Argument 137 麻烦大家拍下我的论证,是不是他因不够多,非常感谢~~~
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1051499-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部