issue79 球拍 以及其他懇求

TEFouDAFUID: 2759255

2.22考试 今天才开始限时作文 鉴于实战的时候很有可能抽不到高频 故以随机派送题目的方式模考 而将高频准备挪于提纲准备 另外为了留给自己足够的时间（重要原因是自己效率不高 折减率需要考虑其中）没有上任何培训班【是不是很舍本逐末？】
首次模考的字数结果（issue 553 argument 400）以及刚刚卡点的状况 说明自己打字的速度和准度都不是太高（正因为如此issue酌情只展开了两段）
请各位高人在猛拍本人劣作的同时是否能结合上述境况给我指明一条道路 以免AW一致收敛到杯具
感激不尽

TOPIC: ISSUE79 - "Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts, who are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public."

WORDS: 553
TIME: 0:45:00
DATE:

Nowadays, we are in face of many pressing social problems, such as win-win in international competition and fair allocation of wealth, which call for making policies. As to address such issues, many think that it is the duty of the politicians and other government experts who are proficient in judging and tackling those problems. While others think that the general public also has the right to engage in the policy-making. As far as I am concerned, it is more effective and efficient to leave the main issues to the politicians and government experts while providing an access for the general public to express their idea and implement their thoughts.

In my opinion, it is an effective and efficient way to address the pressing social issues by leaving them to the politician and government experts. Enthusiastic in and responsible for such problems, they will not sit aside to let these problems go without control. On the basis of the tactic, knowledge and experience they accumulated during their process of learning and along with careers, they will be apt to view these issues in a more balanced perspective, therefore provide more potent approaches to solving these problem. Consider how we general public think of boycott. When a certain country has done something that impedes the interest of our own or violates the integrity of our nation, we general public are prone to boycott any product of that country, without thinking it over. So insanely have we done that we just keep boycotting for just a few days when the miasma has dispersed and the overly patriotism has been forgotten by us. However, informed politicians and government experts will not do it in a simple way. Instead, they will take every possibility into consideration and strike all the competing interests into balance. Thus, on one hand, they acclaim the protection and maintain the reputation of our country; on the other hand, their deeds will rarely render a bad impetus on economic and politic between the two countries in the long run, laying the foundation of a win-win end.

However, major policy decisions should not always be left to them. Because in a democratic society, it is a threshold matter to put the interests and rights of the general public first, by providing them an access to participating in politic or other fields alike. Limited by their status or certain environment, politicians and government expert are not always in tight contact with the general publics, not to mention getting a clear view of the requirement of the general publics. While by giving the general public an opportunity to formulate their need and necessities and embolden them to draw a blueprint they long for on their own, the politicians and the general experts will know what is behind the prosperity and may get rid of the would-be crises. In sum, encouraging the general public to take part in politic will serve as complement to the regular procedure of policy-making.

To conclude, much credence may be laid on the politicians and government expert that they will make better judgment and cope with the situation more effectively and efficiently. Nonetheless, the possibilities for the general public to engage in policy-making should not be ignored. In such way, we can come to a fair and open policy that is aimed at the promotion of the society.

https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1057402&page=1#pid1773606438

TEFouDAFUID: 2759255

另外 不能不提的是 自从大二以来 我就告别英语了 转而投怀送抱于法语
现在重拾英语 不知是否合宜
（请各大人将这个条件也考虑进去 谢谢指点）

TEFouDAFUID: 2759255

不知道在这个论坛上像我这样平庸之辈是不是就不会被眷顾

我没有其他的奢望 只是希望各位达仁能够稍稍指点一下 以收醍醐灌顶之效
毕竟初值不同 最终收敛的结果会有可能不同 虽然仍会处在悲剧的区间内

TEFouDAFUID: 2759255

為什麼仍舊這麼悲摧呢

rodgoodUID: 2619326

回拍~~~

LZ的语言还是不错的哈，同义词建议多积累点点，以供变化哈。

TEFouDAFUID: 2759255

謝謝 暫修改如下

Nowadays, we are in face of many pressing social problems, such as win-win strategy in international
cooperation and competition, or the livelihood of people, which call for drafting policies properly. As
to address such issues, I agree insofar as it is the duty of the politicians and other government experts
who are proficient in judging and tackling those major problems. While it is more effective and
efficient to provide an access for the general public to express their idea and implement their thoughts
and render them the right to engage in the policy-making.

Admittedly, it is an effective and efficient way to address the pressing social issues by leaving them to
the politician and government experts. Enthusiastic in and responsible for such problems, they will
not sit aside to let these problems go unbridled. On the basis of the tactic, knowledge and experience
accumulated during the process of learning and careers as well, they will be apt to view these issues in
a more balanced perspective, therefore come up with more potent approaches to solving these
problem. Consider, when a certain country has done something that harms the interest of our own or
violates the integrity of our nation, informed politicians and government experts will take a prudent
action by taking every possibility into consideration and striking all the competing interests into
balance. on one hand, they acclaim the protest and maintain the reputation of our country; on the other
hand, their deeds will rarely render a bad impetus on economic and politic between the two countries
in the long run, thus resulting in a win-win solution.

On the contrary, confronted with such situation, we general public resort to boycott. Impelled by the
raw patriotism, we are prone to refuse any product of that country, without thinking it over. So
insanely have we undertaken the boycott that we just hold on for just a few days until the miasma
disperse and the undue fanaticism wane. However, the situation is exacerbated rather than alleviated.
Although the enthusiasm is blameless indeed, the lack of enough prudence which is the serious
demerit of the general public may undermine the feasibility of the policy to some extent.

However, major policy decisions should not always be left to the politicians and government experts.
Limited by their status or certain environment, politicians and government expert are not always in
tight contact with the general publics, not to mention getting a clear view of the requirement of the
general publics. Furthermore, it is a threshold matter to give the priority to the interests and rights of
the general public first in a democratic society. By providing the general public with an opportunity to
formulate their needs and necessities and draw a blue print of the policy they long for, the politicians
and the general experts will know what is behind the prosperity and may get rid of the would-be crises.
In sum, encouraging the general public to take part in politic will serve as complement to the regular
procedure of policy-making, which in turn prompts the effectiveness and efficiency of policy-making.

To conclude, much credence should be laid on the politicians and government expert that they will
make better judgment and deal with the situation more effectively and efficiently. Nonetheless, the
possibilities for the general public to engage in policy-making should not be ignored. In such way, we
can come to a just and open policy that is aimed at the promotion of the society.