argument51 【clover】第四次小组作业 by 桔子susan

桔子susanUID: 2754084

51.The following appeared in a medical newsletter.

"Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some
patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis
has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of
patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle
injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took
antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time
was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in
the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician,
were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking
antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly
reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain
would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment."






Based on preliminary results of a study, it has been proved that secondary infections may keep some patients from quikly after severe muscle strain. As a result, the arguer concluded that all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treament. However, several logical flaws may seriously undermine this argument.

First of all, the patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain may not suffer from severe muscle strain and secondary infections. It could just be light muscle strain. In this case, the precondition of this conclusion is failed. And no evidence has showed that people who suffer from severe muscle strain would have secondary infections. As we know, such infections may just infect under certain conditions. If the patients are well treated and enough careful, second infections may not be able to infect them. As a consequent, antibiotics are not necessary to be taken.

Moreover, the preliminary results of the study could be mistaken. No information about the difference between the patients of the two groups has been provided. If the patients of first g roup are younger, stronger, and more optimistic than the second group, the stronger immune systems could be a more important factor rather than antibiotics. In addition, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine may have a better understanding of the muscle strain than a general physician. May Dr. Newland of first group is more experienced, he or she gave more appropriate and comprehensive treatments to the patients of first group. Thus, antibiotics may not play an important role in the shorter recuperation time. Last but not least, the sugar pills given to the patients may have negative influence on the recuperation of muscle strain. Consequently, may it is the sugar pills increase the recuperation time, but not the antibiotics shorten the recuperation time. In this case, we do not have ample reasons to draw the conclusion.

Finally, even the results of the study are correct, the advice still could not be given to all patients who suffer from severe muscle strain with secondary infections. It is known to all that antibiotics have negative influence on health. They can not only restain the bacteria, and also kill the normal cells of human beings. And the patients may be sensitive to certain antibiotics. Thus, taken antibiotics as part of their treatment in all conditions could bring negative aftermath.

In sum, unless a more comprehensive and farther study are taken to research whether antibiotics have notable effect on the treatment of severe muscle strain with secondary infections, we can not draw a conclution that people who suffer from such strain should take antibiotics as part of their treatment. And, to give advice to all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain, we should get better understanding of their condition, but not take a part for the whole.

cyctUID: 2728144

这篇文章ms争论很多，考虑了好久，大家可以多探讨探讨

桔子susanUID: 2754084

Based on preliminary results of a study, it has been proved that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. As a result, the arguer concluded that all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment. However, several logical flaws may seriously undermine this argument.

First of all, based on the preliminary results of the study, it is unreasonable to deduce the conclusion. The patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain may not suffer from severe muscle strain. It could just be light muscle strain. In this case, the precondition of this conclusion is failed. And no evidence has shown that people who suffer from severe muscle strain would have secondary infections. As we known, such infections may just occur under certain conditions. If the patients are well treated and enough careful, second infections may not be able to infect them. As a consequent, antibiotics are not necessary to be taken. Moreover, the advice still could not be given to all patients who suffer from severe muscle strain with secondary infections. It is possible that antibiotics have negative influence on health. They can not only restrain the bacteria, and also kill the normal cells of human beings. And the patients may be allergic to certain antibiotics. Thus, taken antibiotics as part of their treatment in all conditions could bring negative aftermath.

Besides, the preliminary results of the study could be mistaken. No information about the difference between the patients of the two groups has been provided. If the patients of first group are younger, stronger, and more optimistic than the second group, the stronger immune systems could be a more important factor rather than antibiotics. In addition, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine may have a better understanding of the muscle strain than a general physician. Perhaps Dr. Newland of first group is more experienced, he or she gave more appropriate and comprehensive treatments to the patients of first group. Thus, antibiotics may not play an important role in the shorter recuperation time. Last but not least, the sugar pills given to the patients may have negative influence on the recuperation of muscle strain. Consequently, may it is the sugar pills increase the recuperation time, but not the antibiotics shorten the recuperation time. In this case, we do not have ample reasons to draw the conclusion.

In sum, unless a more comprehensive and farther study are taken to research whether antibiotics have notable effect on the treatment of severe muscle strain with secondary infections, we can not draw a conclusion that people who suffer from such strain should take antibiotics as part of their treatment. And, to give advice to all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain, we should get better understanding of their condition, but not take a part for the whole.

a08805436UID: 2725634

Based on preliminary results of a study, it has been proved that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. As a result, the arguer concluded that all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment. However, several logical flaws may seriously undermine this argument.
First of all, based on the preliminary results of the study, it is unreasonable to deduce the conclusion. The patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain may not suffer from severe muscle strain. It could just be light muscle strain. In this case, the precondition of this conclusion is failed. And no evidence has shown that people who suffer from severe muscle strain would have secondary infections. As we known, such infections may just occur under certain conditions. If the patients are well treated and enough careful, second infections may not be able to infect them. As a consequent, antibiotics are not necessary to be taken. Moreover, the advice still could not be given to all patients who suffer from severe muscle strain with secondary infections. It is possible that antibiotics have negative influence on health. They can not only restrain the bacteria, and also kill the normal cells of human beings. And the patients may be allergic to certain antibiotics. Thus, taken antibiotics as part of their treatment in all conditions could bring negative aftermath.
Besides, the preliminary results of the study could be mistaken. No information about the difference between the patients of the two groups has been provided. If the patients of first group are younger, stronger, and more optimistic than the second group, the stronger immune systems could be a more important factor rather than antibiotics. In addition, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine may have a better understanding of the muscle strain than a general physician. Perhaps Dr. Newland of first group is more experienced, he or she gave more appropriate and comprehensive treatments to the patients of first group (这貌似是两句话，建议加个连词). Thus, antibiotics may not play an important role in the shorter recuperation time. Last but not least, the sugar pills given to the patients may have negative influence on the recuperation of muscle strain. Consequently, may it is the sugar pills increase the recuperation time, but not the antibiotics shorten the recuperation time. In this case, we do not have ample reasons to draw the conclusion.
In sum, unless a more comprehensive and farther study are taken to research whether antibiotics have notable effect on the treatment of severe muscle strain with secondary infections, we can not （cannot） draw a conclusion that people who suffer from such strain should take antibiotics as part of their treatment. And, to give advice to all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain, we should get better understanding of their condition, but not take a part for the whole.
这篇argument的逻辑错误我找的也不准，所以只改了一下句子和词的问题，免得改个错的上去影响你的思路~
总的来说用词 和 句法都很接近范文的水平了
                        by a08805436