tpo13 integrated writing

wyacUID: 2633619

模考版
The reading passage and the lecture conflict with each other about whether the advantages of private commercial fossils outweigh its disadvantages or not.

To begin with, according to the passage, the fact that fossils sold to private collectors makes it inconveniently for the public to watch fossils, which would cause the public pay no attention to the fossils. However, the speaker in the lecture indicates that schools and museums can buy the fossils and then open to the public, hence the fossils is still available for the public and the point in the passage is tenable.

In addition, unlike the writer's opinion that scientists are probably lose approach to important fossils if the fossils are sold to private buyers, the speaker substantiates that the process of fossils unearth need professional skills, accordingly, it's inevitable that the fossils had to pass through the scientists before went to the private buyers, thus the scientists can's miss any important details about the fossils.

Finally, in terms of scientific evidence, the writer asserts that considering the untrained of commercial fossil collectors, they will probably destroy the valuable evidence link to the fossils. Meanwhile, the speaker claims that it is better found the fossils with little damaged than undiscovered.

To sum up, the contents of the passage are refutes by the lecture and the speaker have different views on the topic made in the passage.

wyacUID: 2633619

修改版1.0
The reading passage and the lecture conflicts with each other on the topic whether the benefits of commercial fossil trades outweigh the disadvantages.

To begin with, according to the passage, commercial fossil trades make it inconvenient for the public to watch fossils; consequently, the public is less exposure to the fossils. However, the speaker in the lecture indicates that commercial fossil trades, in fact, make considerable fossils accessible for purchasers, such public institutions as schools and libraries can buy the fossils and then open them to the public. Hence the fossils are still available for the public and the point in the passage isn’t tenable.

In addition, unlike the writer's opinion that scientists are probably lost approach to important fossils, the speaker substantiates that the process of fossils identification needs professional skills. Accordingly, it's inevitable that the fossils have to pass through the hands of scientific experts first before they went to the private collectors, thus the scientists can's miss any important details about the fossils.

Finally, in terms of potential damage, the writer asserts that considering the untrained of commercial fossil collectors, they will probably destroy the valuable evidences link to the fossils. The speaker doesn’t refute this contention directly, instead, she points out that if weren’t for them, there won’t be so many fossils unearthed, she finishes up with an issue that is it better for scientists to have more fossils at the expense of completely scientific data than to have most of the fossils undiscovered?

fatleafUID: 2755291

请问模考和修改版有什么不同？

wyacUID: 2633619

3# fatleaf
模考版是限时写的，听力只听一遍
修改版是基于模考版修改的，听力又听了几遍，自己也检查过拼写和语法错误。

我是chineseladyUID: 2662783

The reading passage and the lecture conflicts with each other好的 on the topic whether the benefits of commercial fossil trades outweigh the disadvantages.

o begin with, according to the passage, commercial fossil trades make it inconvenient for the public to watch fossils; consequently, the public is less exposure to the fossils.开头陈述下好，我也应该的要么文中提的少 However, the speaker in the lecture indicates that commercial fossil trades, in fact, make considerable fossils accessible用得好 for purchasers, such public institutions as schools and libraries can buy the fossils 这里我理解是他们可以参观不是买。。额我也不清楚啊那个教授的声音实在是崩溃and then open them to the public. Hence the fossils are still available for the public and the point in the passage isn’t tenable.  其他细节很恰当

dition, unlike the writer's opinion that scientists are probably lost approach啥方法啊？ to important fossils, the speaker substantiates that the process of fossils identification needs professional skills. Accordingly, it's inevitable that the fossils have to pass through the hands of scientific experts first before they went to the private collectors, thus the scientists can's miss any important details about the fossils. :victory:

Finally, in terms of potential damage嗯好东西, the writer asserts that considering the untrained of commercial fossil collectors, they will probably destroy the valuable evidences link to the fossils. The speaker doesn’t refute this contention directly, instead, she points out that if weren’t for them, there won’t be so many fossils unearthed, she finishes up with an issue that is it better for scientists to have more fossils at the expense of completely scientific data than to have most of the fossils undiscovered? 每次看你的都很享受，很多东西值得学习。上次你说我的作文缺少阅读的东西我也不知道该怎样加上，看看你的嗯学习了希望下次我阅读的东西也提的多些，加油:handshake