【Big Fish】3月11日Issue70-By jjooyy

jjooyyUID: 2704028

TOPIC: ISSUE70 - "In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down
after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."

The statement reveals that every five years, who will be in charge in any fields, should be elected again. At
the same time, companies’ revitalization could be ensured. However, such circumstance does not always fit the
practical. Whether to elect the new leaders depends on whether situations really fit such changes. And the
enterprises can be revitalized by other strategies as well.

First of all, normally, more than five years' controlling in a certain field may lead to all too much power in
one person or one party. When one is in power, it is inevitable to make decisions for his or her
group's sake. Politics could set policies helping the party on his side, businessmen would conduct more
commercial activities with companies that are close to them; even headmasters promote teachers who closely
connect with them. Undoubtedly, more efficiency and effectiveness would be reached by cooperating with people
who are close to them. However, to prevent dictatorship, democracy could only be reached by changing leaders and
their followers within several years.

On the other hand, if the situations are too terrible or too splendid to elect and change, with potential dangers
everywhere, changing leadership could contribute to chaos later. The transferring of power takes time, for the
old passing down regulations, and for the new accepting new positions. Also, there comes a list of changing
interior personnel to support the new ruler. Giving the already disordered condition, any changes would worse
the situations, and enemies certainly would take a good advantage of it. In that case, electing should at least
be postponed to settling down. Similarly, when the leader is on the way to guide the followers to a
peak, changing him or her is not a wise idea, considering the possibility of sacrificing the coming victory.

What is more, enterprises can be revitalized through a variety of different ways, except new leadership. Brand
new advertisements or strategies, or hiring professional consultants in certain areas serve as useful means to save the
companies as well. For instance, the revitalization of McDonald's is due to the development of fast-food chains.
General Motors allied with Suzuki and Isuzu in Japan to sell products internationally. Plenty of methods can
be taken to boost the companies again, of course changing leadership included.

To sum up, although electing for new leadership prevents democracy disappearing, in some circumstances,
continuing obeying the current leader is also advisable. When it comes to enterprises revitalization, all
measures that would make a difference should be taken, including electing leaders.
头大 对商业 政治 真的不擅长 也无例子。。

还是不太肯定改怎么改。。

gaobaoayu123UID: 2740997

确实没有例子感觉前两个论证段比较空：我在位太长举得是毛爷爷 尽管很挫，，，然后在为太短不好写的日本狂换领导人  然后 我也对政治一窍不通
感觉不空的话文章写得挺不错的