- 最后登录
- 2021-2-22
- 在线时间
- 4673 小时
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 声望
- 762
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 907
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 6161
- UID
- 2565872
 
- 声望
- 762
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 907
|
发表于 2010-3-31 00:15:09
|显示全部楼层
11# caoxuemei
The development of a country is up to its various aspects of a country, involving economy, culture, industry, agriculture and so on. As a university student, I think that the function of schools plays a critical role in development of a country. It means improved schools is the most (the most WHAT factor? The question is missing a word here - and you just blindly copied it.) factor in successful development of a country. (Some of these questions circulating around contain very obvious errors. Learn to identify.)
First of all, a successful educational system provides science and technology to citizens. The correlation between technology and success of a country “is surprisingly strong”, observed one? University of Beijing economist in one economy of international study?. Our society abounds with the examples. For instance, my hometown, where set at the countryside in Hebei province, was once is a prosperous state (A 'state' is a 州 in the USA, the approximate equivalent of a 省 in China, so if your hometown is part of a province then it can't be a state.) with producing plastics production. Yet they (Who?) do not try to invest in education, to study new technologies or new materials, or to meeting the updated markets needs. Meanwhile, it make their youth drop out of school and work in factories ; The knowledge and development are ignored. In the more than 20 years since then, while other places of Hebei province have had a drastic change in the industry and economy, my hometown is still in economic stagnation. Such a vivid example that evokes the principle: giving up study is to give up development. (Excellent example, very relevant and specific, but 'giving up study' isn't exactly the same as 'improving schools'. You need to phrase your example in a way that corresponds with the question. The part about 'invest in eduction, study new...' is still okay, but the next part about school drop-outs needs more relevance with 'improving schools'. For example, you can say that the local government never tries to improve the schools as it didn't care about the drop-out rate. The keywords 'improving schools' need to get into there. You also need to get the conclusion back to the 'country' level, instead of stopping at 'development'. In summary, think about how to make your example and conclusion more relevant to the question.)
Moreover, the knowledge that schools gives broadens one's horizons. From sociology to history, from economics to psychology, schools expose various fields to students. Thus people who attend classes could keep themselves informed of what is going on in the world, and avoid being limited. History (of what?) has is filled with these miserable examples, such as the destruction of the Qing Dynasty by clinging to a dated society, to prove that backward knowledge and limited thinking can vanquish a whole country. (Again, your ideas in examples are promising, but you need to phrase the example along the question's keywords, to make the relevance obvious.)
Finally, with the education keep continuously improving, cultural qualities of the people? (Now this is getting a bit too influenced by your native language.) could constantly be improved. The people more peaceful, the country more stable, then the nation would more prosperous. (You need at least one verb in here to make a proper sentence.) Compare A family A with harsh surroundings to B family B with harmonious environment: A family could not communicated with each other well; and fight with each other all day, then no one focuses on the construction of the family. B family with a close relationship concentrates on the family’s strength in a united effort to meet the all of the problems which the family faces. Then the result is loomed? (This doesn't quite mean 'obvious'..rather it means 'exaggeratedly obvious'..) ,B family have being developed well than A family.The homFamily? is a microcosm of a country. (What does the two families example, or the 'microcosm' sentence have to do with 'education' or 'improving schools', anyway? This example goes awry because it was not focusing on the keyword 'education', but on the results - 'people more peaceful', blah blah - of education instead.)
To sum up, technology, broadened horizons, up-dated (It's either 'updated' or 'up-to-date'.) thinking, and cultural qualities of the people are all benefited from the schools improving. Therefore, improving schools is the most factor in successful development of a country.
总结:
语法方面问题不是很大,表达上来说有一些受中文影响的地方需要注意。你的语言其实有些非常出彩的地方,且不说是学来照用的还是真的自己能用,照用能用对,也可算是好的表现。论述上来说在举例方面很有想法 - 但是要注意例子和问题的相关,要让你的例子来说明问题,而不是例子说明你觉得例子能说明的东西。总体来说我觉得你很有潜力,因为你有相当不错的语感。但是我对备考完全没有经验,不能就‘2个月如何系统备考’之类的方面给你建议,这方面版面上有很好的备考指南可以参考。。 |
|