【1010G精英组】ISSUE130 B组回收站

weaselUID: 2739489

上交时间为4月20日13点以前

hopneyUID: 2626063

按照计划，是19号提交，20号是组内互改吧

hopneyUID: 2626063

130"How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society."

This discussion of this issue is about the relationship between how children are socialized today and the destiny of society in future. I cannot agree with the author’s assert for following reasons.
There is a famous maxim Children are the future of a country. Considering the process of socialization, the author claims that how children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. I cannot agree with this statement to some extent for the following reasons.

First of all, the society is made up by people of all the age brackets, such as child, teenage, adult, older. Children are just a small percentage of our human society, which would not extremely determine the whole ages. Even if they might determine it, the society includes other parts, beside of human. Taking technology for example, before the induction of electricity, we use the oil, fire, labor, and livestock like horse as the drive force. But when electricity is invented, it becomes a major drive force in our daily life, and then changes our society.

And statement writes that unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society. I must emphasize that we have learned how to raise children. Form the ancient to now, our ancestor has cultivated many a famous or great achievement persons. Premier Zhou, who has made a great contribution to our country and Chinese people, is an appropriate example. His family well raised him, educated him. When he was in primary school, he made an oath that study hard for Chinese Rising.

What’s more, not every child can help bring about a better society. In every ages, there must be someone is harmful to our society, as well as good people. As we know, in America, hundred civilizers were killed by some violated people with gun every year. Some of them were well educated, but avenged the society for sake of racial discrimination, work pressure and other reasons. In our minds, they surely destroyed the peace and stabilization of our living society, who have nothing to do with bringing about a better society.

To sum up, we can come to some conclusions: first, the density is determined by many factors, not only how children are socialized. Second, human being has learned how to arise child. Finally, not every child is helpful for bringing about a better society, especially the crime maker, violated people.

怎么写着写着感觉跟Arg一样
大约3点
1.社会包括人和物，children只是一部分，其他因素如technology等也影响society，即并非determine
2.不是我们没学会，我们也有很多好的arise children的
3.不是每个children都是help bringing about a better society

weaselUID: 2739489

There is an old saying in China: if you do not move forwards, you must fall back even though you stay where you were. In the same situation, the society can not advance only keeping itself stable. Thus, the destiny of society is not only determined by how children adapt where they live and work, but also by whether they can reform ,because the former is just like keeping stable and the latter presents process.


It is no denying that well-socialized children, who can be well associated with others, can bring us, in the future, a more stable society filled with harmony and vigor. When everyone cooperates with others friendly and closely, the society will form a kind of benign atmosphere. Here is an analogy to support this view: a single stick can be broken easily because it is not strong enough to resist external forces. Everyone in the society can be considered as a stick. When getting closed to each other as if they are stacked and agglomerated, the whole society will be more stable as if the pile of sticks, which are tied together, is usually hard to be broken. In contrast, if each stick fights against the other, there is only one result: they are all broken. It is no doubt that a fundament for further social development will be made by cultivated people if they can be educated to cooperate with others from their childhoods.

However, how can we make the society move forwards?  There is a must that some ones come with talent of reform. As a generally speaking, the ones with reforming spirits can usually possess unique personalities and, creative ideas and values. These characters are essential elements to push a society forward. For instance, in the special period of Chinese Revolution, Lu Xun, one of the most famous writers all over the world, has a unique personality in that period. He chose to be a writer to cure Chinese people’s mental diseases after giving up saving their physical lives. Initially, his ideas and values can not be accepted by major Chinese people. But lately after continuous efforts, his creative ideas, which encourage people to fight for their freedom, have actually deep influence on Chinese literary and Chinese Revolution. Therefore a society that needs advancement must have some reformists whose ideas and personalities differ from mainstream.

To make things worse, some present educational systems gradually pay more attention on generality and practicability, but not personality and creativeness. Under the intense competing social environment, in order to improve kids’ further employments, children are taught how to equip with a skill for surviving and how to adapt the complex society in terms of taking a mask to satisfy others. More and more ignorance on personality and creativeness will lead to society’s lacking capability of reforming. As soon as crisis occurs, the society may fall back and even collapse. So the educational systems have not been ready to cultivate children and even could threaten the destiny of society.

In conclusion, how children are socialized only exert influence on stability of society, society’s further process is determined by children’s unique personalities and creativeness. The education at present has actually not been ready for the future society. Are we standing where we were? What will happen next?

sola-nanaUID: 2744594

130T "How children are socializedtoday determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learnedhow to raise children who can help bring about a better society."




大前提：孩子的社会化决定社会命运
小前提：我们没能培养孩子的社会化
提纲：
正文部分：
1.大前提成立，小前提也成立（第一段让步，同意作者观点）
2.大前提成立，小前提不成立，故结论不成立
3.大前提不成立，不论小前提成不成立，结论都不成立

With the allegation that the future of society is established by how children are socialized and wehave not yet learned how to raise children, the speaker implies the conclusionthat we cannot make a better future. From my perspective, this allegation isthe speaker’s subjective judgment, so, I can partly agree with it in somecertain conditions.

First of all, I concede that, in most cases,how our children are socialized determines the future of our society, and thereare indeed some flaws in our social education system, including the neglect of psychologicalhealth and the wrong induction of mass media. As we can see in the schoolshooting happened in Virginia Tech, the criminal was considered as solitude, autisticwith many obvious behaviors as he would never greet with others initiatively, oreven give any responses to others’ greetings. The college did not realize the potentialdanger, which could be prevented before the tragedy happened. After the schoolshooting, the media, as one of the main approaches through which mass get toknow our society that have a vital effect on mass’s ethics and values, werealways using the word ’tragedy’ instead of ‘murder’. Definitely, American medialeaded by Modern liberal have the responsibility in implying the mass that the criminalis a victim as well by using neuter words, which vague the concept of justice andevil. It cannot be denied that the tragedy could be avoided if our education system could do well in the two aspects above.

Besides, though how socialized our childrendetermines the future of our society, by and large, we have done quite a goodjob in teaching. History is replete with such evidence. Plato couldnot become a philosopher everlasting in history, ifhe did not meet with his mentor, Socrates, who had a big influence on Plato’s choiceof life, and there would not be Academy which is the earliest institution ofhigher education. Aristotle, famous philosopher, scientist and educator in ancientGreek, as a student of Plato, is one of the most important founding figures in Western philosophy. Aristotelianismhad a profound influence on philosophical and theologicalthinking in the Islamic and Jewish traditions in the Middle Ages, and it continues to influence Christian theology, especially Eastern Orthodox theology,and the scholastic tradition of the CatholicChurch.

However, in some situations, how socialized our children are could not determine the destiny of our society. Some children live in enclosed environment at an early age, such as acrobats and athletes, orresearchers who stay in the laboratory all day long. Training and experiment have taken almost all of their time from dawn to dusk. And they hardly have anycontact with the society or they dislike the outside world as a result of beingused to their enclosed life. After all, they are minority which could not determine the destiny of our society as the politicians do.

In sum, it is indispensable that childrenshould be well socialized as they are the future of our society. While, at the same time, we still have a long way to go improving our education, not only in the classroom, but also in the whole society.

贴晚了...

huan19880122UID: 2657720

What’s socialization? Socialization is the general process of acquiring culture. Human infants are born without any culture. They must be taught by their parents, teachers, and others. They learn their language of the culture they are born into as well as the roles we are to play in life. “There is no doubt how children are socialized today determines the destiny of society”. But do we really have not yet learned the way to raise children? No.

Education have been advancing throughout centuries,

Undoubtedly, there are still many insufficient sections in our modern education.

To conclusion,

写不出来 脑子里没东西... 把思路贴出来吧  互改就不要把我算在内了

huan19880122UID: 2657720

3# hopney

我觉得应该换个角度写  文章的篇幅应该用在支持自己的观点上  而不是去反驳题目中的内容  要写成立论文嘛 ~

hopneyUID: 2626063

改weasel

There is an old saying in China: if you do not move forwards, you must fall back even though you stay where you were. In the same situation, the society can not advance only keeping itself stable. Thus, the destiny of society is not only determined by how children adapt where they live and work, but also by whether they can reform ,(这里有点问题,把由1个决定改为由2个决定,这还是很武断)because the former is just like keeping stable and the latter presents process.


It is no denying that well-socialized children, who can be well associated with others, can bring us, in the future, a more stable society filled with harmony and vigor. When everyone cooperates with others friendly and closely, the society will form a kind of benign atmosphere. Here is an analogy to support this view: a single stick can be broken easily because it is not strong enough to resist external forces. Everyone in the society can be considered as a stick. When getting closed to each other(one person is getting closed to others) as if they are stacked and agglomerated, the whole society (本来getting 主语是people，但分句是the society)will be more stable as if the (a)pile of sticks, which are tied together, is usually hard to be broken. In contrast, if each stick fights against the other, there is only one result: they are all broken. It is no doubt that a fundament for further social development will be made by cultivated people if they can be educated to cooperate with others from their childhoods.

However, how can we make the society move forwards?  There is a must that some ones come with talent of reform. As a generally speaking, the ones with reforming spirits can usually possess unique personalities and, creative ideas and values. These characters are essential elements to push a society forward. For instance, in the special period of Chinese Revolution, Lu Xun, one of the most famous writers all over the world, has a unique personality in that period. He choses to be a writer to cure Chinese people’s mental diseases after giving up saving their physical lives. Initially, his ideas and values can not be accepted by major Chinese people. But lately after continuous efforts, his creative ideas, which encourage people to fight for their freedom, have actually a deep influence on Chinese literary and Chinese Revolution. Therefore a society that needs advancement must have some reformists whose ideas and personalities differ from mainstream.

To make things worse, some present educational systems gradually pay more attention on (to) generality and practicability, but not personality and creativeness. Under the intense competing social environment, in order to improve kids’ further employments, children are taught how to equip with a skill for surviving and how to adapt the complex society in terms of taking a mask to satisfy others. More and more ignorance on personality and creativeness will lead to society’s lacking capability of reforming. As soon as crisis occurs, the society may fall back and even collapse. So the educational systems have not been ready to cultivate children and even could threaten the destiny of society.

In conclusion, how children are socialized only exert influence on stability of society, society’s further process is determined by children’s unique personalities and creativeness. The education at present has actually not been ready for the future society. Are we standing where we were? What will happen next?

只发现了几个小问题，：）

weaselUID: 2739489

改 sola

红色：flaw
粉红：comment
蓝色：good job

With the allegationthat the future of society is established by how children are socialized and wehave not yet learned how to raise children, the speaker implies the conclusion thatwe cannot make a better future（创造一个更好的未来？make这个词似乎太笼统，是否可以换个具体的词）. Frommy perspective, this allegation is the speaker’s subjective judgment, so, （这里so后面为什么要打逗号呢？前后都打逗号不是变成了插入语了吗，那么前后这两个长句没有连词连接了？ PS.这方面我不是太确定，望讨论）I can partlyagree with it in some certain conditions.


总体这一段是标准北美范文式的，第一次写的话可以理解怎么干，希望以后渐渐脱去

First of all, I concede that, in most cases, how our children are socializeddetermines the future of our society, and there are indeed some flaws in oursocial education system, including the neglect of psychological health and thewrong induction of mass media. As we can see in the school shooting（which） happened in VirginiaTech, the criminal was considered as solitude（n. the quality or state of being alone or remote from society,来源于韦氏，没有形容词的意思）, autistic with many obvious（是不是加个strange或者odd 好一点呢） behaviors as he would never greetwith others initiatively, or even give any responses to others’ greetings. Thecollege did not realize the potential danger, which could be prevented（明白意思，不过prevent不太准确，可以用阻止潜在的危险？建议整句改成这样if the college realized the potential danger，this kind of tragedy could not happen） before the tragedy happened.{ Afterthe school shooting, the media, as one of the main approaches through whichmass get to know our society that have a vital effect on mass’s ethics andvalues, we real ways using the word ’tragedy’instead of ‘murder’. Definitely, American media leaded by Modern liberal havethe responsibility in implying the mass that the criminal is a victim as wellby using neuter words, which vague（只有adj.的意思）the concept of justice（只有n.的意思） an devil.} It cannot be denied thatthe tragedy could be avoided if our education system could do well in the twoaspects above.

大括号里的两个句子不是太理解，词性有点乱


Besides,though how socialized our children determines the future of our society, by and large, we have done quite a good job inteaching. History is replete withsuch evidence. Plato could not become a philosopher everlasting in history, if hedid not meet with his mentor, Socrates, who had a big influence on Plato’schoice of life, and there would not be Academy which is the earliestinstitution of higher education.（这里应该加个连接词） Aristotle,famous philosopher, scientist and educator in ancient Greek, as a student ofPlato, is one of the most important founding figures in Westernphilosophy. Aristotelianism had a profound influence on philosophical and theological thinking in the Islamic andJewish traditions in the Middle Ages, and it continues to influence Christiantheology, especially Eastern Orthodox theology,and the scholastic tradition of the CatholicChurch.
这里举了很多的例子，缺少一个总结

However, in some situations, how socialized our children are could notdetermine the destiny of our society. Some children live in enclosedenvironment at an early age, such as acrobats and athletes, or researchers whostay in the laboratory all day long. Training and experiment have taken almostall of their time from dawn to dusk. And theyhardly have any contact with the society or they dislike the outside world as aresult of being used to their enclosed life. After all, they are minority whichcould not determine the destiny of our society as the politicians do.

怎么觉得这个例子证明不了你的观点啊，反而是反驳你的观点。。你看我这样理解，运动员和飞行员以及研究人员长期住在封闭的地方不跟外界来往，只有训练和研究，但是他们仍然有机会能改变社会，是不是差不多这样呢？虽然这句话还是有些瑕疵，但是这样逻辑才对吧，你这样是不是默认这些人不能make our society better？
看了最后一句结尾，就更不明白了


In sum, it is indispensable that children should be well socialized as they arethe future of our society. While, at the same time, we still have a long way togo improving our education, not only in the classroom, but also in the wholesociety.

最后总结一下，这个思路是新东方的是吧？虽然我新东方的作文课，没有讲这些，但是我猜测：你上面的三条提纲，应该是三种写作整体的逻辑思路，而不是把三种写作思路用在一篇文章的三段，理由有下面几个。
（1）
你前两段都有一个未经证实的论点就是，how socialized our children determines thefuture of our society
（2）
第三段又提出how socialized our children are could notdetermine the destiny of our society；这就是自己在否定自己，这种自己否定的情况出现在一篇文章的唯一情况就是case by case的手法，略微看出来你有这方面的倾向，但是case by case首先要分清本质，这一点在imong追星箭里有介绍

我举个例子，如果按你第2段的思路来说，提纲应该这样
（1）
howsocialized our children determines the future of our society
（2）
however，我们没能培养好孩子
（3）
因此，我们将不能缔造一个美好的未来
这只是一个逻辑链，内容和观点可以再充实


总体来说，建议浏览一遍论坛的精华帖，推荐追星箭和comorain系列的，在这不是否定尊敬的新东方老师们，但是看看论坛上前辈们的精华才能博采众长，运用好手中的武器。

第一篇，看得出非常认真，继续加油，

欢迎来讨论，本着负责的态度，言语过直，见谅！

sola-nanaUID: 2744594

改 honye

This discussion of this issue is about therelationship between how children are socialized today and the destiny ofsociety in （the） future. I cannot agree with theauthor’s assert (assertion) for followingreasons.
There is a famous maxim Children are the future of acountry(引用是有格式的..这样直接写出来不太合适..). Considering theprocess of socialization, the author claims that how children are socializedtoday determines the destiny of society. I cannot agree with this statement tosome extent for the following reasons.
前两段可以合成一段，是不是写重了？
First of all, the society is made up by people of allthe age brackets 学习下~~, such as child, teenage, adult, older. Children are just asmall percentage of our human society, which would not extremely不合适..determine the whole ages （？不太明白...） Even if they might determine it, thesociety includes other parts, beside of human （？在人类旁边？）. Taking technology for example（没见过这样的用法额...一般都是take .. as an example）,before the induction of electricity, we use the oil, fire, labor, and livestocklike horse as the drive force. But when electricity is invented, it becomes（应该用过去时态吧..） a majordrive force in our daily life, and then changes（我觉得应该用过去时态..） our society.

And statement writes that unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raisechildren who can help bring about a better society. I must我觉得换成have to更好emphasize that we have（加一个already意思更明显哈O(∩_∩)O~） learned how to raise children. Form the ancient to now, our ancestor has cultivatedmany a famous or great achievement persons（- -|汗涔涔..）. PremierZhou, who has made a great contribution to our country and Chinese people, isan appropriate（自己评价自己的例子，我觉得啊，语气应该更肯定一点~用“典型”啊..或者“很好”啊...） example. His family well raised him, educated him. When he was inprimary school, he made an oath that study hard forChinese Rising.有语病

What’s more, not every child can help bring about a better society. In every ages（s去掉）, there must besomeone is harmful to our society, as well as good people（呵呵~意思明白，但这句话是不是有些太简单了呢？）. As we know, in America, hundred civilizers（citizens） were killed by some violated people withgun every year. Some of them were well educated, but avenged the society for（the）sakeof racial discrimination, work pressureand other reasons. In our minds（不合适）, they surely（不合适） destroyed the peace and stabilization of our living society,who have nothing to do with bringing about a better society.

To sum up, we can come to some conclusions: first, the density is determined bymany factors, not only how children are socialized. Second, human beinghas learned how to arise（这个词没有养育的意思） child. Finally, not every child is helpful for bringing about abetter society, especially the crime maker, violated people.

额..简单说一下，结构的话，就觉得前两段是不是写重了...第一、二段最后一句是一个意思啊...
语言希望多练练，多读读，多背背，文章的句式有些单调，有些句子过于简单...（可以尝试把几个简单句套成一个复杂句嘛O(∩_∩)O~）还有些用词也不是很准确，我们都处在不断积累的过程中~~相信咱们的文章一定都能越写越漂亮的~~~加油！！！

sola-nanaUID: 2744594

对批改的一些疑问
紫色是对已有批改有疑问的地方
绿色是我的想法

With the allegation that thefuture of society is established by how children are socialized and we have notyet learned how to raise children, the speaker implies the conclusion that wecannot makea better future（创造一个更好的未来？make这个词似乎太笼统，是否可以换个具体的词）我觉得make没问题..build也可以替换. From myperspective, this allegation is the speaker’s subjective judgment, so, （这里so后面为什么要打逗号呢？前后都打逗号不是变成了插入语了吗，那么前后这两个长句没有连词连接了？ PS.这方面我不是太确定，望讨论）I can partly agree with it in some certain conditions.


总体这一段是标准北美范文式的，第一次写的话可以理解怎么干，希望以后渐渐脱去
模板总结问题..只能从已有文章中总结啊..确实 我还没有怎么总结自己的模板 不知道有什么好办法没啊？？
First of all, I concede that, in most cases, howour children are socialized determines the future of our society, and there areindeed some flaws in our social education system, including the neglect ofpsychological health and the wrong induction of mass media. As we can see inthe school shooting（which） happened in Virginia Tech, the criminalwas considered as solitude本想找个同词根的形容词 用错了...（n. the quality or state of being alone or remote from society,来源于韦氏，没有形容词的意思）, autistic with many obvious（是不是加个strange或者odd 好一点呢） behaviors as he would never greet with others initiatively, or evengive any responses to others’ greetings. The college did not realize thepotential danger, which could be prevented（明白意思，不过prevent不太准确，可以用阻止潜在的危险？建议整句改成这样if the college realized the potential danger，thiskind of tragedy could not happen）~before the tragedy happened.{ After the school shooting,the media, as one of the main approaches through which mass get to know oursociety that have a vital effect on mass’s ethics and values, we real ways using the word ’tragedy’ instead of‘murder’. Definitely, American media leaded by Modern liberal have theresponsibility in implying the mass that the criminal is a victim as well byusing neuter words, which vague（只有adj.的意思）
the concept of justice（只有n.的意思）d在后面（我原文章上是没错的..拍到帖子上d就跑到后面去了）justice and evil就是去justice的名词yisi.. an devil.} It cannot be denied that the tragedy could beavoided if our education system could do well in the two aspects above.
并不是没有论证大前提 不过确实有问题  缺少展开论证的过程  但不知道该怎么展开...
校园枪击案这个例子同时证明了这两个前提 1.罪犯的行为对社会产生了极坏的影响2.社会没能对他进行很好的教育
大括号里的两个句子不是太理解，词性有点乱


Besides, though how socialized our children determinesthe future of our society, by and large, wehave done quite a good job in teaching. History isreplete with such evidence. Plato could not become a philosophereverlasting in history, if he did not meet with his mentor, Socrates, who had abig influence on Plato’s choice of life, and there would not be Academy whichis the earliest institution of higher education.（这里应该加个连接词）恩 缺过渡..这也是我正努力的 Aristotle, famous philosopher, scientist and educator in ancient Greek,as a student of Plato, is one of the most important founding figures in Western philosophy. Aristotelianismhad a profound influence on philosophical and theological thinkingin the Islamic and Jewish traditionsin the Middle Ages, and it continues to influence Christian theology, especially Eastern Orthodox theology,and the scholastictradition of the CatholicChurch. 恩确实少个总结或者验证之类的..写的时候看这段内容比较多就懒了...这里举了很多的例子，缺少一个总结
大前提也有论证同样也是例子中 他们都是对社会影响很大的哲学家
However, in some situations, how socialized ourchildren are could not determine the destiny of our society. Some children livein enclosed environment at an early age, such as acrobats and athletes, or researcherswho stay in the laboratory all day long. Training and experiment have takenalmost all of their time from dawn to dusk. Andthey hardly have any contact with the society or they dislike the outside worldas a result of being used to their enclosed life. After all, they are minoritywhich could not determine the destiny of our society as the politicians do.
怎么觉得这个例子证明不了你的观点啊，反而是反驳你的观点。。（我的意思是那些人从事边缘职业也处于少数很大程度上他们并不能影响社会的发展不像政治家那样有能决定社会命运的权利）你看我这样理解，运动员和飞行员以及研究人员长期住在封闭的地方不跟外界来往，只有训练和研究，但是他们仍然有机会能改变社会，是不是差不多这样呢？虽然这句话还是有些瑕疵，但是这样逻辑才对吧，你这样是不是默认这些人不能make our society better？看了最后一句结尾，就更不明白了
结尾是在说明这两个前提对于结论都很重要
是对以上几段的总结

In sum, it is indispensable that children should be well socialized as they arethe future of our society. While, at the same time, we still have a long way togo improving our education, not only in the classroom, but also in the wholesociety.

最后总结一下，这个思路是新东方的是吧？虽然我新东方的作文课，没有讲这些，但是我猜测：你上面的三条提纲，应该是三种写作整体的逻辑思路，而不是把三种写作思路用在一篇文章的三段，理由有下面几个。
（1）
你前两段都有一个未经证实的论点就是，how socialized our children determines the future of oursociety关于大前提的论证问题我写在每段后面了
（2）
第三段又提出how socialized our children are could notdetermine the destiny of our society；这就是自己在否定自己，这种自己否定的情况出现在一篇文章的唯一情况就是case by case的手法，略微看出来你有这方面的倾向，但是caseby case首先要分清本质（请问本质是什么？哪里有本质问题？），这一点在imong追星箭里有介绍

我举个例子，如果按你第2段的思路来说，提纲应该这样
（1）
how socialized our children determines thefuture of our society
（2）
however，我们没能培养好孩子
（3）
因此，我们将不能缔造一个美好的未来
这只是一个逻辑链，内容和观点可以再充实
你这样还是一个很有争议的issue题目，跟130题目本身一个性质，没能全面分析问题

总体来说，建议浏览一遍论坛的精华帖，推荐追星箭和comorain系列的，在这不是否定尊敬的新东方老师们，但是看看论坛上前辈们的精华才能博采众长，运用好手中的武器。

第一篇，看得出非常认真，继续加油，

欢迎来讨论，本着负责的态度，言语过直，见谅！

sola-nanaUID: 2744594

颜色贴不上...对比着看吧...

youngstoneUID: 2670818

补作业~~
The definition of socialization is quite important to better discussing the issue. Children that are socialized means that they can behave in ways that are acceptable in society. To make it more specific, the mastering of fundamental knowledge, the development of cooperation skills and the clinging to the main values all illustrate the word socialization. There is no doubt that the attitude and behaviors of socialized children play a crucial role in the society today. The family has the important function of socializing children and parents have tried their best to teach their children to contribute more to our society. Schools and universities develop a whole education system to offer a good education. However, we should keep in mind that children’s socialization is not the only or the most important factor to the prosperity of all humans.

How children are socialized shed important light upon the development of our society. Socialized children are familiar with the conditions and mechanisms of the society. As a result, they know how the society works and how to improve the way it works. For example, the solutions of many crucial issues lie on the cooperation and compromise between different nations, such as the restriction on the emission of carbon-dioxide. As a result, many children may make efforts on developing their negotiating skills and ways to persuade others, as well as a set of principles that when and how to compromise. Well-socialized children know how to improve their own skills to make the world better.
Parents always have a high expectation on their children so they make much effort to teach them. Every parent hopes their child will grow up to be a perfect person who can live on his own and thus many parents train their children from their childhood. As far as we know, the education from parents is quite successful in our society. Almost all parents know the necessity to send their children to school, except that they cannot afford it. Parents also tell stories to their children about their own experience and others’ to gradually develop their values of the whole world and thus such kind of education can ensure, to some extent, that their children will obey all kinds of laws and rules when they grow up. Parents encourage their children to play in their neighborhood to make friends with other boys and girls, which is an intention to train their communicating and negotiating skills.

Schools and universities are places to train children to learn the fundamental knowledge, which is a basic understanding of the nature. The physical classes and children’s sports games are all ways to help children to keep healthy and strong, which is also an important part of socialization because a healthy body is a basic condition for survival. We admit that universities and schools cannot provide such education to all the children in the world because the number of schools is so limited while some children are too poor to afford the school fee. And it is just the implementation of education, not meaning we do not know how to raise children.

But we should keep in mind that socialization is not the only or the most important factor in bringing about a better society. Besides this, the expertise and the spirit of pertinence, for example, are both important factors to bring a better society. To make progress in a certain subject, one must learn deeply and think thoroughly. Thus only a basic knowledge of the nature needed to live in society is obviously not enough. Our society is pushed by inventions, new theories, etc, so expertise is quite a non-neglectable factor. To keep on progressing, one may face huge difficulties stopping him from moving on. At that time, the spirit of pertinence plays an important role. No matter how socialized a child is, without expertise and the spirit of pertinence, it is very hard for them to make valuable contributions to bring about a better society.

To sum up, it is indispensable to raise children to a more socialized condition, and we know how to do it. What remains to be done is the implementation of our education and its spread to rural and poor areas. An important thing we should keep in mind is that children’s socialization is not the only or most important factor to make our society better. The expertise, pertinence and other related characters are all significant.