- 最后登录
- 2011-6-20
- 在线时间
- 223 小时
- 寄托币
- 252
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-4
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 187
- UID
- 2845947

- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 252
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-4
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
本帖最后由 alicken 于 2010-7-15 19:02 编辑
This statement claims that a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards in order to be an effective leader. That seems to mean that an(a) current relationship between effective and the highest ethical and moral standards. However, I don't agree with this statement completely(太绝对,可能后面不好写).
I agree that a public official maintains the highest ethical and moral standards can be an effective leader. As we know, persons prefer to vote the one who maintains the highest ethical and moral standards from 3000 years ago to the modern society. This conclusion can be assumed by the phenomena that if one party want(wants) to defeat another party in the competition, they might dig or make many bad thing which will make the enemy's ethical and moral weak. It is clearly, if the public get information (of) such thing, they will never truest the leader the(with) low ethical and moral standards.
However, a leader to be an effective leader only when he or she maintains the highest ethical and moral standards?(However, only when a leader maintains the highest ethical and moral standards can he or she be a effective leader?) The answer is NO. The statement is said to be point out that maintaining the highest ethical and moral standards is one of the important quality to be an effective leader. And that is the question , (But the question is) if one person who doesn't maintains the highest ethical and moral standards, he or she cannot be an effective leader?
As we konw,(去掉逗号) the human beings is one kind of animals which like gathering together. In(As) a result, there are various kinds of groups in the world. And in order to achieve a goal, there must be a leader who can lead the group (to) improve and get the final achievement. To be an effective and success leader, he or she should process various qualities such as the ability of leadership(leadership), the current discussion when facing the emergence(是不是emergency), the sense of trust or home that should give the group members.(such as 后接名词,应该不能接句子) That is to say, anyone can be an(a) success leader when they maintain the basic qualities.
However, they are different definition between the success leader and the effective leader. (其实从effective的定义开始论述很好嘛,就从这里展开,但是后面好像没有提到different definition)
It seems that the long distance from success and the effective is the highest ethical and moral standards.(是不是想表达effective和moral无关?) Let's imagine a view, one person drunk day and night and make many mistakes everyday, and another person control himself very well, he never drunk, he only had one love, and had a high response for his career. Which one do you think will be success? I believe that most of people will choose the second one. And now, I tell you the answer, the first people is the most success president in American, Benjamin Franklin, and another one is the biggest enemy of the world, Hitler. It is the truth that F is a totally loser in his own life, However, anybody cannot agree that he is one great person in the history any more.
In addition, persons (can) always forgiving the disadvantages of others easily. If a leader who has some small disadvantages will achieve the goal by leading a group successfully, the people will like he or she as usual. In sum, to be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
红色是错误,蓝色是建议
基本同意2楼的观点,但是应该说还是没有偏题,只是论述不够有力。
小F和小H的例子可以用,但是还是要把小F说得委婉点。
还有,感觉作者在论证:一个有效地领到者不一定要有道德,只要其他方面的能力强就可以了。我觉得这样有点绝对,确实不好论述,不如就抓住题目中的highest,论述:可能一个领导人在道德上不是那么高尚,但他在其他方面的能力很强,也能成为effective leader.
水平有限,只能改成这样了,仅供参考
共同努力 |
|