还有4.5天~发两篇艺术类高频的提纲

追梦小木耳UID: 2781857

写前花了很长时间列了下提纲。写的内容和提纲不全一样，但思路一样

TOPIC: ISSUE131 - "The arts (painting, music, literature, etc.) reveal the otherwise hidden ideas and impulses of a society."

（1）最本质的艺术是什么？是表达艺术家思想、情感的一种形式。绘画通过颜色情感，内容思想；音乐表达情感；文学寄托心情、思想。
（2）由于艺术这种间接的表达方式，可以反映舆论不能反映的事实。比如文艺复兴时，宗教控制舆论，艺术家通过艺术作品表达新的思想
（3）艺术家来自底层，可以反映社会最深刻的问题。历史是由统治者书写，如果不是艺术家，很多社会现实会被掩盖。这就是为什么我们会通过小说、戏剧研究历史，研究底层人民的生活


TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."

*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

(1)艺术家创造了价值。艺术的价值是指他们高超的技艺和所表达的思想
（2)评论家发现艺术的价值。评论家不仅代表自己的审美，还代表一个时代。但是艺术的价值要靠评论家去挖掘。高雅艺术观众欣赏不了，不代表没有价值
（3）评论家决定哪些价值应该永恒。不仅找到艺术的价值，还决定价值，指引艺术的未来。19世纪以来的艺术关注自然，反映社会问题。这种趋势是受到评论家影响的。

wdx19861106UID: 2821198

“艺术家来自底层，可以反映社会最深刻的问题。”感觉改一下，“大部分艺术家来自底层”？？
感觉按你的提纲，131 可能比较难写，呵呵，要求的功力太深了。

两个提纲都挺不错的。

兄弟，加油！！！

1# 追梦小木耳

lingli_xiaoaiUID: 172506

艺术家来自底层

I agree with ls...

I would use some or few....common sense is that only when you don't have to worry about food, then you can do arts...

the example you used is good, but only literature, that's writers. Probably only artists can come from the bottom of the society, writing costs almost nothing. others like music, fine arts...people are almost all coming from higher social status. Even today, only people from rich family can afford study arts at will.  

other that than.... your outline seems really good. I can see you did think about those topic..good luck with your exam.

asd9061UID: 2668238

LZ的文章读起来给人一种很舒服的感觉，相当流畅啊，这点我应该学习

以下是个人感觉的一些问题：
1.  In 18th century, the composers like Beethoven and A created music for their students or the aristocracy.【这一句什么意思？LZ是不是没写完？】

2. The arts with lasting value not only be appreciated in their times, but be admired in the future. 【那个be之前是不是应该有个should之类的，否则动词形式不对啊】

3. LZ前半部分文章的逻辑足够清晰。但是从第三段中间“Some may argue that ”那里开始就有点乱了。Internet show new art works 感觉不能构成对前面评论家甄选好作品的一个反驳，恰恰是Internet的大量信息导致了更需要评论家选择好的作品。

第四段个人读的不太清楚。LZ应该是想证明“评论家使得value更为持久”，但感觉这个论点本身就包含了第三段的论点：因为评论家能够发掘好的作品，所以其value才能够持久。 另外接下来的一句：Then who decide the standard of arts value at present and in the future? The answer is critics.   感觉论点有点太强了吧，直接用了decide.  并且，再接下来的例证感觉也不太合适：19世纪的艺术关注社会问题，这是受到评论家影响，但不一定评论家就是主要影响，例证本身不够具体。毕竟艺术关注社会问题与社会背景，艺术家的状况也有很大关系，不完全是由于评论家。

大概是LZ写到后面，有点累了吧，所以思路上后半部分明显不如前半部分了。提纲的前两点肯定没问题的，但是第三点觉得还应斟酌一下。

以上纯属个人意见~~如有偏狭之处还望多多包涵~

另外，欢迎回拍ISSUE144：https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1127860-1-1.html

figuechenUID: 2850619

就改一下第二篇吧~

第二篇
TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."

*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
WORDS: 432  708        TIME: 00:40:00          DATE: 2010-7-23 12:49:18

The lasting value of arts lies in the fact that they show the exceptionally high skills and express the emotions of the artists as well as their deep thought of the world and society. Admittedly, it is the artists who create the value. But it is the critics who find the value and introduce it to the public. They make the value long lasting in society.

The artists create assorted great works and give value to them. All the works show their extraordinary skills of writing, singing, acting or painting. They have brought beauty and entertainment to society, and more than that, they also indicate the brilliant ideas of the artists. Many artistic works have displayed the outstanding talent creation and imagination of human beings. For instance, the impressionists have used the various colors and abstract images to express their impression of the nature in certain moments. Nowadays, we still can feel the beauty of nature and the strong emotion from Monet’s Sunrise. It is the artists, who are regarded to have lightened the culture and created the value.

However, it is the critics who discover the value of art works and introduce them to society. The critics have the sharpest sight and most of them are representatives of people's view of beauty. They see a large proportion of artistic works and select the ones with values to the public. Without them, the value of certain works and the intelligence can hardly be known. For instance, if a new novelist has written a great novel, there would be seldom readers who notice that since paramount writers are publishing new books everyday and it is too difficult for the readers to select the best ones. But if the novel is recommended by critics, the reader would tend to buy and read it to see if it is that good. Some may argue that the Internet nowadays has been a effective place to show new art works to the public. However, from my perspective, since not all great arts are understandable to general people, some high value arts would not be known in this circumstance. There exists a number of high arts [我不知道是不是有high arts这个说法。。。求教]that are not as attractive as popular arts, but contains true value. Their high skill [同上，skill能用high修饰么？求教]and deep meaning can only be found by the critics who have professional knowledge and experience. For instance, the classic music is hard to understand and not as entertaining as pop music. However, they involve the most complex performing skills and deep emotions which can hardly be exceeded. In 18th century, the composers like Beethoven and A created music for their students or the aristocracy. Though not popular with the populace, they still stand out today. Thus, it is the critics who find the value of these talent works and introduce them to society.
[一个小建议，这段的最后怎么突然举例说古典艺术的高深了？可以说一下批评家在古典音乐欣赏中的作用，这样似乎更切题吧]
Furthermore, it is the critics rather than the artists who make the arts last long. The arts with lasting value not only be appreciated in their times, but be admired in the future. Then who decide the standard of arts value at present and in the future? The answer is critics. Other than the outstanding skills, the great arts in modern times are always aimed at probing nature and society, expressing artists' the deep concern toward the world. This trend started in 19th century when science and technology were rapidly developing and social problems caught attention. It is the critics who approved the arts relevant to the evolution of society and encouraged the modern arts to develop to what they are today. They have found the artists' ideas that were closest to society which deserve long-term attention. And they also direct the viewers and readers' views, showing them not only treat the arts as entertainments but also appreciate the inside ideas and pay attention to the problems revealed. As a result, the critics not only discover the value of arts but make the value lasting in society.
[批评家决定了艺术的价值？有个问题：那一个时代的人对某艺术作品不屑一顾，后时代的人却又对其趋之若鹜。批评家在里面究竟起了什么作用？他们之前的无视让该作品门可罗雀，而后突然的转向却又让形势峰回路转。我觉得不是批评家在起作用，而是整个时代的审美眼光在起作用，所以应该是一个时代的人在起作用，批评家只是他们的代表者而已，不应该被列为主要的因素。]

To conclude, the artists create the values while the critics introduce the valuable works to the public and make the value long lasting. Both the artists and critics are necessary to the development of arts. They not only provide beauty and entertainment, but also call for our attention to the social problems.

我觉得提纲很不错，文笔也很流畅，段落之间和段落内的逻辑相当清晰。可以再提高一下语言的质量，包括增加语言的多样性，以及某些高级句法的运用。这样就更好了~

追梦小木耳UID: 2781857

7# figuechen

高雅艺术 elegant art or fine art
high art 用的比较少

追梦小木耳UID: 2781857

LZ的文章读起来给人一种很舒服的感觉，相当流畅啊，这点我应该学习

以下是个人感觉的一些问题：
1.  In 18th century, the composers like Beethoven and A created music for their students or the aristocrac ...
asd9061 发表于 2010-7-24 11:36

~不好意思，那个例子本来是没想起来，后来忘了删掉了~

确实b3的议论很弱，提纲写的时候觉得很容易，但是写出来就不知道怎么说了~这个论据的确占不住脚

追梦小木耳UID: 2781857

5# lingli_xiaoai

的确。其实是本来很多艺术家原来家境不错，但是后来不能靠自己的作品挣钱就穷困潦倒了

gtjohnUID: 2813321

10# 追梦小木耳
很多艺术家本来穷困潦倒，后来变得很有钱了

追梦小木耳UID: 2781857

10# 追梦小木耳
很多艺术家本来穷困潦倒，后来变得很有钱了
gtjohn 发表于 2010-7-24 22:06

小哀版主的意思是，有些艺术没有钱学不起。
比如音乐啊、绘画啊

冰雪翎岚UID: 2846844

唔...哥白尼最后好像是病死的...好像...