- 最后登录
- 2012-4-24
- 在线时间
- 165 小时
- 寄托币
- 755
- 声望
- 27
- 注册时间
- 2010-3-16
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 765
- UID
- 2781857
 
- 声望
- 27
- 寄托币
- 755
- 注册时间
- 2010-3-16
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
发表于 2010-7-31 23:03:20
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 追梦小木耳 于 2010-7-31 23:05 编辑
In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the cours ...
Milo1990 发表于 2010-7-31 19:22 
The speaker claims that in order for a more qualified education at any college or university, all faculty should take a job relevant to his or her field outside campus. I concede that it has its merit in certain aspect regarding certain courses 什么意思?? offering students essential work skill and experiences in their future job. However, not every theory can be got in jobs especially those regarding high-techs. Furthermore in other courses, say, mathematics and physics and some purely academic ones, this would do little help and even might impeding effective teaching or learning. And as for the broader purpose of education- acquire critical thinking- has nothing to do with the job stuff at all.
Before we go any further, we should at least define the purpose of education. One of the purpose of education, is to acquire certain skills for certain job in future,语言缺少变化,一句出现两个certain thus contributing to societies in turn. And another equally important one, especially for advanced education in college and university, is helping its students finding his or her unique way of examing the world and how it works. Only by this can a person decide what is right and what is wrong then become critical. As long as the two purposes are better achieved, we can call an education system is effectively improved. For the later purpose, it obviously has nothing to do to with teacher whether to taking take a job or not. What does count is that our educators show students the cause-effect relationship or other factors behind certain theory to develop their own method of thinking instead of just reciting or repeat lessons.
教育者怎么传授这些思考、探索的方法呢?和工不工作有什么关系呢?既然提到了教育的目的,也应该回答一下这两个问题吧。下面你虽然说了有些应用学科教授应该有工作经验的作用、好处,但也没有提effective education.那么你这里讨论有效的教育目的何在??
As for the first one 不好意思,没看出来指代的是啥~, it has certain beneficial for improving education quality in some job-centered fields to acquire its faculty to spending time in real works. After all, these fields, such as architectural architecture, engineering, or and business management is are about teaching skills and techniques that would be useful in practice. If the profession professor takes a job outside campus, knowing what exact skills and techniques are mostly needed in work, he or she will emphasize those aspects in class making sure all students mastered them. Thus, students will skillfully handle problems in their future job, making their very best to contribution to society.
However, on the other hand, not all the skills that students might use in future would come form the job which their profession is taking. In any given job, one's work is just part of whole procedures; no one can acquire all the skills in one single position. For examples one need look no more than the field of architecture. There several sub-realms in term to the position its students occupied in future job, such as project making, plan designing, CAD drawing, and so forth. As for different sub-realms, lies its own method dealing with problems. It is unrealistic to expect one professor from one single position of work to teach all of the skills in the whole field.
不是所有的知识老师都能教。不明白你这一段论述和你的观点有什么关系。既然你认为老师出去工作的好处之一是可以让学生更好的掌握知识、在将来应用。你现在又提出有些知识老师不教,不是攻击自己的观点了吗??
Further more Furthermore, when it comes to certain fields, which are purely academic like mathematics, physics, asking professors spending to spend time outside campus would even server severe??不知道你想用哪个词to undermine the purpose of achieveing essential knowledge and skills. Those courses are totally about theory, and have nothing to do with a specified job. Not only students could learn nothing form his or her teachers' job experience, but also the quality of academic teaching would be diluted by exhausted energy of its teacher taking an extra job.
In final analysis, as for the broader purpose of education, developing critical thinking has little to do with teachers taking a job outside academic world. 最后怎么又扯到了辩证思维呢??前面说effective education也没有提呀!While for the skill-provide aspect, it is insufficient to provide all aspects of techniques concerned. Only certain job-centered courses would be beneficial in certain sub-realm, while to other sub-realms, it still remains useless. Further, in theory-centered fields such as mathematics and physics it would eventually server to demean the quality of education.
除了以上提出的问题,最大的问题是语言。错误太多,缺少多样性。有些用法改了,有的词用黄色标出,自己改改吧
建议好好列下提纲,严格按照提纲来写作 |
|