issue 94 求点评提纲和作文

joannajiUID: 2239264

9月初考。不知道来不来得及。

谢谢热心版友。
有三个问题：
1，写issue作文要根据已有的提纲吗？练习的时候是不是就按照已有的提纲去考虑问题？
2，究竟是应该直接按照新东方的分类来写，还是按照什么标准来开始写作文呢？
3，先准备issue再准备arguement是好的方法吗？还是应该同时准备？


91. Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.


提纲：
开头：作者观点很好，方法我完全不同意。
1．（+）学习不同专业有利于互相促进，在自然科学领域，比方说居里夫人懂得物理和化学，使得她能够获得两次巨大的成功。这是好的教育方法。

2．（+）在arts领域也是，e.g. 在语言领域里。比方拉丁语和古英语，比方东北亚语言体系中的韩文和日文； 即使是不同的语言体系，同时了解不同的语言，对选择该领域的学生的教育来说，也是互相有促进作用的。所有的这些促进作用，都局限于理智合理的选择。

3．（-）如果选择不合理，因为时间有限。学习不同的专业会浪费很多时间。科技已经发展到使得学科之间的沟壑很深，如果不按照一定的原则，或者根据个人的状况随意学习不同体系的东西反而会导致浮光掠影，什么都没学会，尤其是作为大学生，尚未发展出本身的专业部分，这样的情况下，学得过杂便不是好的教育方法。

4. （-）进一步，就可行性而言，大学里会简单的要求选修外系的课程，真正认真学习希望在某个领域有所造诣的学生很可能选择一些容易得高分而不用太多时间的课程，比方说体育等。这些毫无关系的课程，纯粹为了学分。这样带有诱导作用的规定，又何谈好的教育方法。
结论：在一定范围内和一定的指导下，学习不同的课程，确实是好的教育方法。但是不适合作为规定，强求所有学生都去遵守。



作文：
The author claimed that the university should require every student to
take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study based on the reason that various academic disciplines is good to true education. I concede that in some level the authors point about the taking different courses are good. Beyond this concession, however, the author’s intention to make it into rules, are not so wise choice, considering about the feasibility and reality.

In the science and technology area, I would agree with the author because one of the most important features of modern science and technology is interdisciplinary. Like nanotechnology are quintessence of physics and chemistry. Taking different courses, like basic chemistry elements properties and experimental methods, will offer the physics majoring students lots of vantages. E.g. Madam Curie, who won the Nobel Prize twice, one is in physics, and the other is the famous physicist, who also profession in chemistry. She understands physics well which makes her knew there maybe some new element possibly exists in asphalt, and she knows chemistry, which offers her method to find them.

In arts realm, similar things are also going on, even more cogent. Taking linguistics for example, Language can never develop alone without culture, which is also influenced by politic and economy. English has so many intercrosses with Latin and French, 70% of Korean comes from Chinese. Obviously taking classes about foreign civilization would help those students majoring in their narrow field of some pure kink language. One truth is that most linguists are bilingual or polyglot.

Taking another perspective, however, making politics are not so simple. The author’s good wishes may be probably counterproductive. We always know that taking different courses will intrigue a serious problem need to be overcome which is limited time and vigor. People do not have interminable time to devote to everything. Taking too much non relevant classes will only distract the students, leading to confuse and superficial. Madam Curie actually won two fields of Nobel Prize, yet we need to understand that during her era, physics and chemistry has no chasm like they do nowadays. With the science and technology developing, the fissure between different disciplines expands. Not mention that between different disciplines, even inside a same academic field, like physics, condensed physics and high energy physics nearly share little common. They do not even share the calculating methods. So it is not reality to study variety of courses outside your field, in one’s time-confined life.

Still, considering the feasibility, most universities would simply ask students to take outside-department courses, which probably induce students to choose those courses which will lead to higher grades while taking less time, not mention that they will consider the meaning of these chosen courses. In this background, except the waste of time to take a meaningless class, is there any goodness to the students? How can we say that the rules are truly education?

In conclusion, we may say that in some specific environment and instruction, learning different courses besides major is helpful to students, in another way, however, making this thought into real prescriptions, are not so wise choice anymore.

美丽太阳花UID: 2798404

作文我是按照高频分类并且结合高频来分类练习的。
即先写高频那几个，再归类，因为你会发现很多题目是类似的
你9月初考，时间完全来得及，没问题的，大概30天准备就差不多了、

joannajiUID: 2239264

2# 美丽太阳花

谢谢谢谢！

呵呵，十分担心始终没人理呢：）

可有热心的版友帮忙改下作文，或者指出提纲中的问题也好。
我现在对什么是好作文还没一点概念，看范文，和自己思路也不太一样。