高频issue56

zxwhy825UID: 2668443

题目：ISSUE56 - "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
字数：419
用时：00:44:26
日期：2010-8-5 下午 04:39:27

【i原文】Governments' duty, broadly defined as keeping the society steady and stable, at the same time promoting the progress of the society. According to governments' duty, it is too hasty to generlize whether governments should focus more on solving the immediate problem rather than the aniticapted problems or not. To effectively finish their social mission, governments should
take a balance of the immediate and anticipated problems.

Without the solution of problems of today, the society will confront chaos,resulting in failure to complete even the rontine work of government. In retrospect to the strike of HongKong last century, because of the ignoring of the salary and wellfare condition of the cleaners, the once perprous^ city, known as the pearl of the East Asia, was masked with rubbish and waste. The smelly smell prevent the residents away from the street, needless to refer to work. Similar strikes happen almost in every contries in some extent, which extremely impede the development of the society.

So what about neglect the anticipated problems? Maybe even worse. The beginning of world war II, exemplified the lesson perfectly. At the start of world war II, England, France both enjoyed the masked peace, trying to urge the German aggress the Soviet Union, to keep their peace. However the overlook of the potential ambition of German, let them miss the last chance to stop the worldwide war which destroyed the whole world, including England and France. Similar tragedies, happens in almost every field, just like a bable:the once beautiful bable only concerns to fly higher and grow bigger,whose pride and greed mask its wise and prospective eye from the explosion destiny. ^^

However,after stepping into the millennium, things appear more complex than ever before. The globalization of the world knitting the whole things together that immediate problems of today and anticipated problems of the future may even turn into each other or overlap in some degree. For instance, the terriosism seems a potential problem before the event "911". However, hearing of loud noise of
the falling of the skyscrapers, the government suddenly realized it's an immediate problem, setting battle in Afgania and Irap. Then nowadays, the terriosism turns potential again.

In sum, considering the complex environment, the governments should stike to their duty to protect the peace and propel the society advant. It is only a stragedy to choose focus on immediate or anticipated problems. Goverments should change their stragedy with the changing of the environment, in order to fulfill its duty. Sometimes, they can even take a balance.



【i修改】Governments' duty, broadly defined as keeping the society steady and stable, at the same time promoting the progress of the society. According to governments' duty, it is too hasty to generalize whether governments should focus more on solving the immediate problem rather than the anticipated problems or not. To effectively finish their social mission, governments should take a balance of the immediate and anticipated problems.

Without the solution of problems of today, the society will confront chaos and confusion, resulting in failure to complete even the routine work of government. In retrospect to the strike of Hong.Kong last century, because of the ignoring of the salary and welfare condition of the cleaners, the once palmy city, known as the pearl of the East Asia, was masked with rubbish and waste. The smelly smell prevents the residents away from the street, needless to refer to work. Similar strikes happen almost in every country in some extent, which extremely impede the development of the society.

So what about neglect the anticipated problems? The consequence may be even worse. The beginning of World War II, exemplified the lesson perfectly. At the start of World War II, England, France both enjoyed the masked peace, trying to urge the German aggress the Soviet Union, to keep their peace. However the overlook of the potential ambition of German, let them miss the last chance to stop the worldwide war which destroyed the whole world, including England and France. Similar tragedies, happens in almost every field, just like a bubble: the once beautiful bubble only concerns to fly higher and grow bigger, whose pride and greed mask its wise and prospective eye from the explosion destiny. ^^

However, after stepping into the millennium, things appear more complex than ever before. As the globalization of the world knitting the whole things together, immediate problems of today and anticipated problems of the future may even turn into each other or overlap in some degree. For instance, the terrorism seems a potential problem before the event "911". However, hearing of loud noise of the falling of the skyscrapers, the government suddenly realized it's an immediate problem, setting battle in Afghan and Iraq. Then nowadays, the terrorism turns potential again.

In sum, considering the complex environment, the governments should stick to their duty to protect the peace and propel the society forward. It is only a tactic to choose focus on immediate or anticipated problems. Governments should change their tactic with the changing of the environment, in order to fulfill its duty. Sometimes, they can even take a balance.


香港怎么word 提示错误？



注意拼写， 单复数
福利制度
Babble 唠叨 bubble泡泡
恐怖主义terrorism
阿富汗Afghan
香港

zxwhy825UID: 2668443

谢谢。。求P