Issue212求猛批，留链必回

nijiaqinUID: 2856025

题目：ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."

In recent years, the topic of the methods to reach our goals is so hot that people varying from backgrounds as well as personalities tend to observe this same issue from diversified perspectives. A widely accepted viewpoint claims that any means should be allowed to be taken if the target is valuable. Although I'm not pleased with the feeling of being an critic, I would rather stand on the opposite of this point of view and reckon that to define whether a goal is worthy or a mean is justifiable is not so simple as it seems like.

First of all, I have to concede that as we are living in such a complicated society, some tasks may seem not able to be solved with traditional methods. In such occasions, we would find it hard to get a distinct progress without utilizing our creations. A story happened in a soap factory may serve as an appropriate example to strengthen my claim. A significant machine in that factory got something mistake which made that some of the soap boxes were failed to be filled in a soap. It would be a disaster to sell such "soaps" to customs, however all the engineers of the factory had tried their best and still can mend the machine thoroughly. When the manager had begun to prepare for saying sorry to their angry clients and bearing heavy loss, an ordinary worker of the factory rescued him: the clever young fellow put an electric fan aside of their product line. The result is too simple to guess: all the empty boxes were blown away and only those with a soap inside can stay on the line.

Nevertheless, it is a complex question that whether a goal is worthy or not and may get dissimilar explanations in different periods of history. We used to burn forest in order to plant more wheat, but now our authority is considering growing more trees on ploughs. Decades ago cars are the symbol of modern society in many peoples' eyes, however these vehicles are more likely to be connected with air pollutions, noises and traffic jams up-to-date. All of these experiences tell us that as today's meat may become poisons in the future, that’s why taking more factors into consideration is a necessity before we make the decision.

At last, sometimes our behaviors actually have a prominent effort on attaining the goal, but they may be harmful to someone else at the same time. Every responsible human being is not supposed to build his happiness on other's sadness. During the World War II, the American government finally decides to use the A-bomb to attack the fascistic Japan. Maybe the warfare had got an earlier ending for several months which means less expense on money and soldiers of the alliance constructed by US, UK, USSR and China, but an avalanche of innocent Japanese residents are still suffering from awful diseases caused by the strong radiation up to the present, and many of the scientists who used to help invent the A-bomb were therefore agonized by their conscience until depth.

To sum up, the answer of whether an aim is worthy or not is always changing as the time goes. On the other hand, a person who only consider about his own benefits is a selfish guy and can hardly reach real success.

leexiaojuUID: 2873116

咱俩互批吧^_^
TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."
只要值得，不择手段达到目的是合理的。

It has long been controversial that any means of attaining a worthy goal is justifiable. The hot debate focus mainly on two key words, "worthy" and "any". In other words, people question what is a common and rational criterion of "worthy" other than personal judgement, and whether "any" measure can be taken regardless of tradional discipline, socail regulations and personal situations. Due to the complication of this issue, the assertion should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

To begin with, we are obliged to have a clear knowledge if what kind of a goal can be called a worthy goal. Only according with personal or a small group’s interests and persuits is far from the true essential of "worthy". I believe a worthy goal ought to be resonable and justicial, rational subjectively and correct objectively and answering for the tide of historical development and
fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of people who are surely the judges. If so, any means taken for the goal deserves to be justifiable. Take World War Two for example. In 1945, in order to end the anti-fascist war and renew the order and peace of the world rapidly, America finally has to put two atomic bombs into use against Japan to force Japan to surrender immediately. Though the atomic bomb is always regarded as an immoral and devastating weapon, who knows how many years the fascist continues to commmit evils during which millions of lives will be killed without using the atomic bomb? So for such a goal to maintain the justice and peace of world, it’s justifiable for America pitching the atomic bomb.

Moreover, considering the goal for independence and freedom, we can perceive more insightful models. While some goals may be achieved at the expense of innocent people killed or maimed by unavoidable wars sometimes, I still believe that these efforts in reaching a goal are valuable. For instance, without such leaders as chairman Mao and Martin Luther King struggling for their ultimate ideals, China might still be the colonies of Japan and African Americans might remained to be relegated at the backs of buses. Even though they devote their lives to the career or sacrifice many other innocent people, the means of attaining these goals is worthy.

Notwithstanding the foregoing favors to the speaker’s assertion, I would be hard-pressed to consider the feasibility of means for any goal which is as worthy as what I define. Obviously, we can’t extend the example of America above to embrace all the situations. Can a government develop local ecomony without caring the damage to the environment? Will it be permitted that the manufacturers join in the unfair competitions and deceive customers for more profits? What do you think of cheating in examinations for students to get better academic performance? Their goals are originally right and worthy of being persued, but the means are not advocated, some of which are even against law. All these reveal that human activities should be under certain restrictions and control, on which part of the meanings of law lies. Accordingly, before we hastily make a decision which may be controversial, we should take into consideration the ethic standard we cherish and laws we must abide by.

In summary, the claim that if a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable can not be applied to every aspect of human endeavors. We humans should learn to judge the rationality, feasibility and worthiness of measures according to the value of ethics and laws.

nijiaqinUID: 2856025

我们俩居然使用了这么相同的例子，诸如环保、原子弹……这应该算是缘分还是我们选材都太俗了呢~~~
读完你的文章，总体感觉你的语言比我好很多，用词也比较高端，加上例子选取大家也差不多，别的也许我给不了太多的建议，但是有一点也许可以探讨：你的观点总的来说应该是站在题目的反面的吧，但是你的Body部分三段中似乎有两段是在写支持题目的东西。让步当然是必不可少的，但是按照一般的逻辑，总不能让步占的篇幅比自己的观点还要多吧~~当然你的语言真的很值得我学习，鄙人水平有限，就先说这么多，大家共同努力吧

leexiaojuUID: 2873116

我觉得我的观点不是站在题目的反面，只是寻求一种平衡，不同的事情要不同的对待，大概就是这个意思，不知你同意不？你看我在第一段并没有用agree或者disagree之类的词，而且我点明了case by case
关于“环保”我也就是写了一句话，完全可以换一个一句话的例子代替，至于原子弹，我想大家都很容易想到这一点，因为这个例子太合适了，呵呵

tracyrongyiUID: 2842378

In recent years, the topic of the methods to reach our goals is so hot that people varying from backgrounds as well as personalities tend to observe this same issue from diversified perspectives. A widely accepted viewpoint claims that any means should be allowed to be taken if the target is valuable.I'm not pleased with t Although he feeling of being an critic, I would rather stand on the opposite of this point of view and reckon that to define whether a goal is worthy or a mean is justifiable is not so simple as it seems like.

First of all, I have to concede that as we are living in such a complicated society, some tasks may seem not able to be solved with traditional methods. In such occasions, we would find it hard to get a distinct progress without utilizing our creations. A story happened in a soap factory may serve as an appropriate example to strengthen my claim. A significant machine in that factory got something mistake which made that some of the soap boxes were failed to be filled in a soap. It would be a disaster to sell such "soaps" to customs, however all the engineers of the factory had tried their best and still can mend the machine thoroughly. When the manager had begun to prepare for saying sorry to their angry clients and bearing heavy loss, an ordinary worker of the factory rescued him: the clever young fellow put an electric fan aside of their product line. The result is too simple to guess: all the empty boxes were blown away and only those with a soap inside can stay on the line.
感觉这段不是很贴切，和goals means worthiness 哪一个相关呢？没看出来

Nevertheless, it is a complex question that whether a goal is worthy or not and may get dissimilar explanations in different periods of history. We used to burn forest in order to plant more wheat, but now our authority is considering growing more trees on ploughs. Decades ago cars are the symbol of modern society in many peoples' eyes, however these vehicles are more likely to be connected with air pollutions, noises and traffic jams up-to-date. All of these experiences tell us that as today's meat may become poisons in the future, that’s why taking more factors into consideration is a necessity before we make the decision.
这一段是说不同历史时期，目标的价值不同。那到底要不要  do whatever it Justifies 至少也要带一句吧 或者说你上一段说明了问题是要取决于goals 然后具体来分析goal ps我是这样写的 有空可以看看

At last, sometimes our behaviors actually have a prominent effort on attaining the goal, but they may be harmful to someone else at the same time. Every responsible human being is not supposed to build his happiness on other's sadness. During the World War II, the American government finally decides to use the A-bomb to attack the fascistic Japan. Maybe the warfare had got an earlier ending for several months which means less expense on money and soldiers of the alliance constructed by US, UK, USSR and China, but an avalanche of innocent Japanese residents are still suffering from awful diseases caused by the strong radiation up to the present, and many of the scientists who used to help invent the A-bomb were therefore agonized by their conscience until depth.这里是death吧

To sum up, the answer of whether an aim is worthy or not is always changing as the time goes. On the other hand, a person who only consider about his own benefits is a selfish guy and can hardly reach real success.
最后一段感觉完全跑题 文章的topic是如果有价值的目标，就有不计一切代价去实现，而不是仅仅探讨价值是否随时间的变化而变化。例子很好，但逻辑不是很清晰。
我个人也有同样的问题，欢迎指正 1# nijiaqin

tracyrongyiUID: 2842378

It has long been controversial that any means of attaining a worthy goal is justifiable. The hot debate focus mainly on two key words, "worthy" and "any". In other words, people question what is a common and rational criterion of "worthy" other than personal judgement, and whether "any" measure can be taken regardless of tradional discipline, socail regulations and personal situations. Due to the complication of this issue, the assertion should be determined on a case-by-case basis.

To begin with, we are obliged to have a clear knowledge if what kind of a goal can be called a worthy goal. Only according with personal or a small group’s interests and persuits is far from the true essential of "worthy". I believe a worthy goal ought to be resonable and justicial, rational subjectively and correct objectively and answering for the tide of historical development and
fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of people who are surely the judges.感觉句子很不错 If so, any means taken for the goal deserves to be justifiable. Take World War Two for example. In 1945, in order to end the anti-fascist war and renew the order and peace of the world rapidly, America finally has to put two atomic bombs into use against Japan to force Japan to surrender immediately. Though the atomic bomb is always regarded as an immoral and devastating weapon, who knows how many years the fascist continues to commmit evils during which millions of lives will be killed without using the atomic bomb? So for such a goal to maintain the justice and peace of world, it’s justifiable for America pitching the atomic bomb.要想把pitching atomic bomb 说成reasonable 仅仅是从fascist这一面还是不够的，maybe there are some methiods not only anti-fascism but also avoid atomic bombs

Moreover, considering the goal for independence and freedom, we can perceive more insightful models. While some goals may be achieved at the expense of innocent people killed or maimed by unavoidable wars sometimes, I still believe that these efforts in reaching a goal are valuable. For instance, without such leaders as chairman Mao and Martin Luther King struggling for their ultimate ideals, China might still be the colonies of Japan and African Americans might remained to be relegated at the backs of buses. Even though they devote their lives to the career or sacrifice many other innocent people, the means of attaining these goals is worthy.

Notwithstanding the foregoing favors to the speaker’s assertion, I would be hard-pressed to consider the feasibility of means for any goal which is as worthy as what I define. Obviously, we can’t extend the example of America above to embrace all the situations. Can a government develop local ecomony without caring the damage to the environment? Will it be permitted that the manufacturers join in the unfair competitions and deceive customers for more profits? What do you think of cheating in examinations for students to get better academic performance? Their goals are originally right and worthy of being persued, but the means are not advocated, some of which are even against law. All these reveal that human activities should be under certain restrictions and control, on which part of the meanings of law lies. Accordingly, before we hastily make a decision which may be controversial, we should take into consideration the ethic standard we cherish and laws we must abide by.

In summary, the claim that if a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable can not be applied to every aspect of human endeavors. We humans should learn to judge the rationality, feasibility and worthiness of measures according to the value of ethics and laws.逻辑比较清楚 让我找到自己的一个逻辑不足 a
gap needs to be filled.但是例子的新颖程度还有待提高 欢迎去拍我的文章

2# leexiaoju

zryzh@qq.comUID: 2741041

In recent years, the topic of the methods to reach our goals is so hot that people varying from backgrounds as well as personalities tend to observe this same issue from diversified perspectives. A widely accepted viewpoint claims that any means should be allowed to be taken if the target is valuable. Although I'm not pleased with the feeling of being an critic, I would rather stand on the opposite of this point of view and reckon that to define whether a goal is worthy or a mean is justifiable is not so simple as it seems like.
（I individually prefer to like  a conclusion on an article foremost,    so I suggest to use this style, In other words, the  point of  view in each paragraph ought to appear within it）



First of all, I have to concede that as we are living in such a complicated society, some tasks may seem not able to be solved with traditional methods. In such occasions, we would find it hard to get a distinct progress without utilizing our creations. A story happened in a soap factory may serve as an appropriate example to strengthen my claim. A significant machine in that factory got something mistake which made that some of the soap boxes were failed to be filled in a soap. It would be a disaster to sell such "soaps" to customs, however all the engineers of the factory had tried their best and still can mend the machine thoroughly. When the manager had begun to prepare for saying sorry to their angry clients and bearing heavy loss, an ordinary worker of the factory rescued him: the clever young fellow put an electric fan aside of their product line. The result is too simple to guess: all the empty boxes were blown away and only those with a soap inside can stay on the line.
(Take this factory for example,  I used to look at  the example in other article, It is used to explain the relation between diploma and ability. If you want to explain your claim, I would to  say that  it is not the best example)
Nevertheless, it is a complex question that whether a goal is worthy or not and may get dissimilar explanations in different periods of history. We used to burn forest in order to plant more wheat, but now our authority is considering growing more trees on ploughs. Decades ago cars are the symbol of modern society in many peoples' eyes, however these vehicles are more likely to be connected with air pollutions, noises and traffic jams up-to-date. All of these experiences tell us that as today's meat may become poisons in the future, that’s why taking more factors into consideration is a necessity before we make the decision.   
( I do not understand  how you  think,  which  auto is  more convenience for  pelple to travel is taken for example is closely irrelative with your issue)