还有两天就考了，强烈求拍，让PP来的更猛烈些吧

jannethUID: 2769502

还有两天就考了，一休严重超时，都不知道要咋办了，没一次是按时写完的，考的时候写不完咋办啊～求解，顺带看看偶写的一休和阿狗吧，请教请教～

TOPIC: ISSUE143 - "Artists should pay little attention to their critics.* Criticism tends to undermine and constrain the artist's creativity."

*those who evaluate works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
WORDS: 625         TIME: 00:60:00         DATE: 2010-8-7 1:46:13

The speaker asserts that the criticism would be harmful to the creativity of art. It might be reasonable for the exceeding criticism sometimes. Nonetheless, the artists have a powerful and unconstrained style , when they create art, at this time ,the criticism play a significant role for the art and for the admirers.

There is no denying that the exaggerated criticism would have a tremendous pressure to the artists, and then affecting the creating. Every one is not a independent individual, no matter the artists or the ordinary citizens, all play a role in the society. And for this society, individuals have close relationship with each other, regardless your own desire, would be frequently affected by other people more or less. More than others, by the development of the technology, and the freedom of speech, more and more people express their opposite ideas by the internet, television, video, and so forth. Actually, some of the criticism and question, are not object or based on the practice, the individuals are only adapt this opportunity to take out their dissatisfaction, it is entirely possible that they have not known who he is, when they criticize the person together, this case is more serious for artists.

Art is a place fulling of unusual but wonderful thinking, it is not surprising that the individuals could not understand it or have distinguished viewpoints with the artists. When the artists are thick with the criticism and questioning, what will they consider? Admittedly, some of the artists will be themselves, in fact, most of the artists will be influenced by the criticism, or even changing their mind entirely to chase the agreement and losing themselves. For this kind of criticism would destroy the creativity of the arts. Losing the creativity and characters of the art will mean nothing.

Certainly, the criticism is not merely harmful and restrained to art, object and accurate criticism  also provide the motivation and flash blood to the article field At first, just imaging when the criticism disappears from the article field, how will the art get? It means there is no person really understand the art, only real understanding the critics have, they will give suggestion for the art,including the content, artifice, hue and so forth, at this time, the object criticism is equal with suggestion. With the criticism, the artists could recognize the limitation and flaw, and then correct them, it is the step of the development. The artists will have a improvement on the criticism.

The importance of the criticism is not limited to the art work, it could help ordinary citizens to understand the art. By the limiting of the knowledge, background, ideas, some of the citizens could not really understand the inner mind of the art work, for this matter, on the basis of the criticism and concrete analysis, the citizens could enjoy the art. The role of the critic sometimes like the commentator of basketball, when we watch the NBA, some commentators analyze the game for us to better watching and understanding, although they might criticize some teams or some players, but it bases on the practice, and help us to think what is the competition and how the players perform, this procedure could make us step into the basketball world, and the same to art. Enjoying is not equal with agreement, the correct criticism also improve the art and the artists and turn the admirers into inner mind.

Looking back the history, the object and accurate criticism improves the development frequently, not matter the article field or other academic field. Refusing the criticism primitively could not make the art better, for different artists and distinguished criticism, in my viewpoint, the artists could artist themselves while absorbing some reasonable and object criticism.

jannethUID: 2769502

这是阿狗，也超时15分钟，咋办啊，愁死了～
TOPIC: ARGUMENT191 - The following is a letter from a professor at Xanadu College to the college's president.
"The development of an extensive computer-based long-distance learning program will enhance the reputation of Xanadu College. This program would allow more students to enroll in our courses, thereby increasing our income from student tuition. Traditional courses could easily be adapted for distance learners, as was shown by the adaptation of two traditional courses for our distance learning trial project last year. Also, by using computer programs and taped lectures, faculty will have fewer classroom obligations and more time to engage in extensive research, thereby enhancing the reputation of Xanadu."
WORDS: 676          TIME: 00:30:00          DATE: 2010-8-7 15:53:10
In this letter, the writer claim that the development of an extensive computer based long distance learning program would enhance the reputation of the college. To support this conclusion, the writer cites several evidence, however, though the evidence seems logical, careful scrutiny of them reveals there are a train of logical flaws and reasoning problems as stand,so  I will discuss each them in turn。

The major problem with this letter is that the writer assumes the enrolling of the college would increase and then the income will increase beforehand based on  none substantiated evidence. At first, the writer overlooks whether the students prefer this learning program than going to school, if they do not like this style, the enrolling will no increase. As a result, the cost of the long distance learning program will not receive back and the income will not increase,or even decline. What is more, the writer fails to consider the another alternative that the students that studying at school will change their program to long distance learning, this changing would probably decrease the income, after all, the tradition program will cost more than this new system. For these cases, the writer could not simply assume the more income will be had by the new long distance learning program.

In addition, the writer cites a fact that two traditional courses have adapted for distance
learners to imply that the other traditional courses could be easily adapted for distance learners. This assumption is unsubstantiated and groundless, because the writer provide none information concerning the two adapted courses. Perhaps these two courses are easy to adapt, however, the other are not suit to adapt. At the same time, the writer fails to prove these two adapted courses are successful and popular among students, if the students do not like these adapting, this procedure will be meaningless. Without explaining these problems clearly, the writer could not persuade me that the traditional courses adapted for distance learners are successful and could be used for other courses.

Also, to better bolster the conclusion, the writer points out if the new computer programs could be used, the faculty will have more time and energy to research, and then enhancing the reputation of the college. This assumption is so absurd, the writer neglects that even the computer programs would cost less time for teachers to teach class, but the more important thing is whether the teachers would use the time to research, possibly teachers might use the time to do some private affairs, thereby the reputation of the college will not be enhanced. Furthermore, the writer ignores the effect of the computer programs, if the computer programs have little help to students, and capability of the students has not enhanced, the students and their parents will disappointed with this college, and this procedure will weaken the reputation of the college rather than enhancing. The writer could not simply assume that the reputation of the college would enhance by the less time spent to students instead of more time to research.

Despite the foregoing analysis, I will still emphasis that the goal of the college is to educate students and conduct them to have a successful future rather than enhancing income of college,if only want the college to have more money, the reputation will not be enhanced. Moreover, the reputation of the college is also including the capability of education, satisfaction of both the parents and students, and the social consequence, without considering these factors, the procedure used to enhancing the reputation of college will not be successful and accepted.

Finally, the conclusion of the letter is not well reasoned and persuasive. If the write want to better support this conclusion, he or she must provide us the information about the report of the attitude to this new compute programs. And the writer should make a further survey to the traditional courses adapted for this new distance learners. At last, before the writer draw the conclusion, he or she must consider every factors that would affect the reputation of college all sidedly.

jannethUID: 2769502

UP,UP~求解啊，疯了～

七星之城UID: 2784227

两天~一天两次，还有至少4次模考练习的机会吧。以后就是把时间压下来，严格限时，不能再超了；不然写不完就真糟糕。
你能够写600+的文章说明思路上是没有问题的，那么可以用剩下的时间来练习限时。我从能够写600+的ISSUE到限时也就用了两天，当然是放弃了一些东西，比如：现在只能450+或500+（取决于题目）；举例也没有时间举超过两个；有时候一些次要的扩展观点就不写了。 只能这么办，其实不很影响了。ARGU点只要三个就够，如果时间实在不行，就把首尾段套模板。祝你好运~

jannethUID: 2769502

谢谢了，今天模考了～疯了～不过阿狗总算不超了，呵呵，现在就在练一休，加油吧～
人不疯狂枉少年，呵呵～
下面是这会刚写的阿狗，哪位好心人有时间就给看看吧～
TOPIC: ARGUMENT221 - The following appeared in the editorial section of a student newspaper.
 
"In a recent survey, most students who were studying beginning Russian gave higher course-evaluation ratings to classes taught by non-native Russian speakers than to classes taught by native Russian speakers. The reason that the non-native speakers were better teachers of Russian is easy to see: the non-native speakers learned Russian later in life themselves, and so they have a better understanding of how the language can be taught effectively. Therefore, in order to improve instruction for all languages and also save money, our university should hire non-native speakers as language instructors instead of trying to find and recruit native speakers."
WORDS: 630          TIME: 00:30:00          DATE: 2010-8-8 21:00:23
 
In this argument, the arguer points out that the university should hire non native speakers rather than native speakers to teach the language, and to support this recommendation, the arguer cites several evidence appeared logical, however, within close analyzing the evidence, reveals so unsubstantiated and unsound as stand, for this matter, I will discuss each of the fallacies carefully in turn.
 
To begin with, the arguer cites a survey concerning the reflecting of the beginning Russian to the native Russian speakers and the non native speakers to imply that the non native speakers are better than the native speakers. At first glance, it seems reasonable, however, the arguer fails to convince me whether this result is happened  for the unfamiliar with the native speakers, or the students are lacking the capability to study Russian, and the disappointing for the Russian makes them to have this reflection. Moreover, the arguer provide none information to explain the concrete number of the students who have this reflection, perhaps it is only a special sample, and most of the new beginners are satisfied with the native speakers. And also , the reflection is only based on the beginning Russian, not including the middle and higher students, it is entirely possible that the others students are so satisfied with the native speakers. Without ruling out these alternatives, the arguer cannot draw the assumption that the non native speakers are better than the native speakers.
 
Additionally, the arguer also points out another evidence to reinforce his conclusion, the non native speakers have better understanding of measure to study Russian, because they  start learning Russian latter. Carefully analysis of this evidence finds the conclusion is so absurd. At first, just because the native speakers speak Russian early and as their mother language, they have a clear understanding of the language, involving the culture of the language, adaption of the language, speaking of the language, by studying with the native the students could learning language as native speaker, it is the benefit of learning with the native. Even the non native speakers have a deeply understanding of learning language, however, we are not sure with the accuracy of the understanding, perhaps it is only a fast measure for passing the examination, not really benefit for understanding the language. The arguer overlooks the  advantages of the learning  with native speakers, and make a groundless conclusion.
 
Last but not the least, the arguer recommends that in order to save money and improve the instruction, the university should employ the non native speakers rather than native speakers based on the foregoing unsound and unreasonable evidence. For this conclusion, we could find several flaws , firstly, whether the hiring  non native speakers could save money is still a question, no evidence to prove the native speakers cost more than native speakers. Secondly, even the foregoing evidence that for beginning Russian the non native speakers are better than native speakers, it is unwarranted for all languages to hire non native instead of native, after all, the other languages are different with Russian, just as we could not have the same measure for learning English and Japanese. For the analysis above, the arguer could recognize that the conclusion that hiring non native speakers instead of native speakers for all languages is not a wise decision.
 
In summary, the argument is unwarranted and unsound. If the arguer want to support this argument, he or she should provide the reflection of the other students, not only beginning Russian, still including the other levels students. For better evaluating the conclusion, we should also know the instructions of other languages. At last, I also want to give a suggestion that if the university want to improve the instruction, it should make a scientific survey for both students and teachers.
先谢过了～