shadowran的作文本

shadowranUID：2864083

9.2
独立
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:3 `: s+ ~2 b( b9 q9 t5 E( P9 X: o
　　It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds. (Government & Money)

shadowranUID：2864083

9.3 独立
Do you prefer to take a low-paid but secure job or a job with a high salary but easy to lose?

louisa427UID：2458920

楼主应该加强模版以外的句子语言和例子的运用，不得不说，你的模版不错

humiaokeUID：2896850

谢谢分享了，学习了








Everyone will wow gold love pass

shadowranUID：2864083

9.4 独立
公众需不需要为公共交通工具付钱

bearseuUID：2873933

替你改好了，欢迎交流

shadowranUID：2864083

9.6
独立

serena-blueUID：2811284

已经修改完毕

shadowranUID：2864083

9.7 独立

menglishuixiangUID：2875988

看了楼主的两篇独立作文，原来是遵循一定套路来的。结构不错，语言地道，有些小的语法错误吧。
我感觉总的来说不错了~~

menglishuixiangUID：2875988

同9.4作文题，我的作文本，共同交流
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The public need not pay for the public transport.

In the context of economic downturn, more and more people claim that the public need not pay for the public transport and the government should not charge them transportation fees. If that is the case, the public can have transportation service for free, for instance, they can have free bus, free train or subway; what’s more, they don’t have to pay the maintenance fees of highways every time they ride on them. It sounds like a Utopia to me. However, from their standpoints, it is the duty or obligation of government to provide such benefits to the public.
People who hold the above opinion may argue that we already pay taxes to government. Taxes mean we buy public service from the government. If we still need to pay for the pubic transport, it means we pay double fees. That’s unfair, of course. Also, in such a bad economic situation, unemployment rate is on the rise and people who have work get paid less than before. For the jobless and working class, it means that the expenditure on transport takes up much more of their income than ever before. Their life quality is certainly largely reduced.
Nevertheless, I can’t agree with their opinion or this argument, because if things went as those people expected, our society and government would bear a heavier burden, which is detrimental to both us in the end. As we all know, the government has to pay the daily expenditure on public transport such as oil, gas, labor, maintenance fees, etc. If it provides transport for free, what the result would be? It is likely that a large percentage of fiscal taxes will be paid on transport sector in the cost of other sectors, such as education, healthcare and so on. The government has no other option when carrying such a load.
So, the conclusion is at this moment our public needs to pay public transport. I believe this is the wise decision after considering the pons and cons.

shadowranUID：2864083

27# menglishuixiang
帮你改了~~

menglishuixiangUID：2875988

看到了，谢谢楼主~~你说的很对！我也加入进来，每天作文都要进步一点。
让我们一起努力，相互修改，共同进步~~ 28# shadowran

menglishuixiangUID：2875988

修改了~~总的来说，不错~~ 12# shadowran