松山雪影的综合作文

zcnvszwjUID: 2815734

TPO 3
In this lecture, the professor made three reliable points to support that the Portrait of Elderly Woman was definitely completed by Rembrandt, opposite to the reading's solution. The professor's statement, as she said, is just based on scientific study for several years, carrying out by some strict researchers.
To begin with, the professor casted doubt on the reading is its sentence that without insistent on wearing, the painting doesn't belong to Rembrandt since he couldn't make such primitive error. In fact, the luxurious fur collar was added on the painting, over one hundred years after the original painting's completion. Regardless of inconsistent between the white linen cap and the fur collar, someone did that to make the painting more valuable.
Another argument the professor used, contrary to the reading's words, is that the fur collar under the woman's face on the painting is light color cloth. It reflects sunshine instead of absorbing it, illuminating parts of the woman’s face. Therefore, the woman's face is not in partial shadow. Obliviously Rembrandt hasn't made a mistake on mastering painting light and shadow. That differs from what the reading says.
Furthermore, the reading announced that Rembrandt never used a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together, while the examination showed the painting was specifically finished through that method. However, the professor stated that Rembrandt also used this kind of panel because another self portrait by the same implement has been found. What's more, researchers have identified that the pieces of wood on the panel came from a same tree, creating a grand and valuable atmosphere to appreciator. This directly contradicts what the reading indicated.
第一篇综合写作，还望大家指教

dukenuneeUID: 2859326

已改好。

zcnvszwjUID: 2815734

9月10日
TPO 5
In the lecture, the professor lists three potent points opposite to the reading's statement. As the reading says, great houses in Chaco Canyon, New Mexico own three possible and competing functions, including resident house, food store and special ceremonial center, while the professor uses several evidences casting doubt on all of them.
Initially, the professor suspects that the Chaco structures were used to live hundreds of people per unit. Although they are similar to the well-known apartment building at Taos, New Mexico, purely residential nowadays, the two types of structures are just alike outside. Staying inside, you will find they are quite different. What's more, with numerous residents, there should be a lot of kitchens correspondingly in Chaco structure. However, every Chaco structure has few kitchens, able to support only ten persons at most.
Another point the professor claims, on the contrary of the reading's second theory, is excavation from archeologists. According to the reading, potentially Chaco structures were regarded as food store, especially for grain maize which can be long-lasting. In that case, the remains of maize or maize container should absolutely be found, but there isn't any such discovery. That differs from the reading.
Furthermore, the reading concludes that perhaps these ancient structures are centers holding inhabitants' ceremonial, such as Pueblo Alto, where large number of broken pots and an enormous mound were identified and thought to proof this conclusion. On contrary, the professor believes the unusual mound has nothing to do with ceremonials since they could be held in other place, as well as the broken pots, in regular use instead of festive meals in ceremonial. This directly contradicts what the reading passage indicates.

kimi海纳UID: 2855420

找不到你的独立作文，就发到这里啦~