阿波罗作文

chxh2020UID: 2587109

求严厉拍

chxh2020UID: 2587109

2009.9.11NA   do you agree or disagree it is only worth watching movies that can teach us something about real life.
Although the statement about watching movies to learn real life ostensibly is meaningfull looking at the first glance, after being scrutinized for a while, you will find which is lack of logic and full of drawbacks. So I am totally disagree with that statement.
First of all, there are lots of ways to learn something about real life, watching movies is only the little friction part of those means. Indeed, watching movies can do some contribution to this kind of issue, but I think the most important way is try to join in the life to feel your own experience. Only in this way we can learn the real life more deep and develop our own perspective toward the life. There is an old saying goes like this: you can never grasp the skill of swim if you never jump into the water even you watch the way to swim everyday. So it is not worth watching movies if you just want to learn something about real life. Join in the society and communicate with others from every occupation everyday will teach you everything about real life.
However, watching movies can tell us copious of things instead of real life. There are amounts kinds of movies in the market which targets to different purpose. Such as science fiction movies, entertaining movies, educational movies and so on, teach us something about real life is only certain kind of movies' aim. Taking the science fiction movies as an example, the purpose of which is not tell you something about real life, instead which tell you something about future. Always watching science fiction movies could inspire our imagination, which will be very helpful for us to deal with our daily problem innovatively. Another example is the entertaining movies, the single goal of which is to please the audience, making them laugh or relax and forget the anxiety, frustration in our daily life. I bet it is quite worth watching the entertaining movies to reinforce yourself when you are tired.
To summarize these points I have mentioned above, I am totally disagree with the statement that watching movies to teach us real life.

妄北EchoUID: 2854157

Although the statement about watching movies to learn real life ostensibly is meaningfull looking at the first glance, after being scrutinized for a while, you will find which(这里用which不恰当，不知道在指代谁,直接用the statement) is lack of logic and full of drawbacks. So I am totally disagree with that statement.3 V0 |2 M) j& i& A7 @  I$ k

First of all, there are lots of ways to learn something about real life, watching movies is only the little(a small) friction part(用fiction就不要用part) of those means. Indeed, watching movies can do some contribution to this kind of issue, but I think the most important way is to try to join in the life to feel your own experience. Only in this way we can learn the real life more deep and develop our own perspective toward the life. There is an old saying goes like this: you can never grasp the skill of swim if you never jump into the water even you watch the way to swim everyday. So it is not worth watching movies if you just want to learn something about real life. Joining in the society and communicating with others from every occupation everyday will teach you everything about real life.

However, watching movies can tell us copious of things instead of real life. There are amounts kinds of movies in the market which targets to different purposes. Such as science fiction movies, entertaining movies, educational movies and so on, (这里是不是要另其一句话？逗号不能连接两个句子)to teach us something about real life is only certain kind of movies' aim. Taking the science fiction movies as an example, the purpose of which(it) is not to tell you something about real life, instead which(这里好奇怪啊) tell you something about future. Always watching science fiction movies could inspire our imagination, which will be very helpful for us to deal with our daily problem innovatively(这里写的不错，我还挺稀罕). Another example is the entertaining movies, the single goal of which(which不应该这么用的，用it) is to please the audience, making them laugh or relax and forget the anxiety, frustration in our daily life. I bet it is quite worth watching the entertaining movies to reinforce yourself when you are tired.

To summarize these points I have mentioned above, I am totally disagree with the statement that watching movies to teach us real life.

题目说agree or disagree it is only worth watching movies that can teach us something about real life.意思是是不是那些能教我们真实生活中东西的电影才值得一看。
楼主整篇都在说其他的方式能教我们生活中的知识。
共勉，加油

流淌在海德堡UID: 2619542

3# 妄北Echo
我觉得我的有别的问题。能麻烦帮我也看一下吗？
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1151893-1-1.html 一楼 流淌在海德堡

流淌在海德堡UID: 2619542

2# chxh2020
我也觉得有点跑题。还是应该围绕MOVIES ABOUT REAL LIFE 和NOT ABOUT REAL LIFE 是否WORTH WATCHING这一主题。

shufescUID: 2616499

个人意见，仅供参考~~

chxh2020UID: 2587109

2009.9.19 NA  Government should more support art museum and music performance than recreational facilities, such as swimming pool or play ground.6 h9 `5 V' P
Whether or not government should support art museum and music performance more than recreational facilities such as swimming pool or play ground is a fierce controversial issue debated for a long time. Some person who agree with the statement this art museum and music performance plays a more significant role in our spirit horizon, however, other person who disagree with the perspective, point out that swimming pool or play ground contribute more in our physical condition. As for me, though I am not a sport fantastic, I am totally disagree with the statement.
The notion that art museum and music performance established a very important role in our daily life is concept by everyone. After doing a whole day long work, we feel very tired and under full-pressure, however, listening to a beautiful music or watching a music performance or an elegant artifact will make us relax and forget that boring things. Moreover, visiting the art museum or appreciating the music performance frequently can inspire our spirit imagination, which will not only increase our knowledge and broaden our horizon but also help us deal with our daily problem innovatively. So government should support art museum and music performance and other kind of facilities which will benefit spirit and knowledge to society.
Though the government should support to art museum and music performance, the government should support to swimming pool or play ground, either.
First of all, because the modern society is full of pressure that it is quite difficult to live in it at ease, so we have to find our own way to release that horrible pressure. Different people have very different habits to get relieve. Some person will choose the art museum or music performance we have discussed above, while some people probably will choose play ground or swimming pool. Hence, these recreational facilities can give that people quite a good place to relax themselves. So the government should respect these people's right to relax in their own habits.
What's more, these facilities like swimming pool or play ground are not just of recreational function, on the same time, these facilities will strengthen our human body and make us stronger. One of our Chinese proverbs goes quite well: "life due to sports". Building more sport facilities like swimming pool or play ground will provide more chance for society to join in the sports, that will be benefit the society physically a lot.
Moreover, these facilities still can give us a lesson in spiritual way. Since we have established lots of sports competition, like National basketball union, Olympic and so on, though these sports competition we can learn sorts of spiritual things, such as never give up, cooperating with your teammates to win the game, trust your teammates and others. Besides we can make lots of friends through these sports on the play ground.
To sum up, there is no reason for government to support less to recreational facilities such as swimming pool or play ground.

chxh2020UID: 2587109

09.9 25NA do you agree or disagree: having jobs with low paying salary and being high secure is better than jobs with high salary but being easy to lost.

Which job is better, jobs with low paying salary but being high secure, or jobs with high salary but being easy to lost? This controversial issue has being debated for a long time, especially in the graduating time for these students. Some person think taking the job with low salary but with high security is better because they need the feeling of security even though the salary is low. However, other person claim that taking jobs with high salary is better because they have confidence to maintain that job, and even when they are fired, they can find a job without efforts. As for me, I belong to the second group because I think the perspective of the first group could undermine both company and individual. So, In my view, it's better to have a job with salary though being easy to lost.
First of all, providing jobs with low salary but with high security for person is harmful to company. The main goal of the company is to earn as much profit as possibly, however, this payment system can not achieve this aim. Virtually every person is inclined to do less work and earn more money. Since the company pays his workers little money, at the same time, they are sure that they can not be fired for any reasons, they will not try their best to work to accomplish the goal of the company. Mutually, the profit of the company will be cut down, and the company will be affected negatively even bankrupt ultimately.
At the same time, getting jobs with low salary but with high security destroy the comfortable life condition and the promise to have a splendid life. I think the main purpose of every person is trying to achieve an attractive future when we are young, and have a glorious history when we are old. The high secure but low salary job will kill your inclination to fight for your beautiful future, because you don't need to force yourself to try your best to fulfill something, just to get the salary every month without any consideration and enjoy the common and dull life.
On the contrary, jobs with high salary but being easy to lost will benefit both company and individual. Since the goal of the company is to earn as much profit as possible, and the aim of person is have a colorful and meaningful life, the purpose of both parts can come true if they work together with every effort. As a worker, you have to work hard and improve your professional skill to get more salary, if not, you will lose the job. This competition force the worker to work hard to make more profit for the company, and mutually the company will pay more money for his worker to improve their living condition. In the end, you will turn to be a skillful worker and the company will not work functionally without you.
To sum up, taking a job with high salary and high risk to lose will benefit both the company and individual while taking a job with low salary and low risk to lose will destroy them both instead. So I think jobs with high salary but being easy to lose is better for these reasons I have mentioned above.

chxh2020UID: 2587109

09. 10. 17 NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and televisions should always show audience good people are being rewarded and bad people are being punished.

Ostensibly, this statement that movies and television should always show audience good people are being rewarded and bad people are being punished is meaningfull and positive to audience, because of the function in educating person in society. However, the statement using the word "always" in the sentence, which means the genre of all these movies and televisions should follow that kind of style, therefore, I am disagree with the statement.
The notion of educating audience that good people are being rewarded and bad people are being punished through movies and televisions is undeniable, because that kind of programs in deed affect our spiritual horizon through give the audience the impression that good or bad person will be rewarded or punished ultimately. That kind of programs encourage people in the society to do good thing and try to be behave as a good man, and in the same time, threaten some person who is incline to do something bad to others or the society will be punished in the end that nobody dare to be a bad people. So, in the way, this kind of programs is necessary in the movies or television market.
However, if all the movies and televisions are in that kinds of style, the audience will be so familiar with the spot of movies or televisions that there will be little and little audience who want to watch them. Besides, our society needs various genre of program which will benefit our spiritual condition in different ways. For instance, the science fiction movies, there will be no good man or bad man, just what will happen in the future. Still, that kind of movies is functional to improve our imagination which is very helpfull for us to deal with our daily problem innovatively. Other examples, the love movies, affecting our love attitude toward our future mate, war movies, spiritualizing our patriotism to our country, entertainment movies, just relaxing our brain, and so on, all style of movies and television is a significant component in the movies market and play the unsubstitutable role on our society.
To sum up, I am disagree with the statement that movies and televisions should always show audience good people are being rewarded and bad people are being punished, because of these reasons I have talked above.

芒果yayaUID: 2759930

个人意见 供参考

dailiangzhenUID: 2679058

你的作文语法严谨，单词词语用的多，行文流畅。我想拿过去作范文了。
再接再厉，共同进步。:lol

chxh2020UID: 2587109

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sports teach people lessons about life

I am totally agree with the statement that sports teach us lessons though I am not a sports fantastic, because of both physical and spiritual benefits to human beings.
First of all, sports teach us that sports can strengthen our bodies and make us more healthy. At this point, I think it is very easy to draw this conclusion since there are not only proverbs, like "life due to sports", "one hours sports everyday make you live longer", but also examples to illustrate the significance of sports. For instance, statistics has show that person who are lacking of sports are more incline to get sick frequently than person who insist on sports several times one week.
Secondly, sports can teach us lots of spiritual things, such as "if you want to win, never give up", "if you want to succeed, try to be patient", "if you want to accomplish your goal, try to be industrious" and so on. For example, a basketball player, trying to be a professional basketball player playing in NBA, is almost the final goal for every basketball player. The road to achieve this aim is full of exercise, sweat, and even blood. He have to industrious enough, patient enough and insist on the goal, even though, he only have chance to fulfill his goal, but if he lack of these character, he will never succeed.
The last but not least, sports teach us tactic to game which is useful in the life either. In the competitive sports, like football and basketball, if one team want to win the game, it's necessary to use some strategies. Familiar with other team's advantage and disadvantage will be very helpful for one team to win the game, because that team will layout tactic focus on other team's shortcomings and avoid their sharp points. That is similar with the commercial society, where one company want to extend and defend against other companies.

To sum up, sports in deed can teach us lessons in life for some aspects. However, the ways that sports teach us lessons are not limited in these aspects I have talked above, sports can teach us in various ways.

ss33UID: 2624516

08.12.05NA
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sports teach people lessons about life

I am totally agree with the statement that sports teach us lessons though I am not a sports fantastic(fan), because of(because) both physical and spiritual healthy that sports brought benefits(benefit) to human beings.
First of all, sports teach us that(删掉) sports can strengthen our bodies and make us more (删)healthy. At this point, I think it is very easy to draw this conclusion since there are not only proverbs, like "life due to sports（? 无谓语）", "one hours（hour） sports everyday make you live longer", but also examples to illustrate the significance of sports（句子不连贯）. For instance, statistics has show that person(people) who are lacking of sports(lack exercises) are more incline to get sick frequently than person(those) who(删掉) insist on sports several times one week.
Secondly, sports can teach us lots of spiritual things, such as "if you want to win, never give up", "if you want to succeed(to be succeed), try to be patient", "if you want to accomplish your goal, try to be industrious" and so on. For example, a basketball player, trying to be a professional basketball player playing in NBA, is almost the final goal for every basketball player. (As for basketball players, being competitors in NBA turns out to be their ultimate goal) The road to achieve this aim is full of exercise, sweat, and even blood(好血腥). He have（has） to （be）industrious enough, patient enough and insist（s） on the goal, even though, he only have（has） chance to fulfill his goal, but if he lack of these character, he will never succeed.（这句太长了）
The last but not least, sports teach us tactic to game which is useful in the life either. In the competitive sports, like football and basketball, if one team want to win the game, it's necessary to use some strategies. Familiar with other team's advantage and disadvantage will be very helpful for one team to win the game, because that team will layout tactic focus on other team's shortcomings and avoid their sharp points. That is similar with the commercial society, where one company want to extend and defend against other companies.  
To sum up, sports in deed can teach us lessons in life for some aspects. However, the ways that sports teach us lessons are not limited in these aspects I have talked above, sports can teach us in various ways.
1．        很多单复数都不对，可见楼主写文章不用心啊！
2．        Chinglish很多，有些句子太长，建议楼主多去看一些范文
3．        文章字数太少，the longer, the better

chxh2020UID: 2587109

09.05.30NA
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Younger school children (ages five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math, science, history and language.

Whether younger children should be required to study art and music in addition to math, science, history and language or not, is a controversial issue debated for a long time and there is still no perfect answer for this statement. Some people agree with the statement, because of the benefits after study these courses, while some people disagree with the statement, because different children have different hobbies. As for me, I belong to the second group. I disagree with the following statement.
The consensus of the function of art and music is accepted by every people. Listening to a splendid music or appreciating a masterpiece of painting is a good way for us to release our brain. Because there is so much anxiety coming from our daily works that we have to find our method to relax ourselves, on the meanwhile, art and music solved this problem. Besides, studying art and music can broaden our horizon toward the beautiful stuff, improve our aesthetic ability, help us to find the elegant things in our surrounding, make our lives more colorful. Furthermore, studying art and music can improve our imagination and let free or our ideas, which is very helpful for us to deal with our daily problems innovatively. In that sense, almost all parents think it's very helpful for younger children to study art and music, and even some school administrators think so.
However, everything has two folds. Pursuing something on purpose, the result will go far away on the contrary. Requiring younger school children to study art and music, sometimes it's a burden to them, especially when they have so many courses need to learn, like math, science, history and language. Some people's food may be other people's poison. Perhaps a group of children have talent to that art or music, but not all of them have, because not everyone wants to be an artist or musician. We should not transfer our willing to their body and force them to learn that kind course which they maybe not interested in at all. If we insist on that, the result will be the opposite. In my opinion, these courses should not be obligatory, but optional instead. In this way, children who are interested in the art or music have a good chance to meet their hobbies, on the meantime, these courses can no become the other group of children's burden.
To sum up, though learning art and music can benefit modern human being in different ways, we can not transfer our willing to younger school children, and require all children to learn art and music, because to a group of children, who are not interested in music and art at all, that is just a burden to them. If the art and music course is just optional, everything will be solved.

chxh2020UID: 2587109

09.04.03NA
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers' salaries.

How to improve the quality of education and which way is best is a long debated issue which still not reach to the consensus. There are various methods to improve the quality of education, such as increase teacher's salaries, reduce students' financial pressure, improve school's teaching equipment or improve the teaching method. Which way is best? There is still no answer. Hence, I am totally disagree with the statement that increase teacher's salaries is the best way to improve the education quality, because of reasons I discussed in the following.
First of all, increasing teacher's salaries is method always used by some school or university to facilitate the improvement of education quality. Teachers can focus on the teaching and try their best to improve method to be best understood by students, and they don't need to worry about their living condition if there is not financial anxiety in their daily lives. So the education quality will improve a lot. However, not everything goes like this. Some teacher who get high salary still not contribute his or her effort on teaching, and just because of the high salary, he or her is so satisfied that there is not teaching method or contend improvement at all. In this case, the high salary is harmful to improve the education quality, not facilitate.
Secondly, instead of increasing teachers' salaries, prizing teachers' efforts financially is a better way to improve the education quality. Some teachers, who have made a big improvement in their teaching method or have contributed a lot to their students and their students' academic performance has changed a big step, should be prized with money. On the same time, other teachers who just do their ordinary work will not get the prize. In this way, every teacher has been motivated to improve the educational quality, which benefit to teachers, students and the whole society.
Finally, there are a lot of ways to improve the quality of education. For example, reducing students' financial pressure is effective way to improve the education quality. Even teachers have try their best to their occupation, because of the financial pressure, like save money to pay for the tuition or living cost, students can not pay attention to school courses. As a result, the quality of education is not improved. If these students have no financial pressure, they could absorb in these books the whole day. Consequently, the education is improved. Another example, improving school's teaching equipment can enhance education quality either. Previously, teachers always using chalk write on the blackboard, and the process of writing is slowly. Nowadays, every class is equipment with projection screen. In this way, every thing can be done before class using computer, and during class, teacher can focus on the content of the course. So it is very effective and can save a lot of time.
To sum up, because there are lots of methods to improve the quality of education, and increasing teachers' salaries is only a single method, which still has drawback, it's not safe to say that the best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teacher's salaries. In my viewpoint, prizing teachers' efforts financially is a better way to improve the education quality compare with increase teachers' salaries, and other methods, such as reducing students' financial pressure, improving school's teaching equipment, are effective either.