第一篇argument，求猛拍，另寻11月aw兄弟一起备考

albert199010UID: 2726886

第一篇argument，求猛拍，另寻11月aw兄弟一起备考，有意者加QQ345481875 注明gre aw


TOPIC: ARGUMENT147 - The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine.


In the argument the author concludes that the sales of Whirlwind video games (WVG) are going to increase. In order to support this, the author gives us some evidences which, I think, are not convincing.
First, in the argument the author says that video games players prefer lifelike graphics games which require the newest computers and the WVG has introduced several ones. However, the author fails to consider how many players can afford the newest computers. It is possible that the players like this kind of games but can not afford the computers and the sales of WVG will not increase. So without offering us enough evidence that the players can afford the newest computers, we can not believe the increase.
Second, even if the players can afford the computers, the argument is still not convincing because the author overlooks the competence from other video games companies. As we all now, all business like to invest in the fields that can return better interests and maybe there will be a lot of video games companies join the lifelike graphics video games market. So just as the author says, the lifelike graphics video games is the new fashion now, why not there will be other companies that threaten the sales of WVG?
Third, the WVG hold an advertising campaign directed at people aged from 10 to 25. But the author doesn't tell us that these people will prefer the lifelike graphics games because there is no evidence shows that the survey was conducted among people between 10 to 25. It is very possible that the survey was conducted mainly among people older than 25 and the advertising is useless. Without ruling out this possibility, we can not be sure that the advertising is going to help increase sales of WVG.
Finally, even if we assume the advertising is going to work and people aged from 10 to 25 prefer WVG's games, it is still unfair to say the sales are going to increase dramatically in the next few months. It is common knowledge that the sales of a company are greatly influenced by the management and sale skills of the company. In the argument, the author doesn't provide any evidences show that WVG has good management and the salesmen and saleswomen are good at saling. So we still can not accept the argument without enough evidences.
In conclusion, the argument is not convincing unless the author offer us more evidences, such as (1) the players can afford the computers; (2) the WVG is sure to win the competence because of the successful management and advertising; (3) a much more convincing survey shows that people aged from 10 to 25 prefer the lifelike graphics games.

albert199010UID: 2726886

留链必回拍，谢谢啊

nofeelings811UID: 2388638

TOPIC: ARGUMENT147 - The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine.

In the argument the author concludes that the sales of Whirlwind video games (WVG) are going to increase. In order to support this, the author gives us some evidences which, I think, are not convincing.
First, in the argument the author says that video games players prefer lifelike graphics games which require the newest computers and the WVG has introduced several ones. However, the author fails to consider how many players can afford the newest computers. It is possible that the players like this kind of games but can not afford the computers and the sales of WVG will not increase. So without offering us enough evidence that the players can afford the newest computers, we can not believe the increase.
Second, even if the players can afford the computers, the argument is still not convincing because the author overlooks the competence from other video games companies. （进行让步要有足够的理由让步，这个逻辑足以让步）As we all now, all business like to invest in the fields that can return better interests and maybe there will be a lot of video games companies join the lifelike graphics video games market. So just as the author says, the lifelike graphics video games is the new fashion now, why not there will be other companies that threaten the sales of WVG（1.问句加强语气.2.以子之矛攻子之盾）?
Third, the WVG hold an advertising campaign directed at people aged from 10 to 25.（准确的攻击了调查的不准确性，调查并没有说明调查对象的年龄） But the author doesn't tell us that these people will prefer the lifelike graphics games because there is no evidence shows that the survey was conducted among people between 10 to 25. It is very possible that the survey was conducted mainly among people older than 25 and the advertising is useless. Without ruling out this possibility, we can not be sure that the advertising is going to help increase sales of WVG.
Finally, even if we assume the advertising is going to work and people aged from 10 to 25 prefer WVG's games,（我认为10~25岁不一定喜欢video-games应作为广告有效的论据，所以我认为后半句应删掉） it is still unfair to say the sales are going to increase dramatically in the next few months. It is common knowledge that the sales of a company are greatly influenced by the management and sale skills of the company. In the argument, the author doesn't provide any evidences show that WVG has good management and the salesmen and saleswomen are good at saling（selling）. So we still can not accept the argument without enough evidences.
In conclusion, the argument is not convincing unless the author offer us more evidences, such as (1) the players can afford the computers; (2) the WVG is sure to win the competence because of the successful management and advertising; (3) a much more convincing survey shows that people aged from 10 to 25 prefer the lifelike graphics games.（和正文的逻辑顺序略有不同，但是我认为是个很好的总结，也许广告不一定有效还可以作为不一定有竞争力的论据？）
蓝色为我需要学习的地方
攻击顺序分析
人们不一定能买得起游戏所需的电脑——>
即便买得起，也不一定会有竞争力
广告不一定有效——>
没有管理和营销的保障，销量也不一定增加
我认为这是非常好的逻辑顺序，没有一味的让步，没有对调查的过多的批判。
也许逻辑顺序可以略加修改：
人们不一定能买得起游戏所需的电脑——>
即便买得起，也不一定会有竞争力     （1广告不一定有效
2没有管理和营销的保障，销量也不一定增加）

nofeelings811UID: 2388638

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1158338&extra=

huangcan01UID: 2831310

我11月5号机考~ 不知道楼主是11月具体什么时候

albert199010UID: 2726886

6# huangcan01
我11.23考