寄托天下
查看: 1094|回复: 1

[a习作temp] 南南北北的ARGU提纲 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
360
注册时间
2010-4-24
精华
0
帖子
15
发表于 2010-10-1 13:17:20 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 moonandwind604 于 2010-10-1 19:47 编辑

222. The following article appeared in a recent issue of a college newspaper. “Among all students who graduated from Hooper University over the past five years, more physical science majors than social science majors found permanent jobs within a year of graduation. In a survey of recent Hooper University graduates, most physical science majors said they believed that the prestige of Hooper University's physical science programs helped them significantly in finding a job. In contrast, social science majors who found permanent employment attributed their success to their own personal initiative. Therefore, to ensure that social science majors find permanent jobs, Hooper University should offer additional social science courses and hire several new faculty members who already have national reputations in the social sciences."

1、攻击调查,样本的大小未知。样本的代表性未知。
2、即便调查结果有效,并不能由此得出Hooper University目前的社会学系不好或社会学系的学生不好找工作。首先毕业生的看法是主观的。其次,有可能理科学生本身综合素质比较高。此外,毕业后一年里是否找到终生工作不能说明问题,社会学科可能更需要工作经验。再者,可能提供给理科学生比社会学生的工作职位多。·
3、即便Hooper University目前的社会学系真的不好,多提供课程和找新的有名望的老师也不能保证更多的社会学系的学生能找到终身职业。课程的提供不一定就能提升学科水平。如果原本课程已足够,这样反而会增加学生负担,造成学习效果下降。有名望的老师也不能保证学生的素质一定能提高,更不用说找终身职业了。

使用道具 举报

RE: 南南北北的ARGU提纲 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
南南北北的ARGU提纲
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1163266-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部