寄托天下
查看: 2670|回复: 6

[数学] 问道03的题 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
10
寄托币
184
注册时间
2008-10-10
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2010-11-12 14:03:18 |显示全部楼层
我觉得这题只有第二个选项是正确的。
Let  fn(x)=2xn^{2}exp{-n^{2}x^{2}} defined on [0,1], then fn(x)->f(x)=0 for all x in [0,1], as n->\infinity.
Then F(x)=0,  Fn(x)=(1-exp{-n^{2}x^{2}})->1 as n->\infinity, thus, Fn!->F.
已有 1 人评分寄托币 声望 收起 理由
sunwei0 + 10 + 3 谢谢分享

总评分: 寄托币 + 10  声望 + 3   查看全部投币

50 字节以内
不支持自定义 Discuz! 代码

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
10
寄托币
488
注册时间
2009-5-10
精华
0
帖子
5
发表于 2010-11-12 18:45:27 |显示全部楼层
Hi! I don't know whether it's just your typing error, but if not, the first statement's absolutely false, since you can always add any constant to the infinite integrals F_n and F then the finite integral of them will vary largely and the equality can never be told for sure.

Again, I guess you mean F'_n goes to f instead of being equal to each other as you type, in the second statement. Right, it's true. A function can determine it's derivative --- none or unique --- but has a family of arbitrary infinite integrals.

As for the final one, based on the same notation, you can find a specific example to illustrate it (as we usually love to do when in high school). Let f_n = x ^ (-n), write down the expression for integral(0,x,f_n) then you'll find it does not even converge at x=1.
已有 1 人评分寄托币 声望 收起 理由
sunwei0 + 10 + 2 谢谢分享

总评分: 寄托币 + 10  声望 + 2   查看全部投币

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
10
寄托币
488
注册时间
2009-5-10
精华
0
帖子
5
发表于 2010-11-12 18:46:31 |显示全部楼层
Sorry I forgot to give the conclusion just now:  Only the second statement is true.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
10
寄托币
488
注册时间
2009-5-10
精华
0
帖子
5
发表于 2010-11-12 18:46:44 |显示全部楼层
Hi! I don't know whether it's just your typing error, but if not, the first statement's absolutely false, since you can always add any constant to the infinite integrals F_n and F then the finite integral of them will vary largely and the equality can never be told for sure.

Again, I guess you mean F'_n goes to f instead of being equal to each other as you type, in the second statement. Right, it's true. A function can determine it's derivative --- none or unique --- but has a family of arbitrary infinite integrals.

As for the final one, based on the same notation, you can find a specific example to illustrate it (as we usually love to do when in high school). Let f_n = x ^ (-n), write down the expression for integral(0,x,f_n) then you'll find it does not even converge at x=1.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
6
寄托币
263
注册时间
2009-7-13
精华
0
帖子
1
发表于 2010-11-12 21:59:17 |显示全部楼层
6# zhunshang 请仔细看下一致收敛是什么意思:sup|fn(x)-f(x)|->0,你那个函数fn(x)在x=1/n点->Inf,它的极限函数在x=0根本不可能等于0,反例不成立

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
6
寄托币
263
注册时间
2009-7-13
精华
0
帖子
1
发表于 2010-11-12 22:07:31 |显示全部楼层
9# cobyss 你提的问题是对的,毕竟看的是回忆题,没那么精确。比如我们都知道sinx原函数是cosx,不用加什么常数。
至于后面那个问题,x^(-n)在[0,1]上根本就没有极限函数,x=0那点没法定义。
已有 1 人评分寄托币 声望 收起 理由
sunwei0 + 8 + 2 谢谢分享

总评分: 寄托币 + 8  声望 + 2   查看全部投币

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
10
寄托币
184
注册时间
2008-10-10
精华
0
帖子
3
发表于 2010-11-13 14:12:39 |显示全部楼层
10# fishingalone 请楼主重新看一下我给出的反例函数, 还有题目里说的是fn点点收敛到f, 好像跟一致收敛没关系吧
50 字节以内
不支持自定义 Discuz! 代码

使用道具 举报

RE: 问道03的题 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
问道03的题
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1171987-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部