- 最后登录
- 2010-12-1
- 在线时间
- 4 小时
- 寄托币
- 30
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-1
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 18
- UID
- 2944431

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 30
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-1
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
刚加入进来,不晓得怎么上传文档。。只能先贴在下面了,呵呵~~拜托大家帮我改改了~~
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
To achieve successful development of a country, a government should focus its budget more on young children’s education rather than on universities.
In this highly competitive world, how to obtain successful development of a country has become one of the most heated topics in 21st century. We all agree that one of the most important factors is education. However, there is still hot debate over how to assign the budget between primary education for children and senior education for university students. From my perspective, a government should put more funds in universities, instead of education of young children. Here I will reason my statement with concrete evidence as follows.
Indubitably, I concede the crucial role that primary education plays in today’s world. People may argue that it is a guarantee of basic education for the majority of one country’s dwellers, and also deserves certain amount of financial support. But commonly, elementary schools do not need excessive complicated facilities and professors with top academic backgrounds. Hence it is not a wise decision to use too much money to develop their learning conditions. Compared with elementary schools or middle schools, university students do not only need many advanced instruments to assist their study, but also a group of professional people to conduct their further study. Only in this way, can the students have good environment to continue their science research. Therefore, students in college need more funds than children in schools.
Besides, there is no way around the fact that universities contribute enormously to one country’s science research and technology development. Universities enable a myriad of scientists, engineers, and other professionals to do their studies and experiments. Their science reports and achievements may magnificently improve one country’s technology competence, which is an indicator of comprehensive development. What is more, the students under these people’s guidance probably will become tomorrow’s scientific giants. This again adds up the significance of university education. It explains why one responsible government should focus its budget more on senior education, rather than initial studies of children.
Another reason is that primary education also enjoys the economic benefit from the decision when we view it from a different perspective. For one thing, if we put aside more money for university’s operation, there will be greater possibility that universities spawn more scientific achievements. By trading these patents and intangible assets, the country can obtain more funds, which again can be allocated to primary education in the future. Consequently, it will be a win-win decision if we currently focus more money on universities.
Above all, it is safe to draw the conclusion that a wise government should pay more attention to high level education rather to initial education for children when it confronts the demand of one country’s development. Though we should not neglect the importance of young children’s learning environment, the merits of perfecting universities, such as its research potential and economic benefit, apparently weigh more.
|
|