- 最后登录
- 2011-4-27
- 在线时间
- 38 小时
- 寄托币
- 45
- 声望
- 2
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-23
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 32
- UID
- 2961437

- 声望
- 2
- 寄托币
- 45
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-23
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
1# lina.inverce
Throughout history mankind has strived tomake his life easier and better, in which process he has achieved much success.Whether it be technology, science or social generalization, each generationmade one unique and influential contribution. It can be argued, however, thatit is more difficult for human to be successful than before, for he takes toomuch equipment some of which might be useless, and even deleterious, whenclimbing scientific mountains.- g0 M {:i3 P4 e. [
8 K0 K& }&|4 G* n; r
We have more assistance from forerunners’ advancements nowadays, but we areless fruitful than them, because we trust authorities too much. I see it occurin our daily lives now and then. When we try to figure out a mathematicalquestion, most of us prefer to rely on calculators instead of our minds andpens. Once we find an answer differ from Answer Key, we are often convinced theanswer is wrong but doubt the Key rarely. After we accomplish it, we neverreturn back to wonder whether there is another way to work it out. Theseactions make us machines that can work out problems on paper only, and we arelosing our capabilities of creatively speculating. A celebrated scholar used toask why no more celebrities, say, Francis Bacon and Da Vinci, emerged recently,and he answered himself with irony—this is because people lived in that era didnot(这里我孤陋了,总觉得加个have通) so many books to read. Albeit ourancestors have striking creativity, we seem to lose it due to undue reliance ontheir inventors, which means we may be unlikely to succeed like them.
* {- d U1 D$ b/ n+ K$ U% g2s9 ~
4 Z b. d% g, M0 A8 JAdmittedly,contemporary scientists have made many astonishing discoveries and inventions,but many of them can not be defined as successes. Clone is a compelling exampleto illustrate my perspective. First, it compromises the definition ofindividual. A clone has the same genes as the matrix, so it will grow into thesame one as the matrix theoretically, from external to internal. (externalto internal这个有争议吧。。。external说得过去,internal就略有偏颇了,这句话多余了,在我看来)Thisbreaks the natural principle that every life is unique. Second, clones may betreated as seconds, which is another serous consequence. It challenges thehuman principle that all men are created equal. Third, according to the currentresearches, cloning technique is still not stable and clones have morepossibilities to vary, which may trigger a devastating disaster. Even thoughcloning technique is amazing, it is not a success but a two-sided sword.Therefore, Dr. Wilmot, who created Dolly, can not be regarded as a successfulperson. (结尾可以在深一点,毕竟这个段落clones是个例子,还是要同主旨点一点吧)
- p" X3 M, C% O3 t- J! n% X$ G, g0 }5 W5 j
In a nutshell, it is harder for us to succeed in this day and age than in (the) past. One can createsomething original and unprecedented, yet he may not be considered successfulbecause this discovery or invention has many disadvantages, which, to someextent, overwhelm its advantages. We need to struggle harder than our progenitorsto achieve success.
文章的思路很缜密,让我受益匪浅!
遣词造句以及结构都很好,最好第二段后再有一个段落和第二段一样是阐明it is harderfor people nowadays to succeed than it is in the past的
加油加油,很厉害的说。
学到了很多! |
|