[风雨与共] 第二周issue习作 issue144 by 【7】

shawn_pysUID: 2770388

Issue
144 "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

1. 说是艺术家为社会创造了具有持久的价值艺术无可非议，因为如果没有艺术家这些艺术就不会出现于世上，而评论家也就无从评论
2. 但是如果没有评论家，因为艺术常常是不容易理解的，很多的艺术可能就不会被人们发现、理解，然后就此埋没于社会，更不会成为具有久远价值的艺术
3. 更为重要的一点是，评论家不但在将优秀的艺术介绍给大众，其还在评价艺术品的过程中发挥着重要的作用，并最终决定哪些艺术作品会载入历史，成为不朽的经典，没有批评家这些是无法做到的



There are a lot of artworks in the history acquired extremely high assessment, and have become our human's immortal classic works of the arts. It's tend to agree that it is the artists who created these tremendous arts, rather than the art critics, but the critics have great importance to society in judge the artworks.

First of all, it's undeniable that it is the artists create the arts. Without artists the art would never have been on the earth, and the art critics will definitely have nothing to criticize. Artist using his proficient skills presents his inner world and passion to the world. This needs talents of art. Only those artworks with high art values and created by a measure of aesthetics can be given the laurel of the art and permanently membered by the history. The Michelangelo's work using plaster represents human's body exactly, beautifully to show human beings on the world the perfect body endowed by the god. Were not Michelangelo who would have these tremendous skills and the insightful thoughts in one person?

But, it's the critics who render the sculpture to the world, and justify its art value. Often the meaning behind the work's surface was obscured to the majority of people, there is only a few people will have the perception to understand the feeling, the passion that the artist wants to represent through the art work. Merely through the critics' judgments of the art work can it be accepted and perceived by the whole society. Without critics, many and many artists' excellent works will be sinking in the sea of art works, let alone to become the classic engraved by history.

Besides, the critics can pass through the views of the public to the artists. With this information the artists will have a better perception of the societies' voices, and then they can create works more close to the popularity. Thus their works may be familiar to large society, and may be easier to produce lasting influences upon the society. And the critics also provide the opposite views to expose flaws of the art works to their artists, and let them aware of the paths to improve their skill of art for the purpose of going further in the art field.

An even more important role of the critics is to choose those tremendous works qualified to enter history, membered forever. This role can never be play by others. The works' viewer doesn't have an adequate system of the aesthetic knowledge. Perhaps there will be a few who have the knowledge to perceive the art, but to an art work different person will have divergent view points and assessment, so that no one can decide what is the real worth of a work, which is a mastered work, which should be documented in art history. Perhaps a host of excellent art works will be lost in history with the long controversy of it. Only the critics have the ability to make the judgment, perhaps may be unfair, but art cannot leave without them.

To sum up, the artists, as the creator of art works, are indispensible. But it is critics who bring the art to large society, assess their art values and social influences, and choose out those mastered should be documented in human history. In short, it is critics bring about something with last meanings to society.

咖啡盐UID: 2973669

144 "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.

1. 说是艺术家为社会创造了具有持久的价值艺术无可非议，因为如果没有艺术家这些艺术就不会出现于世上，而评论家也就无从评论
2. 但是如果没有评论家，因为艺术常常是不容易理解的，很多的艺术可能就不会被人们发现、理解，然后就此埋没于社会，更不会成为具有久远价值的艺术
3. 更为重要的一点是，评论家不但在将优秀的艺术介绍给大众，其还在评价艺术品的过程中发挥着重要的作用，并最终决定哪些艺术作品会载入历史，成为不朽的经典，没有批评家这些是无法做到的



There are a lot of artworks in the history acquired extremely high assessment, and have become our human's immortal classic works of the arts. It's tend to agree that it is the artists who created these tremendous arts, rather than the art critics,（However, I just concede that critics also play irreplaceable role of judging the artworks in society.大致就这个思路觉得更好点，具体还可以再推敲下用词。） but the critics have great importance to society in judge the artworks.

First of all, it's undeniable that it is the artists create the arts. Without artists, the （关于the这个冠词的用法，这是中国学生的一大通病，加了没错，不过最好不要乱加，影响文章严谨性。这里的art是泛指，并没有指代前文提到过的东西，所以不用加。）art would never have been(appear) on the earth, and the art critics will definitely have nothing to criticize.(不是没有东西可以去评论，而是根本不会有艺术评论家了。) Artist using his proficient skills （删）presents his inner world and passion to the world（with his proficient skills）. This needs talents of art. (感觉这句完全可以融入前一段。)Only those artworks with high art values and created by a measure of aesthetics can be given the laurel of the art and permanently membered by the history. (直接写这句话感觉有点突兀，建议和前面练成依据，Although艺术家创造了很多的作品，但是只有真正具有艺术价值的才能被历史铭记。但是如果这样表达的话，牵扯到什么样的作品才是具有很高艺术价值的呢？我也没太想明白，还没开始写这篇的。可以讨论讨论。)The (历史名人不用特指)Michelangelo's work(, David,) using plaster represents human's body exactly, beautifully to show human beings on the （of the）world the perfect body endowed by the god. Were not Michelangelo who would have these tremendous skills and the insightful thoughts in one person?

But, (but开头不够正式，However, Nevertheless, Nonetheless等)it's the critics who render the sculpture to the world, and justify its art value. （清晰明了）Often （能不用often就不要用，不够严谨frequently, regularly）the meaning behind the work's surface was obscured to the majority of people, there is (are)only a few people will have the perception to understand the feeling, the passion that the artist wants to represent through the (their)art works. Merely through the critics' judgments of the art work can it be accepted and perceived by the whole society. Without critics, many and many (没明白)artists' excellent works will be sinking in the sea of art works, let alone to become the classic engraved by history.

Besides, the critics can pass through （respond）the views of the public to the artists. With this information the artists will have a better perception of the societies' voices, and then they can create works more close to the popularity. Thus their works may be familiar to large society, and may be easier to produce lasting influences upon the society. And the critics also provide the opposite views to expose flaws of the art works to their artists, and let them aware of the paths to improve their skill of art for the purpose of going further in the art field.

An even more important role of the critics is to choose those tremendous works qualified to enter history, (这个论点有点不对，能不能成为经典不是他们说了算的，真正的永恒之作是要经过岁月的检验的)membered forever. This role can never be play by others. The works' viewer doesn't have an adequate system of the aesthetic knowledge. Perhaps there will be a few who have the knowledge to perceive the art, but to an art work different person will have divergent view points and assessment, so that no one can decide what is the real worth of a work, which is a mastered work, which should be documented in art history. Perhaps a host of excellent art works will be lost in history with the long controversy of it. Only the critics have the ability to make the judgment, perhaps may be unfair, but art cannot leave without them.

To sum up, the artists, as the creator of art works, are indispensible. But it is critics who bring the art to large society, assess their art values and social influences, and choose out those mastered should be documented in human history. In short, it is critics bring about something with last meanings to society.（和前句有点重复感）

shawn_pysUID: 2770388

2# 咖啡盐


There are a lot of artworks in the history acquired extremely high assessment, and have become our human's immortal classic works of the arts. It's tend(desirable) to agree that it is the artists who created these tremendous arts, rather than the art critics. However, I just concede that critics also play irreplaceable role of judging the artworks in society.

First of all, it's undeniable that it is the artists create the arts. Without artists, art (art works)(这里本来想表达艺术品的,结果变成了艺术...悲剧悲剧,这样的话后面就不用该了吧？) would never have appeared on the earth, and the art critics will definitely have nothing to criticize. Artist presents his inner world and passion to the worldwith his proficient skills. , which needs talents of art. Only those artworks with high art values and created by a measure of aesthetics can be given the laurel of art and permanently membered by the history. It is not able for any artist to create such tremendous works.(加上这句会不会好点?)Michelangelo's work, David, using plaster represents human's body exactly, beautifully to show human beings on the （of the）world the perfect body endowed by the god. Were not Michelangelo who would have these tremendous skills and the insightful thoughts in one single person?

However,it's the critics who render the sculpture to the world, and justify its art value. Frequently, the meaning behind the work's surface was obscured to the majority of people, thereareonly a few people will have the perception to understand the feeling, the passion that the artist wants to represent through their art works. Merely through the critics' judgments(assessments and explanations) of the art work can it be accepted and perceived by the whole society. Without critics, a great quantity of artists' excellent works will be sinking in the sea of art works, let alone to become the classic engraved by history.

Besides, the critics can respond the views of the public to the artists. With this information the artists will have a better perception of the societies' voices, and then they can create works more close to the popularity. Thus their works may be familiar to large society, and may be easier to produce lasting influences upon the society. And the critics also provide the opposite views to expose flaws of the art works to their artists, and let them aware of the paths to improve their skill of art for the purpose of going further in the art field.

An even more important role of the critics is to choose those tremendous works qualified to enter history,(这个论点有点不对，能不能成为经典不是他们说了算的，真正的永恒之作是要经过岁月的检验的)(好多人都是你这个观点,不过我认为其实还是一代一代的批评家的检验.大众的观点是无法胜任的,因为其观点太多太杂,而且有那么多的作品,如果没有一个系统的评判体系,就会变成萝卜白菜,各有所爱了,而作为艺术家不容易客观公正的评定他人的作品,然后会不断的有新作品出现,然后旧的就被淘汰了.个人是这个观点，可能缺了例证吧。) membered forever. This role can never be play by others. The works' viewer doesn't have an adequate system of the aesthetic knowledge. Perhaps there will be a few who have the knowledge to perceive the art, but to an art work different person will have divergent view points and assessment, so that no one can decide what is the real worth of a work, which is a mastered work, which should be documented in art history. Perhaps a host of excellent art works(, which would have become classics,) will be lost in history with the long controversy of it. Only the critics have the ability to make the judgment, perhaps may be unfair, but art cannot leave without them.

To sum up, the artists, as the creator of art works, are indispensible. But it is critics who bring the art to large society, assess their art values and social influences, and choose out those mastered should be documented in human history. In short, it is critics bring about something with last meanings to society.（和前句有点重复感）(本意是想把前面的总结一下，顺便扣题，我感觉吧对待老外要把东西都挑明了才行，也不知道对不，In short应该是重复前面的吧？望高人指点~)