风雨与共 第二周issue144 by 【5】

arksapmis30UID: 2973097

没写提纲没看题目直接开了AWP就搞了。。写得感觉逻辑有点乱~哎。。刚开始限时还找不到状态。


While asserting that the major impact on the whole mainstream social perspective and idea should largely ascribed to the artists in that it is the artists, such as writers, painters, musicians' creations that deeply influence what we think, what we care and what we dream. The speaker at the same time absolutely ignores the certain fact that the famous creation of art cannot be composed without the crucial guide of the critic. It is certain that completely complying with the view and idea of critic can achieve nothing but ruin the original idea and thought of the artists. However, on the other hand fully ignorance of the critic's view would also be a impediment to the advancement of art. For the critic may largely be representative of the mainstream view of the society, this is especially true when it comes to the idea of critic who possessed great talents, experience and wide perspective.

First of all, it is undeniable that artists play the major role in affecting the path of progress in both humanity and society. All we cannot ignore is that with grandiose talent and sense of rebellion and creativity, the artists can achieve even more unbelievable objective that we cannot imagine. Consider, for example, the famous Impressionist, Claude Monet, who compose the unbelievable masterpiece, "impression,sunrise", which give the very name to the whole impressionism movement. Also should we notice Vincent Van Gogh, a post-impressionist who only obtain the reputation from the mainstream society after his death. We can find lots of instances from the review of history just like the facts discussed above. All these examples have a certain similarity, which is these artists all did not be truly recognized by their time's mainstream society, nor by critics. On the other hand they even resurrected against the mainstream, just like the conflict and disagreement among acadamicism and impressionism.

However, merely based on the facts and discussion mentioned above, hardly can we draw the conclusion that there is no needs for the critics. Several flaws of the originality of art that can be avoided by the restrictions of critics also cannot be ignored. First, the fact that art is the certain way of expression of the various thoughts and ideas of artists cannot be neglected and understated. Human thoughts are inconstant and diverse, it cannot be promised that all creation of the artists is positive and beneficial to the progress of society. Consider, for example, the rock music ,especially death metal, gothic metal and many other types of music such as these will absolutely cause distortion of the ideas and thoughts of people, they prompt the youth to release their anger to the society, which might ultimately ruin the foundation of it.

Moreover, artists also needs to be recognized by the critics who possessed grandiose talents and experience, in that the artists largely have the eager to fulfill their own value to the society, not only by being admitted by the public, but also by being recognized by the critics that possessed the similar talent . In the ancient China there is a famous story about the friendship of Boya and Ziqi, whose relation is just like the musician and critic. Only after the death of Ziqi did the talented musician Boya abandoned his instruments and music.


In sum, due to the unpredictable will of artists, the creation of them can also be unpredictable and might be potentially harmful to the society, and adequate recognition by the famous critics is also necessary for the artists. So in my view, certain restriction should by conducted by the critics who possessed grandiose talents and perspectives. To strike a delicate balance among the idea of both critics and artists is the crucial foundation for the further advancement of both society and humanity.

nofeelings811UID: 2388638

- -竟然拿摇滚乐作为反例，我假装愤怒的离去了

arksapmis30UID: 2973097

2# nofeelings811

呵呵~哥们息怒~~我表示这是想到啥写啥。。完全乱诌。。。