- 最后登录
- 2008-10-13
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 1656
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2002-10-9
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 10
- 积分
- 2014
- UID
- 112318
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1656
- 注册时间
- 2002-10-9
- 精华
- 10
- 帖子
- 3
|
断断续续的练习Issue大概十篇了吧, 刚开始觉得非常生涩, 然后越写越顺, 心情也随之变好, 但是我写到十篇左右的时候,也就是最近的两篇,突然觉得下笔没的可写, 有一种思路枯竭的感觉. 以前是有想法不知道该怎么写出来, 现在是不知道该写什么. 嗯, 保持练习吧. 这次是传媒类, Issue 151, SUN Yuan 83, 请指教!
Topic: High-speed electronic communications media, such as electronic mail and television, tend to prevent meaningful and thoughtful communication.
Syllabus: my position: electronic communications have obvious advantages over traditional way of communications.
1: it is seems that electronic communications plays a more and more significant role in our daily life.
2: on the other side of the coin, it cannot replace traditional ways of communication, such as face-to-face interaction.
Text:
Do high-speed electronic communications media, such as electronic mail and television; tend to prevent meaningful and thoughtful communication, as the author’s asserts? I think the preposterousness of such a suggestion is clear enough: it seems like the author unfairly exaggerates the disadvantages of electronic communications. By this I mean although high-speed electronic communications media can perform most functions that traditional media have provided, they have obvious advantages over tradition ways. To get a full understanding of what this means we must turn first to some recent human inventions.
First of all, let us get down to fundamentals and agree that the e-mail and telephone has replaced the traditional letter as the first choice of our telecommunications. In this case, empirical evidence supporting this position is overwhelming, yet one need look no father than the personal computer in his study or telephone hangs up on the wall of his living room. Why is this so? It seems that e-mail and telephone is more vivid and economic and high-speed than traditional letters. While the author claims e-mail tend to prevent meaningful and thoughtful communication, however, if one examines the ways of both sides, it becomes evidence that it is the e-mail which is just meaningful and thoughtful. For instance, I can attach a picture of me or a short piece of movie of my recent living in my e-mail to Mom, although we are apart from, I can display myself to her with all dimensions of media, but how can I do those during a letter by two piece of paper? For the reasons given above, I firmly hold that e-mail has no trend to prevent meaningful and thoughtful communication.
But when it comes to the other side of the coin, electronic communications media also have many disadvantages so that it cannot replace every traditional ways such as face-to-face talking. To be more precise, shortages and scarcities of e-transmit are the same clear as the strong points of it: it cannot provide social or collective activities of human beings. That is to say high-speed electronic communications media sometimes tend to create passive, isolated and indifferent communicators, preventing people from effective face-to-face interaction. Furthermore, e-transmit depends on network and electric system so much, in other words, if the service of network or electronic power has something wrong, all communications base on it will cease, even collapsed.
In conclusion, with the rapid development of science, the ways of communication have reached a stage at which we can transmit our information by electronic way. Although the author’s claim is not entirely without support, it runs contrary to common sense and everyday human experience. By this I concede that sometimes electronic communications have a few of disadvantages over traditional way of communications; however, as a recent development of internet technology, their positive functions hold more lasting significance. |
|