请求大家狂拍AI48

vcvc1127UID: 2661085

48"The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten."

The speaker tends to claim that the history study emphasize the significance of individual a lot, while the influence of common people is often neglected. The most important issues happened in history, according to the speaker, became possible because of the unknown groups of people. The individuals with fame and prestige in history, however, are actually more decisive to the study of history than the general public, as mostly they are the trigger and fuse of the vital incidents and by studying them, historians can identify their traits, backgrounds and so on, which can be typical, so as to get deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the times. Along with the crucial role individuals played, nevertheless, historians should also percieve the fact that it is the mass and unknown people in the past that made the critical incidents happened.

To begin with, the noted persons in the history is the concentration of the history study, because they led the trend or the momentous occasions were triggered by them. And thus studying these VIP makes great contributions to the history research. Gandhi, who was the leader of the Indian nationalist movement and the Congress Party, planned and organized numerous significant nonviolent pretests, which helps to promote the India to to break away from the dominaion of U.K. and gain its indendence. Historians, by studing his experience, believes, values and propositions, can get more accurate understanding on the historical incidents’ background, cause and effect.

Besides, the historical figures are often equipped with the specific traits, backgrounds and experience that can represent their era. Take the three renowned artists in the Renaissance for instance. By receiving knowledge that not only did Da Vinci make dedication to the sociey with hisbrilliant ast works, but he also did such a deep research in many fields of nature science, such as anatomy and astronomy, that he boosted the overall development of science at that time, and therefore had osmosis on the generations of scientists to come. Raphael, on the other hand, performed his art and thoughts in a manner of harmony and perfection, and bequeathed the posterity with techniques and ideas on how to create such style of art works. In addition, Michelangelo filled his sculpture and masterpiece with his cogitation on the humanism and Reformation. Albiet the three pretigious had their own features in art, on the whole they benefit the human being, and learning abour these historical individuals greatly helps researchers to get deeper and comprehensive understanding of the past.

Yet, necessary is the study of celebrated persons, the importance of unknown public in history should also be underlined. Without the unsung groups of people, the VIPs would not have power and labor to complete their feat. Without the uncelebrated people, the historial individuals would not have been supported and remembered by descendants. Hence historians should pay attention to the unknown and unsung people in history’s study.

In conclusion, the study of history should not emphasize the significance of individuals too much. Yet historians should also not that the unidentified people are essential for the crucial events to happen.

wowoyuweiweiUID: 2754055

1# vcvc1127

kidsonxianUID: 3001754

教你一招比较实用的，发现矛盾，提出问题，再探讨问题；例如本题中，正面是多数人被遗忘；为什么？因为难以记录，少贡献；真的吗？普通个体的特殊性呢？例如陈胜是农民，起义后地位的转变；但他们推动历史的进程；这样说的话，他们也应该被记录？碍于资源，我们只能在有限的程度上记录他们，事实上，有了face book，micro blog这些东西，每个人都在记录自己；但是会问，历史学家就是为了记录你吗？不是，因为社会、科技等的发展，历史学家通常会针对地为特殊的人研究；是谁？（引出反面，少数的被记录的人）；为神马是他们？怎样被记录？他们有个人所长，特殊地位；承认他们的力量比普通个体大，被记录是有特殊意义的；特殊的意义是什么？对后人的启迪？对比双方的力量、人数、人数多跟人数少又不同了，发现双方的地位是？领导、被领导？如何相互作用的，如何转变的？随着历史潮流的变更，这两方面的地位有没有改变？变成怎样？将会怎样？展望？

kidsonxianUID: 3001754

To begin with, it is universally known that historian aptly tend to focus on important persons because they are epitomized enough to represent a special social group, kinds of advanced spirit, or they equipped with the ability to make tremendous processes in natural science or technology; these individuals are special persons whom are often called “heroes”, being entrusted with historical burden which others are not for lack of distinctive; rather interestingly, however, heroes somehow survive and then thrive in alleged unknown group or masses; without the step-by step progress, hardly can heroes appear; 举例，甘地原来只是普通人，经过自身经历，思想得以发展，创建理论，被选为领袖，变得特殊，，，，，，，， 本段结尾要写到他们是特殊的，他们值得被记录，他们对历史有贡献；

转到第二段，提出疑问，难道其他人就不重要？难道其他人就不能变圣人？事实是，很多人被历史遗忘，但是他们的贡献却没有被忽视，但不意味着他们被遗弃，因为历史记录了这些事实，而不能否认，历史是大多数人的推动结果；客观原因使我们忘记了很多人的名字，但他们留下的历史是不会磨灭的；个体也有特殊性，只是对比起来，没有圣人特出；然后引出其地位对比；

面对这样的问题时，我们会否想到个人和群众力量的均衡和对比；个人力量再大，也是建立在群中之上的，华盛顿没有了军队就不能成就伟业；然而，群众之中，不能没有华盛顿的智慧和才能；两方面就像是链和链结；而且，在人类的发展过程中，越来越重视个体的地位，例如，国家重大灾难的灾民会被记录，战争受难者会被记录，这也体现的人文关怀的持续前进；

结尾升华，真正被历史遗忘的是大多数人，然而他们的贡献没有被抛弃，只是客观条件阻碍了对他们的一一记录；杰出的人能被记录，与他们特殊地位有关，被记录、关注也是合理的，却不能过分高估其地位；因为，从发展的角度看，个体与整体密不可分，相互作用；