- 最后登录
- 2014-10-4
- 在线时间
- 105 小时
- 寄托币
- 369
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2011-1-27
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 17
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 192
- UID
- 2999177
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 369
- 注册时间
- 2011-1-27
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 17
|
发表于 2011-1-30 03:41:58
|显示全部楼层
Issue69
Government should place few, if any, restriction on scientific research and development
Word”487
No one can deny fast development of technology in all fields today. Should the government restrict the research and development? The speaker claims so. I concede undue scientific research should be imposed government restriction. However, in my view the scientific research and development within moral rules should not be banned.
More emphasis should be placed in restrictions of science which may threat social stability. Though scientists are trying to dig out even the deepest law in their own field, the research itself may spark fears among ordinary
people. As
the European Organization built the Large Hadron Collider for the intention of examinating diverse predictions of high-energy physics, the research at the Large Hadron Collider led to a panic among the public that the enormous energy caused by particle collisions might produce doomsday phenomena. Government should take apt action to ban this kind of inhuman experiments, thus protecting security of people and its nation.
Others, me included, are a little adverse about that vision. The restrictions put by the government may be serve an important function or protect society from damage or disturbance, however, undue limitation from the authorities can be poison to the development and research in the scientific field. Further more, we can not deny the fact that most of the scientific research makes a major contribution to booming economy and production efficiency. As we can see it from past, too many lessons in Middle Ages we can learn from show us for fear of the turmoil among society, the roman church forced a cruel punishment on the astronomers who pointed out the fallacy that the earth was at the center of the universe, which had long been the basis of roman doctrine. The tragedy that great discoverers were burn under the rule of the society, excludes the possibility to scientific thriving and any leap in social development.
What's more, no one can pay for price of the backward in science, when a country is hesitating whether to restrict the development of science, other countries exceed. As a famous old saying goes, failure is backward, and backward is to take.
Weaker countries of which technology depends on others with advanced techniques are doomed to be bullied by stronger countries.
Therefore, some research harmful to human being can be confined reasonably by the government, while other experiments in science should not. Instead of imposing restrictions, the government should provide substantial support to the experiments to ensure the progress ahead of the time and the rest of the world.
I admit some research should be banned immediately. Generally, as the fast speeding world developed, a country
without needful scientific research and experiments will lose its standing in the world. Now,
undoubtedly it's most worthwhile for the government to provide as much financial support as it can to serve to science in order to make use of technology and faster development of a nation's strength.
|
|