argue提纲45,209,207,14,233,238,15,37,10,1,

civilppUID: 2999177

45
1.
globle situation might don’t fit the situation in arctic region
2.
no evidence support that if they can’ go across the ice they will die
3.
no evidence support the ice melt in actic
4.
other factors hunter)
5.
no causal relationship with traveling and decline numbers

209
1.
R in SJ can not justify she will do well similar in F,other factors
2.
no causal relationship between decline and P, (depression; strategy)
3.
cost for R and profit
4.
only R can’t be enough
5.
other method: change position; change consumer target


207
1.
Earth’s ozone layer worldwide doesn’t mean it in mountain lakes will does
2.
we don’t know any evidence preventing S burn without protective shells will prevent the numbers of S
3.
the situation in S cant fit other species
4.
other factors(hunters;weather;adaption)

14 ARGU14
1.
nationwide
2.
last month
3.
gardening magazine (the quality or the cover; not interested in plant vegetables)
4.
village news ( only available magazine; near subway) not indicate this magazine in other magazine seller will sold well
5.
insufficient methods; center focus on propaganda ;
6.
not satisfied with the vegetable supplied by supermarkets, the consumers can also choose to buy directly from farmers who grow vegetable or other ways to choose

233
1.
cost and profit
2.
no relationship between machinery and managers
3.
shopping mall and road building
4.
ignore other disadvantage of M
5.
may be the A’s does not look good
6.
cant last in the foreseeable future
7.
may be A will adapt the changing time
238

1.
no causal evidence between interview skill and course and employment
2.
not comparable: G’s no time limit but M’s do
3.
other factors: M’s focus on academic intension
4.
other factors: academic quality
5.
only one year comparision cant explain
6.
situation in G cant fit M
7.
major field of study full time work doesn’t mean low employment
8.
no evidence it will last in the future

15
80% of the respondents in survey are incline to low cholesterol food;
Stores contain low cholesterol food
The O company marked high cholesterol food
Don’t invest
1.
survey’s quantities number(whether they are honest); who conduct the survey; how does the survey be conducted
2.
no relationship; maybe customers will buy other high cholesterol food
3.
the O company may have high cholesterol food but tasted well or have other aspects appealing to customer(more healthy, more attracting cover or lead the trend)
4.
The mere fact that many Old Dairy’s food products are high in fat and cholesterol does not necessarily prove that their stock is not worth investing.(marketing strategies)
5.
The author ignores the possibility that Old Dairy may change its policy and main product in the future.

10
1 fail to substantiate the price in E can necessarily represent the milk price in B.
2 the rising price and the rising proportion of milk suppliers. Transfer to supply the dairy product, not milk.
3. even the milk suppliers through out the
country increase doesn’t mean the milk suppliers in B will do so.
4.The author fails to substantiate that the actual rising price after the adjustment to inflation
5.fail to provide evidence of the information of the whole people, it is possible that the milk suppliers are still a small number compared to the whole demmanding.
6 cost analyze (transporting expenses; cost of labor; the feed costs)
7 other methods to lower the price
8 and even worse the bad result like lower the employment and milk supplier can not find other way to survive
Commensurable

Argu1
1.
The sale of running shoes and exercise clothing are high does not necessarily indicate the fact that people tend to live a healthy life.
2.
Even if people liked to lead a healthy life style, there’s no evidence to show that the city residents are cline to buy health food or other health-related product.
3.
Even if the resident in P will put the health food or health-related product in their shopping lists, the author fail to point out that the information of the same stores like NW in P, thus cannot convince me that the people will buy the products in NW rather than in other healthy product store.
4.
Even NW is the only health food supplier in P and the residents will definitely choose to buy health food, the author imply the NW will be profitable on the basis of two unproven assumption: 1) people will keep this interests in buying healthy food in the foreseeable future.
2) the number of residents and the proportion of the residents who like to buy health food