第一次写issue,求好心人很拍！谢谢啦~

蛋炒面UID: 2866766

GRE Issue第108题
In many countries it is now possible to turn on the television and view government at work. Watching these proceedings can help people understand the issues that affect their lives. The more kinds of government proceedings—trials, debates, meetings, etc—that are televised, the more society will benefit.

正文：
Does the more kinds of government proceedings be televised, the more benefit society?

Recently, viewing governments at work by television is possible in many countries. The speaker claims that people can understand the issues that affect their lives by watching these proceedings, and that the more is the better for society. Generaly speaking, I can't more agree with the former, but tend to disagree with the latter.

Admittedly, it is a chance for civilization to learn about what their leaders have promised, for only special groups of people can absolutely understand the roots of claims and rules-for example, protecting sources, cutting down taxes- by government. Listening to a term of economic reforms is boring to the masses, for who watching how to do it otherwise might be interesting. This theory is just similar as teacher plants a tree directly instead of telling students to dig, water, and so forth.

Moreover, people will be confident in their governments by watching these government proceedings from television. Such as  a research informs us that Chinese feel more happy in recent years, for now we can acquire news of government  significent meetings, political reforms, and social changes in time from television where it was hard for civilization knew why they cannot go to work in the wave of hiring. It will never bring debates that viewing governments at work abridges the distance between rulers and ordinary people. American presidential election is a typical case. John Fitzgerald Kennedy, a famous historical figure, is the first one in American history to acquire crown by the help of television, just for the simple reason that civilization felt they knew about him from his television speakings. In other words, with television, Kennedy made possible that most of voters trusted in him.

However, if secrets referring to the safety of countries are brought to the masses, also the unsafe situations will be brought to. As a result, the more is not the better now, and never will. The same as masses have the right to know how governments are dealing with their interests, governments have the right to conceal significent country secrets. For example, if Chinese leaders allowed us to watch how they were researching nuclear weapon,  it might be more than three countries that have the nuclear technology. To some extent, ordinary people are unintelligent about polical reforms and enconomic innovations. With unintelligent civilization, more kinds of government proceedings telesived would not bring benefit to society but obstructions to governments.

To sum up, government proceedings build stadges for ordinary people to learn about sociopolitical policy, enocomic events, and even their leaders. Yet, some kinds of proceedings should be secrets forever concerning about country safety and government efficienty. Of course, governments should continue working on the air in the condition of concealing some kinds of significent proceedings.

蛋炒面UID: 2866766

哪位好心人帮个忙~