Which of the following most probably provides an appropriate analogy from human morphology for the “details” versus “constraints” distinction made in the passage in relation to (in relation to: adv.关于, 涉及, 与…相比) human behavior?
问题是human morphology for the “details” versus “constraints” distinction
还原到文章 第一段的开头
Some modern anthropologists hold that biological evolution has shaped not only human morphology but also human behavior. The role those anthropologists ascribe to evolution is not of dictating the details of human behavior but one of imposing constraints
只有第一段开始提到了human morphology 而题目中说 human morphology for the “details” 是不是暗示着evolution is not of dictating the details of human behavior 在人类行为中不是dictating details 而在 human morphology中是
而evolution 对 human behavior 则是
Our “frailties”—emotions and motives such as rage, fear, greed, gluttony, joy, lust, love—may be a very mixed assortment, but they share at least one immediate quality: we are, as we say, “in the grip” of them. And thus they give us our sense of constraints.
给我们一种限制 这里我觉得就是比如 你在一个很安静的教室里上自习 如果需要接电话 你一定会走出教室 不会在教室里面直接接 这种行为就是come naturally的,是内心底的想法限制了我们的行为,而这些想法就是在一个文化环境中潜移默化形成的。
题里我觉得是更强调了constrain 限制 不能突破的
所以people’s inability to fly without special apparatus 是一种限制 是不能突破的