寄托天下
查看: 1516|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[未归类] 好心人看看我的综合写作还靠谱不? 头回写 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
862
注册时间
2010-11-21
精华
0
帖子
5
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-25 17:24:37 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TPO-1

The lecturer shared a entirely different opinion with the article which advocates the advantage of giving options to have a four-day week. He said that four-day week is not a rational choice for both the employers and employees.

First, the cost would be much higher if the four-day week's plan is adopted. If we cut the working hours of each employee, we surely need more people to do the same work. That is to say, more office rooms, more computers are needed. In the meantime, the costs of training and medical are skyrocketing. Apparently, this will increase the total cost, which contradicts what the passage says.

Second,the lecture indicates that every employers want to make more profit with less cost. So they tends to make the employees to work overtime. Consequently, the employees actually do the same amount of work with less money. How can they be effective? This point also refute the viewpoint of the passage.
Third,the lecture demonstrated the risk of the employee's decision to work 4 days instead of 5.  He said the employees who work 4 days a week is not stable since that they are probably the first one to loose the job. Also, the employers are inclined to promote the people who choose to work more days per week. In other words, the employee who work 4 days get less opportunity than who work 5 days.


TPO-6

The lecturer advocates for the advantages of the communal online encyclopedias over the traditional ones. He stressed that although communal online encyclopedias is definetely not a perfect one, it does show some strength that defeats the traditional ones. What he said just refutes the article in the following points.

First, the online encyclopedia is often upgraded, which means that the information in it is always the latest, which is somewhat far more accurate than the traditional encyclopedia. What's more, the every items in the online encyclopedia are down by several people and others can also fix them if some mistakes are found. The previous view is opposed to the view in the articles.

Second, as for the so-called unscrupulous users mentioned in the article, the lecturer defends that this situation can be avoided. That is to say, the online encyclopedia has already adopt methods setting the crucial information to the read-only format to prevent it from being meliciously changed. Furthermore the encyclopedia also hire some people to arrange the items.
This also contradicts what the article indicates.

Third, the lecturer states that the frequency of the topics in online encyclopedias exactly reflect the public interest on such events, which is just the opposite as what the article expresses. As a matter of fact, the lecturer thinks that let the user to choose what topic to put as a priority is apparently the most advantages of the online encyclopedia not a drawback.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
2
寄托币
1567
注册时间
2011-4-3
精华
0
帖子
16
沙发
发表于 2011-8-25 17:46:06 |只看该作者
每个段落可以一句话带过一下reading materials里面的观点
梦想?和家人每周末在老特拉福德看着reds奔跑…

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
862
注册时间
2010-11-21
精华
0
帖子
5
板凳
发表于 2011-8-25 20:54:43 |只看该作者
2# nprotect
恩 谢谢 我也发现了这个问题:lol

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
12
寄托币
2146
注册时间
2010-7-17
精华
0
帖子
51
地板
发表于 2011-8-25 21:20:06 |只看该作者
写得不错

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
0
寄托币
862
注册时间
2010-11-21
精华
0
帖子
5
5
发表于 2011-8-25 21:33:24 |只看该作者
4# zxzczvb
呵呵 我放心多了~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
2
寄托币
1567
注册时间
2011-4-3
精华
0
帖子
16
6
发表于 2011-8-25 21:58:59 |只看该作者
综合写作这货其实就是填空作文嘛~ 关键在于听的时候记下的东西 听不能杯具…… 我821的最后一个小点就有点听的支离破碎了 T-T
梦想?和家人每周末在老特拉福德看着reds奔跑…

使用道具 举报

RE: 好心人看看我的综合写作还靠谱不? 头回写 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
好心人看看我的综合写作还靠谱不? 头回写
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1299165-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部