求助一道阅读题

fadotianUID: 2733387

Exercise 4 的 3-6    NO.6-1

5. The author of the passage believes that Black Fiction would have been improved had Rosenblatt
(A) evaluated more carefully the ideological and historical aspects of Black fiction
(B) attempted to be more objective in his approach to novels and stories by Black
authors
(C) explored in greater detail the recurrent thematic concerns of Black fiction throughout its history
(D) established a basis for placing Black fiction within its own unique literary tradition
(E) assessed the relative literary merit of the novels he analyzes thematically

应该选E，定位是在“Rosenblatt‘s thematic analysis permits considerable objectivity; he even explicitly states that it is not his intention to judge the merit of the various works—yet his reluctance seems misplaced, especially since an attempt to appraise might have led to interesting results.”
但是我怎么也看不出E和原文的对应关系呀。谁能帮忙解释下呢？

征夷大将军UID: 3048328

Rosenblatt‘s thematic analysis permits considerable objectivity; he even explicitly states that it is not his intention to judge the merit of the various works—yet his reluctance seems misplaced, especially since an attempt to appraise might have led to interesting results.
R的主旨分析具有很强的客观性；他甚至明显地表示他没有意向去评价各种作品的长处——但是他的不情愿似乎放错了位置，特别是在因为这种分析的意图可以得到很有趣的结果的时候。

文章似乎就是说R太过于客观了，甚至连一丁点的主观评价都没有，然后作者就评论道：其实你主观一点也没有关系啊，因为有时候主观评价可以出现很有趣的结果。

所以显然作者是稍微地批判了一下R的过于客观，所以如果他能有主观评价，就可以有improvement.

fadotianUID: 2733387

明白了，谢谢两位！还是句子的深层含义没有理解透