贴一篇tpo19的综合写作，请求大家帮帮忙，两次考式都是F

STOOIBT1UID: 2921281

这是我tpo19的综合写作，按考试要求完成的。跪求nn们帮帮忙~



the part-time professor' presentation deals with the issue which is the same as what the reading passage concentrates on. however, he oppositely thinks that the three reasons mentioned in the reading about the negative influence of buzzing on consumer and society all are unfounded. and he also gives us three reason to support his idea, which makes what the reading dubious.

primarily, even though the reading passage suggest that the buzzers will mislead the consumer by using that consumer does not know they are buzzers, the professor frown on this point. this is because buzzers are those who truly think the product is good. so they will put the misleading information to the consumers.

further, in the opposition to the statement about the consumers less critically paying attention on the product when buzzers adverting their product, the professor maintains that quite the opposite, the consumer will ask more when a buzzer sells a product. and the professor proves this is true by pointing out the specific question which consumer will ask for buzzers, such as the duration of certain product being used and the price of the product.

finally, the professor claims that the new tactic, buzzing, will not pose threaten for the social relationships, while the reading passage cites this as a powerful reason to reject buzzing. and the professor demonstrates that the process of buzzing is the process that people share a good experience and product, so on the contrary, this will benefit that society. so the third reason to refuse this new tactic in advertising is also unsustainable.

to sum up, the professor has clearly showed that the central reason using to refuse the buzzing advertising tactic in the reading is untenable.

这里先谢过大家了！