宏观经济政策与“吸血鬼”

威尔·熊UID：2975143

最近正在期待twilight breaking dawn，结果看到这篇JPE啊～看到title瞬间比看到Krugman的星际贸易还要兴奋。。。:P
Macroeconomic Policy and the Optimal Destruction of Vampires

http://rigotnomics.blogspot.com/2011/06/macroeconomic-policy-and-optimal.html

ouyangtraceyUID：2706625

这个题目有趣~勾起了我的好奇心~但是link打不开~国内难道上不了这个网么

WildSwanAtCooleUID：3060718

Macroeconomic Policy and the Optimal Destruction of Vampires
This is the title of a 1982 JPE article by Dennis Snower. Here's the intro:

Although human beings have endured the recurring ravages of vampires for centuries, scarcely any attempts have been made to analyze the macroeconomic implications of this problem and to devise socially optimal policy responses. Despite the increasing incidence of vampire epidemics in recent years (in Transylvania, Hollywood, and elsewhere), vampirism remains a thoroughly neglected topic in the theory of macroeconomic policy. The "vampires" considered in this paper are not the blood-sucking bats (e.g., Desmodus rotundus or Diphylla ecaudata) to be found in the forests of tropical America, but the blood-sucking ghosts of dead Homo sapiens. The bats are comparatively innocuous; aside from taking their occasional blood sample from missionaries asleep in the jungle, they have had no measurable influence on human welfare. The blood-sucking ghosts, on the other hand, have periodically provided grave threats to human populations; their most conspicuous macroeconomic impact arises from their detrimental effect on the labor force.

The author does not provide empirical evidence but builds a model of human-vampire dynamics. One derived theorem, illustrated in Figure 2, is the Vampire Neutrality Theorem:
The spontaneous generation of vampires (i.e., the appearance of vampires ex nihilo) affects the optimal x and s in the short run but not in the long run. In other words, vampires are neutral in the long run.