alexfanfan's Daily Writing

alexfanfanUID: 3133140

2月6日 101009NA Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

People can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside.

We, as adults, have the right to choose where to settle down for our family. Big cities or quiet countryside is always a question for most of us. Some would appreciate the slower pace of life and more natural lifestyle in the countryside, while others prefer the convenient city life. As for me, live in the big cities makes more senses. Let me explain my points as follows.

First, big cities have more access to good education than the countryside. You can draw this conclusion without doubts. As a teacher myself, I know clearly that even our government has tried really hard for years to even the imbalance of education quality and resources between cities and countryside. There is still quite a long way to go. For example, just in one distract of Shanghai, there are more than 20 primary schools. However, in the countryside, we all know it is not a myth for some students to walk hours of mountain road to reach their school. How could you take care of your children under that circumstance?

Second, compared with countryside, medical care is far more professional and of course, advanced in big cities. Just imagine one of your family members was sick in the midnight, what would you do? Naturally, you want to send him/her to the nearest hospital as soon as possible. It is not a big deal if you live in a big city. But if you had even been to countryside, you know you got to race against time seriously. What's more, the basic medical facilities in the countryside are commonly not even a match for those in big cities. Unless you yourself are a doctor, don't take the risk to live in the countryside with your family.

Third, the fact that more job opportunities in big cities compared with countryside is universally recognized. To earn the bread and butter for your family members, you have to get a job. Obviously, it is easier to achieve that goal, if you live in the city. Don't believe it? Just Google it and you will see. Someone may argue that living in the countryside while working in the city is also not a bad idea. But according to a research, the more time you spend on the daily commuting, the higher possibility for you to get divorce. So, it is good to live in big cities for sweet family life, isn't it?

Consider the points shown above, I therefore reinforce my standpoint to take better care of family members, live in big cities won't be an awful choice.

sodapengUID: 3242849

已改~~~

loveinwcUID: 3241878

不好意思撒，改晚了，然后~~好期待您给我改的哇~~~~~~（星星眼ing）

alexfanfanUID: 3133140

2月7日 100306NA Some people believe that people should follow their ambitious dreams and goals even they are not
realistic, others believe that people should focus on achieving realistic goals.

Everyone owns unique dreams and goals. Some are ambitious, while others are realistic. To achieve something, we
should have these dreams and goals. But on which should we emphasize more? As far as I am concerned, realistic
goals outweight ambitious dreams.

First of all, realistic goals can bring more confidence, because they are easier to achieve. The frustration,just
like flooding, is unstoppable, if one try really hard but still failed to realize some kind of dream. Take English
learning as as example. Every learner wish enjoying the obstacle-free reading experience of English books. With no
doubt, it is an ambitious dream for beginners, because to realize the dream, it usually takes years for one to have
a grasp of vocabulary, gramma and cultural background. After months of learning, still feel difficult to understand
even some children's fairy tales is not an exception. As a result, such an ambitious dream will usually end up with
frustration. But how about set reading easy stories as the goal first, then confidently step by step, mountain view
can be overlooked sooner or later.

Second, realistic goals can claify the way ahead, while ambitious dreams are mostly vague. Although no one can deny
the fact that ambitious dreams could sever as a terminal direction for us, people need realistic goals to sever as
milestones. These milestones can tell us where to go, so that we won't lose the way. More importantly, they could
remind us taht if we are chasing a pavement,which will lead to nowhere. Before a complete defeat, there could have
chance to survive.

Third, as a famous Chinese saying goes, a thousand miles' travel start from the steps you take. Most people have
dreams, but not so many can realize them. One idea always have haunted me for a long time, before Martin Luther King
Jr. made the sensational speech 'I have a dream', how many people have already dreamed the same dream? Why it is him,
Mr.King, and only him, made it? Actually, the famous speech is just the culmination of his whole plan. And no one
can argue the fact that ambitious dreams sometimes are too big for ordinary people to hold.

In conclusion, given that realistic goals obtain more merits than ambitious dreams,I therefore want to reinforce my
points that realistic goals are more suitable for us.


牙膏终于挤完了。。。补了昨天的作业。。。

laozhanguotoeflUID: 3246339

Everyone owns unique dreams and goals. Some are ambitious, while others are realistic. To achieve something, we should have these dreams and goals. But on which should we emphasize more? As far as I am concerned, realistic goals outweight ambitious dreams.

First of all, realistic goals can bring more confidence, because they are easier to achieve. The frustration, just like flooding, is unstoppable, if one try really hard but still failed to realize some kind of dream. Take English learning as an example. Every learner wish enjoying the obstacle-free reading experience of English books. With no doubt, it is an ambitious dream for beginners, because to realize the dream, it usually takes years for one to have a grasp of vocabulary, gramma grammar and cultural background. After months of learning, still feel difficult to understand even some children's fairy tales is not an exception. As a result, such an ambitious dream will usually end up with frustration. But how about set reading easy stories as the goal first, then confidently step by step, mountain view rcan be overlooked sooner or later.
Second, realistic goals can clarify the way ahead, while ambitious dreams are mostly vague. Although no one can deny the fact that ambitious dreams could sever as a terminal direction for us, people need realistic goals to sever as milestones. These milestones can tell us where to go, so that we won't lose the way. More importantly, they could remind us that if we are chasing a pavement, whichwill lead 感觉leads更好 to nowhere. Before a complete defeat, there could have chance to survive.
Third, as a famous Chinese saying goes, a thousand miles' travel start from the steps you take. Most people have
dreams, but not so many can realize them. One idea always already have haunted me for a long time, before Martin Luther King Jr. made the sensational speech 'I have a dream', how many people have already dreamed the same dream? Why it is him, Mr. King, and only him, made it? Actually, the famous speech is just the culmination of his whole plan. And no one can argue the fact that ambitious dreams sometimes are too big for ordinary people to hold.
In conclusion, given that realistic goals obtain more merits than ambitious dreams, I therefore want to reinforce my points that realistic goals are more suitable for us.
楼主文章熟练老道，可圈可点之处比比皆是，实为佳作，我辈已经没有能力修改楼主的文章。。 待我留下来细细研究，模仿学习。。

肿么字体这么诡异！！

alexfanfanUID: 3133140

3月17日 110415 comparing to hiring famous teachers, school should pay more attention to improve facilities.

Since we live in a world, where there is a limitation for everything, countries, companies and families all have their own budgets, regardless of schools. Whether invests the limited resource on hiring famous teachers or improving facilities is a ubiquitous dilemma for every school. As far as I am concerned, hiring famous teachers may sound better.

First, famous teachers will not go to a school without basic facilities. It is obvious that famous teachers always have a lot of researches to do. To accomplish these works, they need decent facilities. Just like a good Formula One driver needs a lighting fast race car to sever as a good assistant, without that assistant, the driver is just a driver.

Second, famous teachers always enjoy the spotlight from the society. Merely their names may catch the eyeballs of the public, not to mention their potential outstanding research outcomes. When pounding on choosing schools, most of my friends value more on how many famous teachers in that school or department. They don’t pay too much attention on the facilities of the school. As a result, more students would like to apply the school with more famous teachers, and along comes with more funding to the teachers’ research programs as well as the school.

Third, famous teachers can improve the abilities of their colleagues for sure. Not only can they teach the students, their colleagues can also learn from them. Hiring one famous teacher may turn out to be a genius decision, if years later, some of his colleagues become more competent. After weeks of Linsanity, we all know what a magic a famous co-worker can bring into the whole team.

In conclusion, given that hiring famous teachers have more valuable merits for schools. I therefore reinforce my standpoint to hire famous teachers as my choice for the investment.

Frankie0616UID: 2763738

revised~