【特训小组】laotaitai任务帖！

liang0603UID：3182007

lz加油！

laotaitaiUID：3143871

怎么没法下载，怎么搞得？
刚刚水果的修改意见也是这样的。

16# liang0603

liang0603UID：3182007

lz加油

laotaitaiUID：3143871

邮件已收到，谢谢你的修改。

请教：etc为什么不能用缩写？

18# liang0603

laotaitaiUID：3143871

好多人都是那么写的，但是refute，contradict加上之后，我自己就拧不过来意思。
14# 秋雨荆州

laotaitaiUID：3143871

欢迎挑错啊

liang0603UID：3182007

lz写的很好！加油！

水果的夏天UID：3022981

lz请过目

laotaitaiUID：3143871

写完感觉又跑题了啊

laotaitaiUID：3143871

6.3 it is better to relex by....

时间很紧UID：3234536

写的很好，向楼主学习？就是有一些小语句的问题啦

laotaitaiUID：3143871

TPO13

laotaitaiUID：3143871

之前的一个题目，没写!
colleges or university should offer more courses to help students to prepare their future

好心人帮忙改改！

laotaitaiUID：3143871

Tpo19 综合

According to the reading passage, the author claims that buzzing has generated a lot of controversy, and should be banned. This point of view, however, is complete disapproved by the statement of a part-time buzzer in the listening passage, which render three evidences to argue that buzzing is not as bad as people think.

First of all, the buzzer begins by pointing out that buzzers usually tell the truth of products to the customers indeed, and the truth always comes from their personal experience which they feel the goods is really good, although they get some money from the employer. Therefore, they are not the advertiser. This inference contests the standpoint that buzzers do not tell the truth.

Furthermore, whereas the reading passage supports that people believe whatever buzzers tell about, the buzzer in the lecture sustains that the opposite is the truth. Because people will ask many questions to know the products, such as, the price, service and so on. If the buzzer could not answer some question, the consumers can not buy anything from them. Therefore, this point contradicts the assumption in the reading passage.

Finally, the buzzer in the lecture pinpoints that they do not distort the social relationship, if the consumers had tried the product already, they can tell the advantage and disadvantage all by themselves. So, it is no necessary for buzzer to hided the truth. Thence, the buzzer continues to cast doubt on the content of reading passage, which considers that buzzing causes the spreading of mistrust and the expectation of dishonesty.

laotaitaiUID：3143871

Tpo19 综合

According to the reading passage, the author claims that buzzing has generated a lot of controversy, and should be banned. This point of view, however, is complete disapproved by the statement of a part-time buzzer in the listening passage, which render three evidences to argue that buzzing is not as bad as people think.

First of all, the buzzer begins by pointing out that buzzers usually tell the truth of products to the customers indeed, and the truth always comes from their personal experience which they feel the goods is really good, although they get some money from the employer. Therefore, they are not the advertiser. This inference contests the standpoint that buzzers do not tell the truth.

Furthermore, whereas the reading passage supports that people believe whatever buzzers tell about, the buzzer in the lecture sustains that the opposite is the truth. Because people will ask many questions to know the products, such as, the price, service and so on. If the buzzer could not answer some question, the consumers can not buy anything from them. Therefore, this point contradicts the assumption in the reading passage.

Finally, the buzzer in the lecture pinpoints that they do not distort the social relationship, if the consumers had tried the product already, they can tell the advantage and disadvantage all by themselves. So, it is no necessary for buzzer to hided the truth. Thence, the buzzer continues to cast doubt on the content of reading passage, which considers that buzzing causes the spreading of mistrust and the expectation of dishonesty.