Argument 142提纲

bemaybeUID: 3208369

Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller-skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment. Within that group of people, 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots had not been wearing any protective clothing (helmets, knee pads, etc.) or any light-reflecting material (clip-on lights, glow-in-the-dark wrist pads, etc.). Clearly, the statistics indicate that by investing in high-quality protective gear and reflective equipment, roller skaters will greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured in an accident.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

想很久不知道这题这么展开，顶多是医院调查样本小和街道、停车场这两个特殊地点不能推广到其他场合。
求大家指点！

bemaybeUID: 3208369

有人也在关注这题吗？求高手指点一下啊！越是不会写，就感觉越容易考到啊，心慌中……

alteraUID: 2724954

这篇是官方范文给出来的。
攻击点基本就围绕那个study ，不能说明需要在protective和reflect 投钱，中间的逻辑关系。
① ：study未设计对照试验
②：study数据没考虑他因（范文里给的是个人心理问题）
③：即便是有需要，要分清楚，投钱到protective上还是reflect 上。

bemaybeUID: 3208369

非常感谢！再弱问一下，范文在哪里？OG上不是关于水上运动那篇吗？
难怪别人都不理我，原来有范文。